World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
23314
World Ranking
2713
National Ranking
1268

Adam Gazzaley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Gazzaley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 214 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam Gazzaley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Gazzaley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Gazzaley is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience and psychology. The scientist's work highlights both broad and specialized areas, incorporating cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The core topics addressed by their research include neural and behavioral psychology studies, psychedelics and drug studies, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience and music perception, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Frequent collaboration is a notable aspect of their career. Regular co-authors include Joaquin A. Anguera, Courtney L. Gallen, Theodore P. Zanto, Alexander J. Simon, and Jessica Wise Younger. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research in their fields of interest.

Their recent publications reflect a diverse range of investigations within cognitive neuroscience and related topics. Some of the recent papers include:

  • "Linked Sources of Neural Noise Contribute to Age-related Cognitive Decline," 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Canalization and Plasticity in Psychopathology," 2022, Neuropharmacology
  • "Enhanced Attention Using Head-mounted Virtual Reality," 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "A Complex Systems Perspective on Psychedelic Brain Action," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Virtual Reality Video Game Improves High-fidelity Memory in Older Adults," 2021, Scientific Reports

Among the journals publishing their work, the most frequent venues are the Journal of Medical Internet Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Psychology, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults

    J. A. Anguera;J. Boccanfuso;J. L. Rintoul;O. Al-Hashimi

  • Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory

    Adam Gazzaley;Anna C. Nobre

  • Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging

    Adam Gazzaley;Jeffrey W Cooney;Jesse Rissman;Mark D'Esposito

  • Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging.

    Mark D'Esposito;Leon Y. Deouell;Adam Gazzaley

  • Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task

    Jesse Rissman;Adam Gazzaley;Adam Gazzaley;Mark D'Esposito;Mark D'Esposito

  • Age-Related Changes in 1/f Neural Electrophysiological Noise.

    Bradley Voytek;Mark A. Kramer;John Case;Kyle Q. Lepage

  • Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory

    Theodore P Zanto;Michael T Rubens;Arul Thangavel;Adam Gazzaley

  • Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity

    Adam Gazzaley;Jeffrey W. Cooney;Kevin McEvoy;Robert T. Knight

  • Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing

    Adam Gazzaley;Wesley Clapp;Jon Kelley;Kevin McEvoy

  • Differential Regulation of NMDAR1 mRNA and Protein by Estradiol in the Rat Hippocampus

    Adam H. Gazzaley;Nancy G. Weiland;Bruce S. McEwen;John H. Morrison

  • Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control

    Theodore P. Zanto;Adam Gazzaley

  • Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance

    Adam Gazzaley;Jesse Rissman;Mark D’esposito

  • The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial.

    Patricia A Arean;Kevin A Hallgren;Joshua T Jordan;Adam Gazzaley

  • Neural suppression of irrelevant information underlies optimal working memory performance.

    Theodore P. Zanto;Adam Gazzaley

  • Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Wan-Yu Hsu;Yixuan Ku;Theodore P. Zanto;Adam Gazzaley

  • The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World

    Adam Gazzaley;Larry D. Rosen

  • Functional Interactions between Prefrontal and Visual Association Cortex Contribute to Top-Down Modulation of Visual Processing

    Adam Gazzaley;Adam Gazzaley;Jesse Rissman;Jeffrey Cooney;Aaron Rutman

  • The Influence of Perceptual Training on Working Memory in Older Adults

    Anne S. Berry;Theodore P. Zanto;Wesley C. Clapp;Joseph L. Hardy

  • Deficit in switching between functional brain networks underlies the impact of multitasking on working memory in older adults

    Wesley C. Clapp;Michael T. Rubens;Jasdeep Sabharwal;Adam Gazzaley

  • Top-Down Modulation and Normal Aging

    Adam Gazzaley;Adam Gazzaley;Mark D'esposito

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Bradley Voytek
Bradley Voytek University of California, San Diego
John H. Morrison
John H. Morrison University of California, Davis
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Julene K. Johnson
Julene K. Johnson University of California, San Francisco
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco
Linda L. Chao
Linda L. Chao University of California, San Francisco
Daphne Bavelier
Daphne Bavelier University of Geneva
Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to numerous interdisciplinary careers. Many students interested in brain science also consider related online degrees in psychology, social work, or therapy to broaden their impact and flexibility.

If you're seeking entry into mental health fields, an accredited online psychology degree provides essential knowledge in behavioral science and cognitive processes. This path is valuable for those aiming to become counselors or specialists in neuropsychology.

Graduates with a desire to make a difference in community and healthcare settings may pursue masters in social work online programs. These programs pave the way for clinical social work, advocacy, and policy roles, especially when combined with neuroscience expertise.

For those wanting specialized clinical careers, research, or advanced therapeutic practice, consider psy d programs or marriage and family therapy online programs. These flexible online pathways support work in clinical psychology, counseling, and family support, broadening your potential career impact after neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Gazzaley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles