World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 3023 2782 136 133 305 12696
Neuroscience 64 3297 3015 289 269 355 13264

Mark W. Greenlee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Greenlee between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Greenlee published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2011. 14 of the 373 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2011. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
1984 2025

373 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Greenlee: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 5
1986 3
1987 2
1988 7
1989 1
1990 6
1991 6
1992 7
1993 4
1994 3
1995 3
1996 5
1997 7
1998 13
1999 4
2000 14
2001 5
2002 8
2003 6
2004 4
2005 5
2006 6
2007 9
2008 13
2009 11
2010 20
2011 24
2012 14
2013 19
2014 18
2015 12
2016 14
2017 13
2018 15
2019 7
2020 9
2021 17
2022 9
2023 8
2024 5
2025 9
Total 373
Download as CSV

Mark W. Greenlee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Greenlee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 305 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 305
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Greenlee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Greenlee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark W. Greenlee is affiliated with the University of Regensburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to neuroscience research. Their work focuses primarily on cognitive neuroscience, with significant outputs in areas such as visual perception, functional brain connectivity, and neural dynamics.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience

Subfields of their research activity cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Mark W. Greenlee has addressed several core topics in their publications:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The scientist has published in the following journals, demonstrating recurring contributions in these venues:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Scientific Reports
  • Current Biology
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark W. Greenlee include:

  • Sebastian Frank
  • Wilhelm M. Malloni
  • Tina Plank
  • Yih-Shiuan Lin
  • Takeo Watanabe

Selected recent publications exemplify the diversity and scope of their research:

  • Fundamental Differences in Visual Perceptual Learning between Children and Adults, 2020, Current Biology
  • Brain Connectivity Studies on Structure-Function Relationships: A Short Survey with an Emphasis on Machine Learning, 2021, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
  • Efficient learning in children with rapid GABA boosting during and after training, 2022, Current Biology
  • Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Forecasting brain activity based on models of spatiotemporal brain dynamics: A comparison of graph neural network architectures, 2022, Network Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Working memory in primate sensory systems

    Tatiana Pasternak;Mark W. Greenlee

  • The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

    Andrew T. Smith;Mark W. Greenlee;Krish Devi Singh;Falk M. Kraemer

  • Estimating Receptive Field Size from fMRI Data in Human Striate and Extrastriate Visual Cortex

    Andrew T. Smith;Krish Devi Singh;A. L. Williams;M. W. Greenlee

  • Being Barbie: the size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world.

    Björn van der Hoort;Arvid Guterstam;H. Henrik Ehrsson

  • Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study

    Markus Knauff;Thomas Mulack;Jan Kassubek;Helmut R Salih

  • Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex.

    A. T. Smith;Krish Devi Singh;M. W. Greenlee

  • Spatiotemporal frequency and direction sensitivities of human visual areas measured using fMRI

    Krish Devi Singh;A. T. Smith;M. W. Greenlee

  • The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

    Svein Magnussen;Mark W. Greenlee

  • The Relationship between Brain Oscillations and BOLD Signal during Memory Formation: A Combined EEG–fMRI Study

    Simon Hanslmayr;Gregor Volberg;Maria Wimber;Markus Raabe

  • Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory.

    Svein Magnussen;Mark W. Greenlee;Rolf Asplund;Stein Dyrnes

  • Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by fMRI.

    Markus Knauff;CA Jan Kassubek;Thomas Mulack;Mark W. Greenlee

  • Experimental pain thresholds and plasma beta-endorphin levels during exercise.

    Conrad Droste;Mark W. Greenlee;Martin Schreck;Helmut Roskamm

  • The functional role of contrast adaptation

    Mark W. Greenlee;Friedrich Heitger

  • Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex.

    Anton L. Beer;Tina Plank;Mark W. Greenlee

  • Relationship between saccadic eye movements and cortical activity as measured by fMRI: quantitative and qualitative aspects.

    H. Kimmig;M. W. Greenlee;M. Gondan;M. Schira

  • THE TIME COURSE OF ADAPTATION TO SPATIAL CONTRAST

    Mark W. Greenlee;Mark A. Georgeson;Svein Magnussen;John P. Harris

  • Prestimulus Oscillatory Phase at 7 Hz Gates Cortical Information Flow and Visual Perception

    Simon Hanslmayr;Simon Hanslmayr;Gregor Volberg;Maria Wimber;Maria Wimber;Sarang S. Dalal

  • Human cortical areas underlying the perception of optic flow: brain imaging studies

    Mark W. Greenlee

  • The parieto-insular vestibular cortex in humans: more than a single area?

    Sebastian M. Frank;Mark W. Greenlee

  • Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short-term memory.

    Svein Magnussen;Mark W. Greenlee

  • Retrieval from episodic memory: Neural mechanisms of interference resolution

    Maria Wimber;Roland Marcus Rutschmann;Mark W. Greenlee;Karl-Heinz Bäuml

Frequent Co-Authors

Svein Magnussen
Svein Magnussen University of Oslo
Peter U. Tse
Peter U. Tse Dartmouth College
Gyula Kovács
Gyula Kovács Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Frans W. Cornelissen
Frans W. Cornelissen University Medical Center Groningen
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Simon Hanslmayr
Simon Hanslmayr University of Glasgow
Ulrich Bogdahn
Ulrich Bogdahn University of Regensburg
Jan Kassubek
Jan Kassubek University of Ulm
Martin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann University of Regensburg
Elmar Lang
Elmar Lang University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a wide range of online programs and exciting career opportunities. Many students choose to focus on becoming mental health counselors, a career with growing demand across the United States. Online psychology degrees equip you with foundational knowledge and practical skills needed for various roles in counseling, therapy, and related fields.

If you’re wondering how to become a mental health counselor in Stockton, requirements typically include completing a master’s degree, gaining supervised clinical experience, and earning state licensure. Likewise, mental health counselor requirements in Tampa emphasize the importance of accredited counseling programs and passing national exams.

Some locations may have additional steps—see how to become a mental health counselor in Toledo for local insights. For those interested in the Southwest, it's helpful to review the Tucson mental health counselor certification requirements before enrolling.

Matching your educational pursuits with the requirements of your preferred state can help you choose the best online psychology degree and streamline your career pathway into counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Greenlee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles