World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6885
World Ranking
8286
National Ranking
221

Frans W. Cornelissen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans W. Cornelissen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 252 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frans W. Cornelissen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans W. Cornelissen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frans W. Cornelissen is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their work involve visual perception and processing mechanisms, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal imaging and analysis, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, functional brain connectivity studies, retinal development and disorders, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Several recent publications illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Towards a unified understanding of lateralized vision: A large-scale study investigating principles governing patterns of lateralization using a heterogeneous sample, 2020, Cortex
  • Predictive masking of an artificial scotoma is associated with a system-wide reconfiguration of neural populations in the human visual cortex, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Local neuroplasticity in adult glaucomatous visual cortex, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • White matter alterations in glaucoma and monocular blindness differ outside the visual system, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Patients Prefer a Virtual Reality Approach Over a Similarly Performing Screen-Based Approach for Continuous Oculomotor-Based Screening of Glaucomatous and Neuro-Ophthalmological Visual Field Defects, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Frans W. Cornelissen include:

  • Remco J. Renken
  • Joana Carvalho
  • Azzurra Invernizzi
  • Nomdo M. Jansonius
  • Joost Heutink

Their research has appeared repeatedly in several scientific venues, reflecting established areas of interest and contribution. These frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox

    Frans W. Cornelissen;Enno M. Peters;John Palmer

  • Robust autofocusing in microscopy

    Jan-Mark Geusebroek;Jan-Mark Geusebroek;Frans Cornelissen;Arnold W.M. Smeulders;Hugo Geerts

  • Changes in cortical grey matter density associated with long-standing retinal visual field defects.

    Christine C. Boucard;Christine C. Boucard;Aditya T. Hernowo;Aditya T. Hernowo;Aditya T. Hernowo;R. Paul Maguire;R. Paul Maguire;Nomdo M. Jansonius

  • Impaired visual processing preceding image recognition in Parkinson's disease patients with visual hallucinations

    Anne Marthe Meppelink;Anne Marthe Meppelink;Bauke M. de Jong;Bauke M. de Jong;Remco Renken;Klaus L. Leenders;Klaus L. Leenders

  • Large-scale remapping of visual cortex is absent in adult humans with macular degeneration

    Heidi Ann Baseler;Andre Gouws;Koen V Haak;Christopher Racey

  • The effect of visual field defects on driving performance - A driving simulator study

    Tanja R. M. Coeckelbergh;Wiebo Hendrik Brouwer;Frans W. Cornelissen;Peter Van Wolffelaar

  • Simultaneous colour constancy revisited: an analysis of viewing strategies

    Frans W. Cornelissen;Eli Brenner

  • The influence of artificial scotomas on eye movements during visual search.

    Frans W Cornelissen;Klaas J Bruin;Aart C Kooijman

  • No functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for brightness and color filling-in in early human visual cortex.

    Frans W. Cornelissen;Alex R. Wade;Tony Vladusich;Robert F. Dougherty

  • The effect of visual field defects on eye movements and practical fitness to drive.

    Tanja R. M. Coeckelbergh;Frans W. Cornelissen;Wiebo Hendrik Brouwer;Aart C. Kooijman

  • Connective field modeling.

    Koen V. Haak;Jonathan Winawer;Ben M. Harvey;Remco Renken

  • SPATIAL INTERACTIONS IN COLOR-VISION DEPEND ON DISTANCES BETWEEN BOUNDARIES

    E Brenner;Frans Cornelissen

  • Automated morphometry of the visual pathway in primary open-angle glaucoma.

    Aditya T. Hernowo;Christine C. Boucard;Nomdo M. Jansonius;Johanna M. M. Hooymans

  • A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding.

    Ronald G. van den Berg;Jos B. T. M. Roerdink;Frans W. Cornelissen

  • Event-related fMRI responses in the human frontal eye fields in a randomized pro- and antisaccade task

    Frans W. Cornelissen;Hubert Kimmig;Mark Schira;Roland M. Rutschmann

  • Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning

    M. L. M. Tant;Frans W. Cornelissen;Aart C. Kooijman;Wiebo Hendrik Brouwer

  • Selection-for-action in visual search

    Aave Hannus;Frans W. Cornelissen;Oliver Lindemann;Oliver Lindemann;Harold Bekkering;Harold Bekkering

  • Population Receptive Field Dynamics in Human Visual Cortex

    Koen V. Haak;Frans W. Cornelissen;Antony B. Morland

  • On the generality of crowding: Visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation

    Ronald van den Berg;Jos B.T.M. Roerdink;Frans W. Cornelissen

  • Morphometric analyses of the visual pathways in macular degeneration.

    Aditya T. Hernowo;Doety Prins;Heidi A. Baseler;Heidi A. Baseler;Tina Plank

  • Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia

    M.L. Tant;Wiebo Brouwer;Frans Cornelissen;Aart Kooijman

  • An Image Statistics–Based Model for Fixation Prediction

    Victoria Yanulevskaya;Jan-Bernard C. Marsman;Frans W. Cornelissen;Jan-Mark Geusebroek

Frequent Co-Authors

Remco J. Renken
Remco J. Renken University Medical Center Groningen
Eli Brenner
Eli Brenner Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Wiebo Brouwer
Wiebo Brouwer University of Groningen
Jos B. T. M. Roerdink
Jos B. T. M. Roerdink University of Groningen
Antony B. Morland
Antony B. Morland University of York
Oliver Tucha
Oliver Tucha University of Rostock
Mark W. Greenlee
Mark W. Greenlee University of Regensburg
Jan-Mark Geusebroek
Jan-Mark Geusebroek University of Amsterdam
Harold Bekkering
Harold Bekkering Radboud University
Brian A. Wandell
Brian A. Wandell Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frans W. Cornelissen

Trending Scientists