World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tor Endestad

Tor Endestad

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4174
World Ranking
9964
National Ranking
94

Tor Endestad publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tor Endestad sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tor Endestad D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tor Endestad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tor Endestad is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research primarily falls within the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, as well as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, music, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their scientific contributions span various topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Neuroscience and music perception
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Diverse music education insights
  • Hearing loss and rehabilitation

Frequent collaborators in their work include Anne-Kristin Solbakk, Alejandro O. Blenkmann, Robert T. Knight, Pål G. Larsson, and Jugoslav Ivanović.

Tor Endestad has published extensively in a number of venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, and Cerebral Cortex.

Notable recent papers illustrating their research include:

  • The association of PTSD symptom severity with amygdala nuclei volumes in traumatized youths, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • The ascending arousal system promotes optimal performance through mesoscale network integration in a visuospatial attentional task, 2021, Network Neuroscience
  • Subspace partitioning in the human prefrontal cortex resolves cognitive interference, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Top-Down Attentional Modulation in Human Frontal Cortex: Differential Engagement during External and Internal Attention, 2020, Cerebral Cortex

Best Publications

  • Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus.

    Dag Alnæs;Markus Handal Sneve;Thomas Espeseth;Thomas Espeseth;Tor Endestad

  • Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil

    Bruno Laeng;Tor Endestad

  • Children's usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors

    Jan Heim;Petter Bae Brandtzæg;Birgit Hertzberg Kaare;Tor Endestad

  • Generalized Role for the Cerebellum in Encoding Internal Models: Evidence from Semantic Processing

    Torgeir Moberget;Eva Hilland Gullesen;Stein Andersson;Stein Andersson;Richard B. Ivry

  • What people believe about memory

    Svein Magnussen;Jan Andersson;Cesare Cornoldi;Rossana De Beni

  • Placebo improves pleasure and pain through opposite modulation of sensory processing

    Dan-Mikael Ellingsen;Johan Wessberg;Marie Eikemo;Jaquette Liljencrantz

  • The role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in inhibitory motor control.

    Ulrike M. Krämer;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Ingrid Funderud;Marianne Løvstad

  • Executive functions after orbital or lateral prefrontal lesions: neuropsychological profiles and self-reported executive functions in everyday living.

    M. Løvstad;I. Funderud;T. Endestad;P. Due-Tønnessen

  • Bidirectional Frontoparietal Oscillatory Systems Support Working Memory

    Elizabeth L. Johnson;Elizabeth L. Johnson;Callum Dewar;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Tor Endestad

  • In the borderland between family orientation and peer culture: the use of communication technologies among Norwegian tweens

    Birgit Hertzberg Kaare;Petter Bae Brandtzæg;Jan Heim;Tor Endestad

  • Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention

    Julia W Y Kam;Jack J Lin;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Tor Endestad

  • Dynamic frontotemporal systems process space and time in working memory.

    Elizabeth L. Johnson;Jenna N. Adams;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Tor Endestad

  • Relations between episodic memory, suggestibility, theory of mind, and cognitive inhibition in the preschool child

    Annika Melinder;Tor Endestad;Svein Magnussen

  • Rehabilitation of Executive Functions in Patients with Chronic Acquired Brain Injury with Goal Management Training, External Cuing, and Emotional Regulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Sveinung Tornås;Marianne Løvstad;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Jonathan Evans

  • Contribution of subregions of human frontal cortex to novelty processing

    Marianne Løvstad;Ingrid Funderud;Magnus Lindgren;Tor Endestad

  • Increased default-mode variability is related to reduced task-performance and is evident in adults with ADHD.

    Athanasia Monika Mowinckel;Dag Alnæs;Mads Lund Pedersen;Mads Lund Pedersen;Sigurd Ziegler

  • The association of PTSD symptom severity with amygdala nuclei volumes in traumatized youths.

    Olga Therese Ousdal;Anne Marita Milde;Gertrud Sofie Hafstad;Erlend Hodneland

  • Auditory deviance detection in the human insula: An intracranial EEG study.

    Alejandro Omar Blenkmann;Santiago Collavini;James Lubell;Anaïs Llorens;Anaïs Llorens

  • Attentional load modulates large-scale functional brain connectivity beyond the core attention networks.

    Dag Alnæs;Tobias Kaufmann;Geneviève Richard;Eugene P. Duff

  • Attentional control and subjective executive function in treatment-naive adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

    Venke Arntsberg Grane;Tor Endestad;Arnfrid Farbu Pinto;Anne-Kristin Solbakk

  • Anterior cingulate cortex and cognitive control: neuropsychological and electrophysiological findings in two patients with lesions to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex.

    M. Løvstad;I. Funderud;T. Meling;U.M. Krämer

  • Differential Go/NoGo Activity in both Contingent Negative Variation and Spectral Power

    Ingrid Funderud;Magnus Lindgren;Magnus Lindgren;Marianne Løvstad;Tor Endestad;Tor Endestad

  • Effects of prefrontal cortex damage on emotion understanding: EEG and behavioural evidence

    Anat Perry;Samantha N. Saunders;Jennifer Stiso;Callum Dewar

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Magnus Lindgren
Magnus Lindgren Lund University
Svein Magnussen
Svein Magnussen University of Oslo
Lars T. Westlye
Lars T. Westlye University of Oslo
Dag Alnæs
Dag Alnæs Oslo University Hospital
Annika Melinder
Annika Melinder University of Oslo
Paulina Due-Tønnessen
Paulina Due-Tønnessen Oslo University Hospital
Stein Andersson
Stein Andersson University of Oslo
Bradley Voytek
Bradley Voytek University of California, San Diego
Mark W. Greenlee
Mark W. Greenlee University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to many rewarding online programs and diverse career pathways, from mental health counseling to research and education. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer flexible online degrees in psychology, allowing students to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

If you’re interested in becoming a counselor, it’s important to know that educational and licensing requirements can differ from state to state. For example, you can learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Maryland, the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Massachusetts, and the fastest way to become a counselor in Michigan through state-specific guidance.

Additionally, several states now offer accelerated and online programs for those looking to fast-track their careers. Minnesota, for instance, features Minnesota accelerated counseling programs designed for quicker entry into the field.

By choosing the right online program and understanding your state's requirements, you can build a meaningful and flexible career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Tor Endestad

Trending Scientists