World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
9862
World Ranking
7546
National Ranking
3253

Kendrick Kay publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendrick Kay sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kendrick Kay D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendrick Kay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kendrick Kay is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with extensive work in cognitive neuroscience as a key subfield. Additional areas of study include computer vision and pattern recognition, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, artificial intelligence, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research topics cover a broad spectrum related to brain function and perception. Main topics include neural dynamics and brain function, visual perception and processing mechanisms, face recognition and perception, functional brain connectivity studies, visual attention and saliency detection, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Kendrick Kay has contributed to numerous publications across various scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Nature Communications
  • 2022 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kendrick Kay demonstrate research across multiple aspects of neuroscience and brain imaging. Notable papers are:

  • "A massive 7T fMRI dataset to bridge cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence," 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Extensive sampling for complete models of individual brains," 2021, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "Frontostriatal salience network expansion in individuals in depression," 2024, Nature
  • "Improving the accuracy of single-trial fMRI response estimates using GLMsingle," 2022, eLife
  • "Better models of human high-level visual cortex emerge from natural language supervision with a large and diverse dataset," 2023, Nature Machine Intelligence

Frequent collaborators include Thomas Naselaris, Emily Allen, Yihan Wu, Ian Charest, and another record of co-authoring with Thomas Naselaris.

The body of Kendrick Kay's work is situated at the intersection of neuroscience and computational methods, contributing significant data and models to understand brain function, visual processing, and related cognitive phenomena. Their contributions span experimental designs, imaging techniques, and computational models to explore neural connectivity and behavior.

Best Publications

  • Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

    Kendrick N. Kay;Thomas Naselaris;Ryan J. Prenger;Jack L. Gallant;Jack L. Gallant

  • Encoding and decoding in fMRI.

    Thomas Naselaris;Kendrick N. Kay;Shinji Nishimoto;Jack L. Gallant;Jack L. Gallant

  • A massive 7T fMRI dataset to bridge cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence

    Unknown

  • Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity

    Thomas Naselaris;Ryan J. Prenger;Kendrick N. Kay;Michael Oliver

  • Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex

    Kendrick N. Kay;Jonathan Winawer;Aviv Mezer;Brian A. Wandell

  • Quantifying the local tissue volume and composition in individual brains with magnetic resonance imaging.

    Aviv Mezer;Jason D. Yeatman;Nikola Stikov;Kendrick N. Kay

  • Evaluation and statistical inference for human connectomes

    Franco Pestilli;Jason D Yeatman;Ariel Rokem;Kendrick N Kay

  • The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Kevin S. Weiner;Kendrick Kay;Jesse Gomez

  • GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data.

    Kendrick N. Kay;Ariel Rokem;Jonathan Winawer;Robert F. Dougherty

  • Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex

    Kendrick N. Kay;Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • The Human Connectome Project 7 Tesla retinotopy dataset: Description and population receptive field analysis.

    Noah C. Benson;Keith W. Jamison;Keith W. Jamison;Michael J. Arcaro;An T. Vu

  • Topographic organization in and near human visual area V4.

    Kathleen A. Hansen;Kendrick N. Kay;Jack L. Gallant

  • Asynchronous broadband signals are the principal source of the BOLD response in human visual cortex

    Jonathan Winawer;Kendrick N. Kay;Brett L. Foster;Andreas M. Rauschecker

  • Improving the accuracy of single-trial fMRI response estimates using GLMsingle

    Unknown

  • Bottom-up and top-down computations in word- and face-selective cortex

    Kendrick N Kay;Jason D Yeatman

  • Reward Motivation Enhances Task Coding in Frontoparietal Cortex

    Joset A. Etzel;Michael W. Cole;Jeffrey M. Zacks;Kendrick N. Kay

  • Extensive sampling for complete models of individual brains

    Thomas Naselaris;Emily J Allen;Kendrick Kay

  • A critical assessment of data quality and venous effects in sub-millimeter fMRI.

    Kendrick N. Kay;Keith W. Jamison;Luca Vizioli;Ruyuan Zhang

  • Evaluating the Accuracy of Diffusion MRI Models in White Matter

    Ariel Rokem;Jason D. Yeatman;Franco Pestilli;Kendrick N. Kay

  • Fixed versus mixed RSA: Explaining visual representations by fixed and mixed feature sets from shallow and deep computational models

    Seyed Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi;Linda Henriksson;Kendrick Kay;Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

  • A two-stage cascade model of BOLD responses in human visual cortex.

    Kendrick N. Kay;Jonathan Winawer;Ariel Rokem;Aviv Mezer

  • Resolving Ambiguities of MVPA Using Explicit Models of Representation

    Thomas Naselaris;Kendrick N. Kay

  • Principles for models of neural information processing.

    Kendrick N. Kay

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Winawer
Jonathan Winawer New York University
Jack L. Gallant
Jack L. Gallant University of California, Berkeley
Kalanit Grill-Spector
Kalanit Grill-Spector Stanford University
Kevin S. Weiner
Kevin S. Weiner University of California, Berkeley
Brian A. Wandell
Brian A. Wandell Stanford University
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte Columbia University
Kamil Ugurbil
Kamil Ugurbil University of Minnesota
Stephen A. Engel
Stephen A. Engel University of Minnesota
David J. Heeger
David J. Heeger New York University
Franco Pestilli
Franco Pestilli The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore the possibilities of studying Neuroscience in the USA, it's valuable to consider flexible alternatives that can support your ambitions or broaden your expertise. Many professionals enhance their credentials and skills through best online certificate programs that offer specialization in high-paying fields, such as healthcare, data analysis, or psychology.

If you’re looking for accessible options, you might be interested in the easiest online college degrees and majors. These can be a smart entry point for anyone seeking a manageable workload while still advancing their educational goals.

For those drawn to fields like mental health, social work, or behavioral sciences, affordability is crucial. Explore cheap online msw programs to gain qualifications for impactful careers while minimizing student debt. Similarly, pursuing bcba certification programs online prepares graduates for board-certified behavior analyst roles—a great fit for career changers or neuroscience students seeking specialized, in-demand work.

Combining neuroscience with these online pathways opens doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities across education, healthcare, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Kendrick Kay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles