World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7921 7392 4247 3862 123 6763

Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2011. 4 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2011. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 5
2005 1
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 6
2010 5
2011 10
2012 9
2013 1
2014 5
2015 7
2016 8
2017 6
2018 4
2019 7
2020 8
2021 6
2022 3
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 125
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Media Influence and Health

Stine-Morrow has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Psychology and Aging
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Building and Environment
  • Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Stine-Morrow illustrate the scope of their studies and include:

  • "Beyond 'Use It or Lose It': The Impact of Engagement on Cognitive Aging," 2022, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  • "The Effects of Sustained Literacy Engagement on Cognition and Sentence Processing Among Older Adults," 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Tuning environmental lighting improves objective and subjective sleep quality in older adults," 2021, Building and Environment
  • "Introduction to the special issue on prosociality in adult development and aging: Advancing theory within a multilevel framework," 2021, Psychology and Aging
  • "Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample," 2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stine-Morrow include:

  • Ilber E. Manavbasi
  • Giavanna S. McCall
  • Xiaomei Liu
  • Shukhan Ng
  • Aron K. Barbey

In recognition of professional contributions, Stine-Morrow was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?:

    Daniel J. Simons;Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Susan E. Gathercole

  • Can an old dog learn (and want to experience) new tricks? Cognitive training increases openness to experience in older adults

    Joshua J. Jackson;Patrick L. Hill;Brennan R. Payne;Brent W. Roberts

  • Improving Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Nontraditional Approaches

    Denise C. Park;Angela H. Gutchess;Michelle L. Meade;Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow

  • The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive vitality: a field experiment.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Jeanine M. Parisi;Daniel G. Morrow;Denise C. Park

  • Aging and self-regulated language processing.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Lisa M. Soederberg Miller;Christopher Hertzog

  • Self-Regulated Reading in Adulthood

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Lisa M. Soederberg Miller;Danielle D. Gagne;Christopher Hertzog

  • Resource allocation in on-line reading by younger and older adults.

    Elizabeth A.L. Stine-Morrow;Mary K. Loveless;Lisa M. Soederberg

  • Aging and the Effects of Knowledge on On-Line Reading Strategies

    Lisa M. Soederberg Miller;Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow

  • Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: Evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities

    Brennan R. Payne;Sarah Grison;Xuefei Gao;Kiel Christianson

  • The influence of expertise and task factors on age differences in pilot communication.

    Daniel G. Morrow;William E. Menard;Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Thomas Teller

  • Training versus Engagement as Paths to Cognitive Enrichment with Aging

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Brennan R. Payne;Brent W. Roberts;Arthur F. Kramer

  • In the zone: flow state and cognition in older adults.

    Brennan R. Payne;Joshua J. Jackson;Soo Rim Noh;Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow

  • Age differences in on-line syntactic processing.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Sharon Ryan;J. Sandra Leonard

  • Adult age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Matthew C. Shake;Joseph R. Miles;Soo Rim Noh

  • Age differences in rereading.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Danielle D. Gagne;Daniel G. Morrow;Barbara Herman DeWall

  • The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve.

    Brennan R. Payne;Xuefei Gao;Soo Rim Noh;Carolyn J. Anderson

  • An Engagement Model of Cognitive Optimization Through Adulthood

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Jeanine M. Parisi;Daniel G. Morrow;Jennifer Greene

  • The process-knowledge model of health literacy: Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures

    Jessie Chin;Daniel G. Morrow;Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Thembi Conner-Garcia

  • Medication instruction design: younger and older adult schemas for taking medication

    Daniel G. Morrow;Von O. Leirer;Jill M. Andrassy;Jill M. Andrassy;Elizabeth Decker Tanke

  • Patterns of resource allocation are reliable among younger and older readers.

    Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Le-Ann Milinder;Olivia Pullara;Barbara Herman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel G. Morrow
Daniel G. Morrow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kara D. Federmeier
Kara D. Federmeier University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Patrick L. Hill
Patrick L. Hill Washington University in St. Louis
Joshua J. Jackson
Joshua J. Jackson Washington University in St. Louis
Joseph A. Mikels
Joseph A. Mikels DePaul University
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Carolyn J. Anderson
Carolyn J. Anderson University of Pittsburgh
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas
Robert W. Motl
Robert W. Motl University of Illinois at Chicago
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology offers a range of flexible, online options for students seeking to expand their expertise or launch new careers. Individuals looking to enhance foundational knowledge can begin with online graduate certificate programs in psychology. These programs are ideal for professionals wanting to develop specialized skills quickly.

For those interested in workplace dynamics, online masters degree in organizational psychology programs allow students to explore leadership, talent management, and organizational behavior from anywhere in the world. Many learners also consider advancing their studies through apa accredited industrial organizational psychology programs, which are widely respected by employers and open doors to consulting, HR, and management positions.

Students intrigued by the intersection of law and psychology may seek a forensic psychology masters usa program. This career pathway prepares graduates for roles within law enforcement, the legal system, and correctional settings. With online learning, gaining advanced credentials and broadening your career opportunities in psychology has never been more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles