World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
12303
World Ranking
7513
National Ranking
3236

Bradley Voytek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Voytek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 97 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bradley Voytek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Voytek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Bradley Voytek is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States and has a focus on neuroscience, with a significant concentration in cognitive neuroscience. Their research portfolio includes 135 publications primarily in the field of neuroscience, with notable contributions to cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their main research topics cover neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, memory and neural mechanisms, receptor mechanisms and signaling, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Voytek has coauthored work frequently with Thomas Donoghue, Natalie Schaworonkow, Richard Gao, Sydney Smith, and Erik Peterson, with the highest number of collaborations being with Donoghue and Schaworonkow.

Key publication venues for their research include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Translational Psychiatry, Journal of Neuroscience, and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, among others.

  • Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components (2020, Nature Neuroscience)
  • Neuronal timescales are functionally dynamic and shaped by cortical microarchitecture (2020, eLife)
  • Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations (2021, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Modality-specific tracking of attention and sensory statistics in the human electrophysiological spectral exponent (2021, eLife)
  • Longitudinal changes in aperiodic and periodic activity in electrophysiological recordings in the first seven months of life (2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)

Their research spans various aspects of neural function, focusing on electrophysiological measures, neural oscillations, and cortical microarchitecture. The studies address both methodological perspectives and empirical data, contributing to understanding brain activity from early development through functional brain dynamics.

Among the recognitions received, Voytek was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components.

    Thomas Donoghue;Matar Haller;Erik J. Peterson;Paroma Varma

  • Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials.

    Richard Gao;Erik J. Peterson;Bradley Voytek

  • Complex Oscillatory Waves Emerging from Cortical Organoids Model Early Human Brain Network Development.

    Cleber A. Trujillo;Richard Gao;Priscilla D. Negraes;Jing Gu

  • Age-Related Changes in 1/f Neural Electrophysiological Noise.

    Bradley Voytek;Mark A. Kramer;John Case;Kyle Q. Lepage

  • Dynamic network communication as a unifying neural basis for cognition, development, aging, and disease.

    Bradley Voytek;Robert T. Knight

  • Brain Oscillations and the Importance of Waveform Shape

    Scott R. Cole;Bradley Voytek

  • Shifts in Gamma Phase–Amplitude Coupling Frequency from Theta to Alpha Over Posterior Cortex During Visual Tasks

    Bradley Voytek;Ryan T. Canolty;Ryan T. Canolty;Avgusta Shestyuk;Nathan E. Crone

  • Neuronal timescales are functionally dynamic and shaped by cortical microarchitecture

    Richard Gao;Ruud L van den Brink;Thomas Pfeffer;Bradley Voytek

  • Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations.

    Thomas Donoghue;Natalie Schaworonkow;Bradley Voytek

  • Oscillatory dynamics coordinating human frontal networks in support of goal maintenance.

    Bradley Voytek;Andrew S Kayser;Andrew S Kayser;David Badre;David Fegen

  • Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices

    Unknown

  • Modality-specific tracking of attention and sensory statistics in the human electrophysiological spectral exponent

    Leonhard Waschke;Thomas Donoghue;Lorenz Fiedler;Sydney Smith

  • Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations

    Scott Cole;Bradley Voytek

  • Nonsinusoidal beta oscillations reflect cortical pathophysiology in Parkinson's disease

    Scott R. Cole;Roemer van der Meij;Erik J. Peterson;Coralie de Hemptinne

  • Parameterizing neural power spectra

    Matar Haller;Thomas Donoghue;Erik Peterson;Paroma Varma

  • Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory.

    Bradley Voytek;Robert T. Knight

  • EEG power spectral slope differs by ADHD status and stimulant medication exposure in early childhood

    Madeline M. Robertson;Sarah Furlong;Bradley Voytek;Thomas Donoghue

  • Longitudinal changes in aperiodic and periodic activity in electrophysiological recordings in the first seven months of life.

    Natalie Schaworonkow;Bradley Voytek

  • Cerebral metabolic dysfunction and impaired vigilance in recently abstinent methamphetamine abusers.

    Edythe D. London;Steven M. Berman;Bradley Voytek;Sara L. Simon

  • Supraphysiological doses of levothyroxine alter regional cerebral metabolism and improve mood in bipolar depression.

    M Bauer;M Bauer;E D London;N Rasgon;N Rasgon;S M Berman

  • Dynamic Neuroplasticity after Human Prefrontal Cortex Damage

    Bradley Voytek;Matar Davis;Elena Yago;Francisco Barceló

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Timothy Verstynen
Timothy Verstynen Carnegie Mellon University
Magnus Lindgren
Magnus Lindgren Lund University
Tor Endestad
Tor Endestad University of Oslo
Adam Gazzaley
Adam Gazzaley University of California, San Francisco
Paulina Due-Tønnessen
Paulina Due-Tønnessen Oslo University Hospital
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Nathan E. Crone
Nathan E. Crone Johns Hopkins University
Gene W. Yeo
Gene W. Yeo University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse career pathways, especially when combined with complementary online degrees. Many students interested in the human mind also explore cacrep-accredited programs, which are essential for those pursuing licensed counseling careers. These accredited programs ensure you meet rigorous industry standards and prepare for state licensure.

For students seeking flexibility, online counseling programs offer affordable, accessible education without putting your career on hold. If your interests extend to family dynamics and therapy, there are specialized marriage and family masters programs available online that can enhance your neuroscience background with clinical skills.

Additionally, pursuing a masters in psychology can open pathways in research, mental health, and therapeutic practice. Combining neuroscience study in the USA with these related online degrees can make you a well-rounded, competitive candidate in many rewarding professions.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley Voytek

Trending Scientists