World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6830 6364 3706 3367 250 12696

Walter R. Boot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Walter R. Boot between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Walter R. Boot published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2019. 44 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2019. 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Walter R. Boot: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 4
2005 3
2006 6
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 14
2011 12
2012 16
2013 13
2014 15
2015 20
2016 18
2017 12
2018 31
2019 46
2020 23
2021 23
2022 24
2023 22
2024 34
2025 10
Total 357
Download as CSV

Walter R. Boot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter R. Boot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 250 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 250
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Walter R. Boot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter R. Boot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Walter R. Boot is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States and has a primary research focus within the social sciences. Their scholarly output encompasses multiple subfields, including demography, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and general health professions.

The key topics Walter R. Boot explores in their research include technology use by older adults, dementia and cognitive impairment research, aging and gerontology research, cognitive functions and memory, impact of technology on adolescents, virtual reality applications and impacts, and cognitive abilities and testing.

Walter R. Boot has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, with a significant number of papers appearing in the journal Innovation in Aging. Other frequent publication venues include Gerontechnology, The Gerontologist, Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Walter R. Boot are:

  • A Grand Challenge for Psychology: Reducing the Age-Related Digital Divide, 2022, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • A Pilot Study Exploring Age Differences in Presence, Workload, and Cybersickness in the Experience of Immersive Virtual Reality Environments, 2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • Using a Nature-Based Virtual Reality Environment for Improving Mood States and Cognitive Engagement in Older Adults: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study, 2022, Innovation in Aging
  • New opportunities for the early detection and treatment of cognitive decline: adherence challenges and the promise of smart and person-centered technologies, 2023, BMC Digital Health
  • Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Enhance Social Interaction Among Older Adults: A Cross-Site Investigation, 2023, Innovation in Aging

Frequent co-authors in Walter R. Boot's research include:

  • Neil Charness
  • Sara J. Czaja
  • Wendy A. Rogers
  • Shenghao Zhang
  • Andrew Dilanchian

Walter R. Boot has also contributed to academic books, notably publishing the title Extended Reality Solutions to Support Older Adults in 2024 under the series Synthesis lectures on technology and health.

Best Publications

  • The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control.

    Walter R. Boot;Arthur F. Kramer;Daniel J. Simons;Monica Fabiani

  • Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?:

    Daniel J. Simons;Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Susan E. Gathercole

  • Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults?

    Chandramallika Basak;Walter R. Boot;Michelle W. Voss;Arthur F. Kramer

  • Aging and Information Technology Use Potential and Barriers

    Neil Charness;Walter R. Boot

  • The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects

    Walter R. Boot;Daniel J. Simons;Cary Stothart;Cassie Stutts

  • Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition

    Walter Richard Boot;Daniel P Blakely;Daniel J Simons

  • Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Sara J Czaja;Walter R Boot;Neil Charness;Wendy A Rogers

  • A New Tool for Assessing Mobile Device Proficiency in Older Adults: The Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire:

    Nelson A. Roque;Walter R. Boot

  • Technology Adoption by Older Adults: Findings From the PRISM Trial.

    Tracy L Mitzner;Jyoti Savla;Walter R Boot;Joseph Sharit

  • Visual Skills in Airport-Security Screening

    Jason S. McCarley;Arthur F. Kramer;Christopher D. Wickens;Eric D. Vidoni

  • Designing for Older Adults

    Unknown

  • Computer Proficiency Questionnaire: Assessing Low and High Computer Proficient Seniors

    Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Video Games as a Means to Reduce Age-Related Cognitive Decline: Attitudes, Compliance, and Effectiveness

    Walter R. Boot;Michael Champion;Daniel Patrick Blakely;Timothy Wright

  • Perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite volleyball players.

    Heloisa Alves;Michelle W. Voss;Walter R. Boot;Andrea Deslandes

  • Striatal Volume Predicts Level of Video Game Skill Acquisition

    Kirk I. Erickson;Walter R. Boot;Chandramallika Basak;Mark B. Neider

  • Effects of training strategies implemented in a complex videogame on functional connectivity of attentional networks

    Michelle W. Voss;Ruchika Shaurya Prakash;Kirk I. Erickson;Walter R. Boot

  • Technology, Gaming, and Social Networking

    Neil Charness;Walter R. Boot

  • Learning to multitask: Effects of video game practice on electrophysiological indices of attention and resource allocation

    Edward L. Maclin;Kyle E. Mathewson;Kathy A. Low;Walter R. Boot

  • Regional differences in brain volume predict the acquisition of skill in a complex real-time strategy videogame.

    Chandramallika Basak;Michelle W. Voss;Kirk I. Erickson;Walter R. Boot

  • Transfer of skill engendered by complex task training under conditions of variable priority.

    Walter R. Boot;Chandramallika Basak;Kirk I. Erickson;Mark Neider

  • Improving the Safety of Aging Road Users – A Mini-Review

    Walter R. Boot;Cary Stothart;Neil Charness

  • Designing for Older Adults: Case Studies, Methods, and Tools

    Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja;Wendy A. Rogers

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Charness
Neil Charness Florida State University
Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Sara J. Czaja
Sara J. Czaja Cornell University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Wendy A. Rogers
Wendy A. Rogers University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joseph Sharit
Joseph Sharit University of Miami
James R. Brockmole
James R. Brockmole University of Notre Dame
Michelle W. Voss
Michelle W. Voss University of Iowa
Gabriele Gratton
Gabriele Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Monica Fabiani
Monica Fabiani University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, each with unique educational pathways. If you're aiming to become a licensed medical professional, understanding the qualifications to be a psychiatrist is essential. This route requires medical school and specialized residency training after your undergraduate studies.

For those interested in sports and athletic performance, discover how do you become a sports psychologist. This typically involves a graduate degree in psychology or a related field, along with targeted internships and certification.

If your goal is to help others through counseling, you might wonder, is a psychology degree a requirement to become a therapist? Depending on your chosen specialty, related degrees in social work or counseling may also qualify you for this rewarding profession.

Finally, if you are interested in the intersection of psychology and business, it’s vital to know what degree is needed for industrial organizational psychology. Most roles require at least a master’s, and often a doctoral degree in this specialized area.

Online degree programs offer flexible options for working towards these varied paths, helping you meet educational requirements while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Walter R. Boot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles