World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
20832
World Ranking
2845
National Ranking
1322

Andrew R. Mayer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Mayer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 249 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andrew R. Mayer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Mayer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew R. Mayer is affiliated with the Mind Research Network in the United States. Their work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a notable focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mayer are:

  • Timothy B. Meier
  • Andrew B. Dodd
  • Harm J. van der Horn
  • Cidney R. Robertson-Benta
  • Josef M. Ling

Mayer has contributed extensively to several publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Neurology

Notable recent papers by Andrew R. Mayer include:

  • "Early targeted heart rate aerobic exercise versus placebo stretching for sport-related concussion in adolescents: a randomised controlled trial," published in 2021 in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • "Longitudinal white-matter abnormalities in sports-related concussion," published in 2020 in Neurology
  • "The neurocomputational bases of explore-exploit decision-making," published in 2022 in Neuron
  • "Large-scale analysis of structural brain asymmetries in schizophrenia via the ENIGMA consortium," published in 2023 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Role of biomarkers and emerging technologies in defining and assessing neurobiological recovery after sport-related concussion: a systematic review," published in 2023 in British Journal of Sports Medicine

Best Publications

  • A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks

    Elena A. Allen;Erik B. Erhardt;Eswar Damaraju;William Gruner;William Gruner

  • Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium

    Unknown

  • The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing.

    Stephen M. Rao;Andrew R. Mayer;Deborah L. Harrington;Deborah L. Harrington;Deborah L. Harrington

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries

    Paul M Thompson;Neda Jahanshad;Christopher R K Ching;Lauren E Salminen

  • Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces.

    Catherine L. Leveroni;Michael Seidenberg;Andrew R. Mayer;Andrew R. Mayer;Larissa A. Mead

  • Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury.

    Andrew R. Mayer;Andrew R. Mayer;Maggie V. Mannell;Josef Ling;Charles Gasparovic;Charles Gasparovic

  • A prospective diffusion tensor imaging study in mild traumatic brain injury

    A. R. Mayer;M. V. Mannell;C. Gasparovic

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics

    Xi Nian Zuo;Jeffrey S. Anderson;Pierre Bellec;Rasmus M. Birn

  • Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory

    Roberto Cabeza;Stephen M. Rao;Anthony D. Wagner;Andrew R. Mayer

  • ENIGMA and Global Neuroscience: A Decade of Large-Scale Studies of the Brain in Health and Disease Across More Than 40 Countries

    Paul Thompson

  • Facial affect recognition in criminal psychopaths.

    David S. Kosson;Yana Suchy;Andrew R. Mayer;John Libby

  • What is the physiological time to recovery after concussion? A systematic review.

    Joshua Kamins;Erin Bigler;Tracey Covassin;Luke Henry

  • Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space

    Catherine M. Arrington;Thomas H. Carr;Andrew R. Mayer;Stephen M. Rao

  • Motor Sequence Complexity and Performing Hand Produce Differential Patterns of Hemispheric Lateralization

    Kathleen Y. Haaland;Catherine L. Elsinger;Andrew R. Mayer;Sally Durgerian

  • TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects.

    Vincent P. Clark;Brian A. Coffman;Andy R. Mayer;Michael Patrick Weisend

  • Recovery of Cerebral Blood Flow Following Sports-Related Concussion

    Timothy B. Meier;Timothy B. Meier;Patrick S. F. Bellgowan;Patrick S. F. Bellgowan;Rashmi Singh;Rayus Kuplicki

  • Neurometabolite concentrations in gray and white matter in mild traumatic brain injury: an 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

    Charles Gasparovic;Ronald Yeo;Maggie Mannell;Josef Ling

  • Neural representation of interval encoding and decision making

    Deborah L. Harrington;Lara A. Boyd;Andrew R. Mayer;Daniel M. Sheltraw

  • Patterns of Gray Matter Abnormalities in Schizophrenia Based on an International Mega-analysis

    Cota Navin Gupta;Vince Daniel Calhoun;Vince Daniel Calhoun;Vince Daniel Calhoun;Srinivas Rachakonda;Jiayu Chen

  • Hippocampal structural and functional changes associated with electroconvulsive therapy response

    C C Abbott;T Jones;N T Lemke;P Gallegos

  • Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual–spatial orienting

    Andrew R. Mayer;Andrew R. Mayer;Jill M. Dorflinger;Jill M. Dorflinger;Stephen M. Rao;Michael Seidenberg

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional

    Randy L. Buckner;Vince D. Calhoun;F. Xavier Castellanos;Antao Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Ronald A. Yeo
Ronald A. Yeo University of New Mexico
Faith M. Hanlon
Faith M. Hanlon Mind Research Network
Juan R. Bustillo
Juan R. Bustillo University of New Mexico
Jessica A. Turner
Jessica A. Turner The Ohio State University
Stephen M. Rao
Stephen M. Rao Cleveland Clinic
Elisabeth A. Wilde
Elisabeth A. Wilde Baylor College of Medicine
José M. Cañive
José M. Cañive University of New Mexico
Vincent P. Clark
Vincent P. Clark University of New Mexico
Rex E. Jung
Rex E. Jung University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew R. Mayer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles