World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
8353
World Ranking
7790
National Ranking
3346

Kevin S. Weiner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kevin S. Weiner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin S. Weiner is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Their work integrates topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, neural dynamics and brain function, memory and neural mechanisms, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

The scientist has contributed to understanding the structural and functional properties of the human brain, often investigating sulcal depth and its relationship to cognitive functions. Their research topics include visual perception and processing mechanisms, face recognition and perception, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Kevin S. Weiner has coauthored numerous papers with a range of researchers, including Ethan H. Willbrand, Willa I. Voorhies, Jacob A. Miller, Benjamin J. Parker, and Silvia A. Bunge. Collaborative efforts with these frequent coauthors have resulted in multiple research outputs exploring brain structure and function.

Publications featuring Kevin S. Weiner appear most often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Structure and Function
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Cerebral Cortex

Among recent papers, notable titles include:

  • Overlooked Tertiary Sulci Serve as a Meso-Scale Link between Microstructural and Functional Properties of Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Cognitive insights from tertiary sulci in prefrontal cortex, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Sulcal Depth in the Medial Ventral Temporal Cortex Predicts the Location of a Place-Selective Region in Macaques, Children, and Adults, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • Ultra-high-resolution fMRI of Human Ventral Temporal Cortex Reveals Differential Representation of Categories and Domains, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Sulcal depth in prefrontal cortex: a novel predictor of working memory performance, 2022, Cerebral Cortex

The primary fields of study for Kevin S. Weiner encompass neuroscience broadly, with subfields including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Best Publications

  • The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization.

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Kevin S. Weiner

  • The anatomical and functional specialization of the fusiform gyrus

    Kevin S. Weiner;Karl Zilles

  • Electrical Stimulation of Human Fusiform Face-Selective Regions Distorts Face Perception

    Josef Parvizi;Corentin Jacques;Corentin Jacques;Brett L. Foster;Nathan Withoft

  • Neural Representations of Faces and Body Parts in Macaque and Human Cortex: A Comparative fMRI Study

    Mark A. Pinsk;Michael Arcaro;Kevin S. Weiner;Kevin S. Weiner;Jan F. Kalkus

  • Apparent thinning of human visual cortex during childhood is associated with myelination

    Vaidehi S. Natu;Vaidehi S. Natu;Jesse Gomez;Michael Barnett;Brianna Jeska

  • Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex.

    Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Kevin S. Weiner;Kendrick Kay;Jesse Gomez

  • The vertical occipital fasciculus: A century of controversy resolved by in vivo measurements

    Jason D. Yeatman;Jason D. Yeatman;Kevin S. Weiner;Franco Pestilli;Ariel Rokem

  • The mid-fusiform sulcus: a landmark identifying both cytoarchitectonic and functional divisions of human ventral temporal cortex.

    Kevin S. Weiner;Golijeh Golarai;Julian Caspers;Miguel R. Chuapoco

  • Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle

    Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • Topographic maps in human frontal cortex revealed in memory-guided saccade and spatial working-memory tasks

    Sabine Kastner;Kevin DeSimone;Christina S. Konen;Sara M. Szczepanski

  • Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex

    Kendrick N. Kay;Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • Electrical Stimulation of the Left and Right Human Fusiform Gyrus Causes Different Effects in Conscious Face Perception

    Vinitha Rangarajan;Dora Hermes;Brett L. Foster;Kevin S. Weiner

  • Temporal Processing Capacity in High-Level Visual Cortex Is Domain Specific.

    Anthony Stigliani;Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • Functional Heterogeneity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Across Attention and Episodic Memory Retrieval

    J. Benjamin Hutchinson;Melina R. Uncapher;Kevin S. Weiner;David W. Bressler

  • Not one extrastriate body area: Using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortex

    Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • Microstructural proliferation in human cortex is coupled with the development of face processing

    Jesse Gomez;Michael A. Barnett;Vaidehi Natu;Aviv Mezer

  • The improbable simplicity of the fusiform face area.

    Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • fMRI-Adaptation and Category Selectivity in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex: Regional Differences Across Time Scales

    Kevin S. Weiner;Rory Sayres;Joakim Vinberg;Kalanit Grill-Spector

  • Two New Cytoarchitectonic Areas on the Human Mid-Fusiform Gyrus

    Simon Lorenz;Kevin S. Weiner;Julian Caspers;Julian Caspers;Hartmut Mohlberg

  • Synchrony upon repetition: One or multiple neural mechanisms?

    Kevin S. Weiner;Kalanit Grill-Spector

Frequent Co-Authors

Kalanit Grill-Spector
Kalanit Grill-Spector Stanford University
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Kendrick Kay
Kendrick Kay University of Minnesota
Corentin Jacques
Corentin Jacques Université Catholique de Louvain
Silvia A. Bunge
Silvia A. Bunge University of California, Berkeley
Brian A. Wandell
Brian A. Wandell Stanford University
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Josef Parvizi
Josef Parvizi Stanford University
Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens up a range of career options. Students interested in lucrative opportunities may want to explore the most lucrative college degrees related to health, technology, and science. Pairing neuroscience with complementary majors can further increase earning potential after graduation.

Many learners are also interested in affordability and convenience. If you’re watching your budget, check out these cheapest online college options that accept FAFSA. Online study makes it easier to balance education with other commitments and can save on transportation or housing costs.

For those seeking qualifications that are quicker to earn, there are easy licenses and certifications to get online. These certifications can boost your resume and open doors to entry-level roles or specialized tracks within the neuroscience field.

Finally, if you want to explore diverse fields or make a career pivot, browse the best online degree programs for flexible options. With the rise of virtual learning, more students are able to access quality education and promising career pathways in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin S. Weiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles