World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 45 6841 6292 190 177 176 10333

Serge O. Dumoulin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Serge O. Dumoulin between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Serge O. Dumoulin published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 25 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
1998 2025

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Serge O. Dumoulin: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 0
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 6
2008 5
2009 3
2010 14
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 9
2015 8
2016 17
2017 11
2018 12
2019 9
2020 10
2021 19
2022 9
2023 9
2024 13
2025 12
Total 200
Download as CSV

Serge O. Dumoulin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Serge O. Dumoulin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 176
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Serge O. Dumoulin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Serge O. Dumoulin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 45
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Serge O. Dumoulin is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, as demonstrated by a substantial number of publications in this subfield. Other areas of study include radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, statistics and probability, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers a range of topics that include visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, advanced MRI techniques and applications, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, and mathematics education and teaching techniques.

Serge O. Dumoulin has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent of these include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Current Biology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Dumoulin include:

  • "A Network of Topographic Maps in Human Association Cortex Hierarchically Transforms Visual Timing-Selective Responses," 2020, Current Biology
  • "Topographic numerosity maps cover subitizing and estimation ranges," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Individualized cognitive neuroscience needs 7T: Comparing numerosity maps at 3T and 7T MRI," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Adaptation to visual numerosity changes neural numerosity selectivity," 2021, NeuroImage

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several colleagues, including:

  • Tomas Knapen
  • Shir Hofstetter
  • Wietske van der Zwaag
  • Ben M. Harvey
  • Alessio Fracasso

Best Publications

  • Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex

    Brian A. Wandell;Serge O. Dumoulin;Alyssa A. Brewer

  • Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex

    Serge O. Dumoulin;Brian A. Wandell

  • Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex

    B. M. Harvey;B. P. Klein;N. Petridou;S. O. Dumoulin

  • A New Anatomical Landmark for Reliable Identification of Human Area V5/MT: a Quantitative Analysis of Sulcal Patterning

    Serge O. Dumoulin;Richard G. Bittar;Noor J. Kabani;Curtis L. Baker

  • Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex.

    Kaoru Amano;Brian A. Wandell;Serge O. Dumoulin;Serge O. Dumoulin

  • The Relationship between Cortical Magnification Factor and Population Receptive Field Size in Human Visual Cortex: Constancies in Cortical Architecture

    Unknown

  • The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia.

    G. R. Barnes;R. F. Hess;S. O. Dumoulin;R. L. Achtman

  • Ultra-high field MRI: Advancing systems neuroscience towards mesoscopic human brain function

    Serge O. Dumoulin;Alessio Fracasso;Wietske van der Zwaag;Jeroen C.W. Siero

  • Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex

    Ben M. Harvey;Ben M. Harvey;Alessio Fracasso;Natalia Petridou;Serge O. Dumoulin

  • Attraction of Position Preference by Spatial Attention throughout Human Visual Cortex

    Unknown

  • Modeling center-surround configurations in population receptive fields using fMRI.

    Unknown

  • Cortical Maps and White Matter Tracts following Long Period of Visual Deprivation and Retinal Image Restoration

    Netta Levin;Serge O. Dumoulin;Jonathan Winawer;Robert F. Dougherty

  • A network of topographic numerosity maps in human association cortex

    Unknown

  • Decreased gray matter concentration in the lateral geniculate nuclei in human amblyopes.

    Gareth R. Barnes;Xingfeng Li;Benjamin Thompson;Krishna D. Singh

  • Laminar imaging of positive and negative BOLD in human visual cortex at 7T

    Alessio Fracasso;Peter R Luijten;Serge O Dumoulin;Natalia Petridou

  • Selectivity of human retinotopic visual cortex to S-cone-opponent, L⁄M-cone-opponent and achromatic stimulation

    Kathy T. Mullen;Serge O. Dumoulin;Katie L. McMahon;Greig I. de Zubicaray

  • Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit.

    Xingfeng Li;Serge O Dumoulin;Behzad Mansouri;Robert F Hess

  • Connective field modeling.

    Koen V. Haak;Jonathan Winawer;Ben M. Harvey;Remco Renken

  • Cortical Specialization for Processing First- and Second-order Motion

    Serge O. Dumoulin;Curtis L. Baker;Robert F. Hess;Alan C. Evans

  • Frequency specific spatial interactions in human electrocorticography: V1 alpha oscillations reflect surround suppression

    B.M. Harvey;M.J. Vansteensel;C.H. Ferrier;N. Petridou

  • Radial asymmetries in population receptive field size and cortical magnification factor in early visual cortex.

    Maria Fatima Silva;Jan W. Brascamp;Sónia Ferreira;Miguel Castelo-Branco

  • Plasticity and stability of the visual system in human achiasma.

    Michael B. Hoffmann;Falko R. Kaule;Netta Levin;Yoichiro Masuda

  • Automatic volumetric segmentation of human visual retinotopic cortex.

    Serge O. Dumoulin;Serge O. Dumoulin;Richard D. Hoge;Curtis L. Baker;Robert F. Hess

  • MP2RAGEME: T1 , T2* , and QSM mapping in one sequence at 7 tesla.

    Matthan W A Caan;Pierre-Louis Bazin;Pierre-Louis Bazin;José P Marques;Gilles de Hollander

  • Is the Cortical Deficit in Amblyopia Due to Reduced Cortical Magnification, Loss of Neural Resolution, or Neural Disorganization?

    Simon Clavagnier;Serge O Dumoulin;Robert F Hess

  • Systematic variation of population receptive field properties across cortical depth in human visual cortex

    Alessio Fracasso;Natalia Petridou;Serge O. Dumoulin

  • Full-brain coverage and high-resolution imaging capabilities of passband b-SSFP fMRI at 3T

    Jin Hyung Lee;Serge O. Dumoulin;Emine U. Saritas;Gary H. Glover

Frequent Co-Authors

Natalia Petridou
Natalia Petridou Utrecht University
Brian A. Wandell
Brian A. Wandell Stanford University
Frans W. Cornelissen
Frans W. Cornelissen University Medical Center Groningen
Remco J. Renken
Remco J. Renken University Medical Center Groningen
Robert F. Hess
Robert F. Hess McGill University
Mariska J. Vansteensel
Mariska J. Vansteensel Utrecht University
Jonathan Winawer
Jonathan Winawer New York University
Nick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey Utrecht University
Tanja C.W. Nijboer
Tanja C.W. Nijboer Utrecht University
Antony B. Morland
Antony B. Morland University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Many students consider related fields such as psychology, social work, and behavior analysis to expand their expertise and job opportunities. For those balancing work, life, and education, online programs offer vital flexibility and accessibility.

If you’re interested in the intersection of neuroscience and mental health, pursuing affordable msw programs online is a popular option. Social work is closely linked with neuroscience, especially in roles that help individuals manage mental health challenges. For a faster route, accelerated social work degree programs can help you enter the workforce more quickly.

Careers in applied behavior analysis are also in demand. For those interested in helping clients with behavioral conditions, bcba certification programs provide a clear path to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Finally, a strong understanding of psychology complements neuroscience expertise. Consider enrolling in a fastest online psychology degree to build your foundation for a broad array of research or clinical career options.

Best Scientists Citing Serge O. Dumoulin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles