World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
40884
World Ranking
5007
National Ranking
2716

Barry A. Siegel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry A. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 460 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Barry A. Siegel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry A. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barry A. Siegel is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research contributes extensively to the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Oncology, and Genetics.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics, showing a concentration on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, as well as Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging.

Recent publications by Barry A. Siegel include:

  • Diagnostic Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from the CONDOR Phase III, Multicenter Study, 2021, Clinical Cancer Research
  • A Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT with 18 F-DCFPyL in Prostate Cancer Patients (OSPREY), 2021, The Journal of Urology
  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Amyloid PET Positivity in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Assessment of a Plasma Amyloid Probability Score to Estimate Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Findings Among Adults With Cognitive Impairment, 2022, JAMA Network Open

Barry A. Siegel frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Lucy Hanna
  • Gil D. Rabinovici
  • Bruce E. Hillner
  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Andrew March

The scientist has published multiple papers in a variety of venues. Notable frequent venues are:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Best Publications

  • Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma

    Malik E. Juweid;Sigrid Stroobants;Otto S. Hoekstra;Felix M. Mottaghy

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

  • Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development

    Gary J. Kelloff;John M. Hoffman;Bruce Johnson;Howard I. Scher

  • Procedure Guideline for Tumor Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0

    Dominique Delbeke;R. Edward Coleman;Milton J. Guiberteau;Manuel L. Brown

  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of 18F-FDG PET as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response in Patients in National Cancer Institute Trials

    Lalitha K. Shankar;John M. Hoffman;Steve Bacharach;Michael M. Graham

  • Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET).

    Felix G. Fernandez;Jeffrey A. Drebin;David C. Linehan;Farrokh Dehdashti

  • Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer.

    Jeffrey Bradley;Wade L. Thorstad;Sasa Mutic;Tom R. Miller

  • Lymph Node Staging by Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Carcinoma of the Cervix

    Perry W. Grigsby;Barry A. Siegel;Farrokh Dehdashti

  • Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors.

    M A Mintun;M J Welch;B A Siegel;C J Mathias

  • Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry

    Bruce E. Hillner;Barry A. Siegel;Dawei Liu;Anthony F. Shields

  • Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer.

    Joanne E. Mortimer;Farrokh Dehdashti;Barry A. Siegel;Kathryn Trinkaus

  • Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia.

    Gil D. Rabinovici;Constantine Gatsonis;Charles Apgar;Kiran Chaudhary

  • In vivo assessment of tumor hypoxia in lung cancer with 60Cu-ATSM

    Farrokh Dehdashti;Mark A. Mintun;Jason S. Lewis;Jeffrey Bradley

  • Assessing tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer by positron emission tomography with 60Cu-ATSM: relationship to therapeutic response-a preliminary report.

    Farrokh Dehdashti;Perry W Grigsby;Mark A Mintun;Jason S Lewis

  • FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features.

    Kevin L. Berger;Siobhan A. Nicholson;Farrokh Dehdashti;Barry A. Siegel

  • Ventilation-perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism.

    D. R. Biello;A. G. Mattar;R. C. McKnight;Barry Siegel

  • 64Cu-MM-302 positron emission tomography quantifies variability of enhanced permeability and retention of nanoparticles in relation to treatment response in patients with metastatic breast cancer

    Helen Lee;Anthony F. Shields;Barry A. Siegel;Kathy D. Miller

  • Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum

    Mark H. Whiteford;Heather M. Whiteford;Laurence F. Yee;Olagunju A. Ogunbiyi

  • Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

    F L Flanagan;F Dehdashti;B A Siegel;D D Trask

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18 F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

Frequent Co-Authors

Farrokh Dehdashti
Farrokh Dehdashti Washington University in St. Louis
Perry W. Grigsby
Perry W. Grigsby Washington University in St. Louis
Michael J. Welch
Michael J. Welch Washington University in St. Louis
David G. Mutch
David G. Mutch Washington University in St. Louis
R. Edward Coleman
R. Edward Coleman Duke University
Michael J. Morris
Michael J. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
John A. Katzenellenbogen
John A. Katzenellenbogen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gerald L. Andriole
Gerald L. Andriole Washington University in St. Louis
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options related to medicine in the USA often involves considering diverse online degree programs. For example, online nutrition degree programs are increasingly popular among those interested in diet, wellness, or public health. These flexible degrees offer a strong foundation for roles in healthcare without traditional medical training.

If you are drawn to the business side of healthcare, it’s critical to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Look for CAHME accreditation and robust coursework to ensure your qualification meets industry standards.

Nursing professionals considering advancement can explore rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited options. These programs allow registered nurses to earn their BSN completely online and without required clinicals, ideal for working professionals.

For those seeking rapid career progression in advanced practice nursing or leadership, accelerated dnp programs offer a streamlined, intensive path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Each of these options supports a flexible and accessible route toward meaningful healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Barry A. Siegel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles