World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
96
Citations
30132
World Ranking
744
National Ranking
466

Neuroscience

D-Index
96
Citations
30457
World Ranking
873
National Ranking
469

Marlene Behrmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlene Behrmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 459 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marlene Behrmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlene Behrmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2015 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Marlene Behrmann is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specialization in cognitive neuroscience. The subfields of their work include psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics investigated in their research cover face recognition and perception, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Michael C. Granovetter, Christina Patterson, David C. Plaut, Sophia Robert, and Nicholas M. Blauch.

Behrmann's recent papers include the following:

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups (2020, American Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Consortium neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: The ENIGMA adventure (2020, Human Brain Mapping)
  • Hemispheric Organization for Visual Object Recognition: A Theoretical Account and Empirical Evidence (2020, Perception)
  • Does the brain's ventral visual pathway compute object shape? (2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  • Computational insights into human perceptual expertise for familiar and unfamiliar face recognition (2020, Cognition)

The scientist publishes frequently in several venues, such as Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Journal of Vision, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Trends in Cognitive Sciences, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Among awards received, Marlene Behrmann was named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2019 and became a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015.

Best Publications

  • What is special about face recognition? nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition

    Morris Moscovitch;Gordon Winocur;Marlene Behrmann

  • Parietal Cortex and Attention

    Marlene Behrmann;Joy J Geng;Sarah Shomstein

  • Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas

    Uri Hasson;If At Levy;If At Levy;Marlene Behrmann;Talma Hendler;Talma Hendler

  • Cortical and Subcortical Brain Morphometry Differences Between Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: Results From the ENIGMA ASD Working Group

    Daan van Rooij;Evdokia Anagnostou;Celso Arango;Guillaume Auzias

  • Seeing it differently: visual processing in autism

    Marlene Behrmann;Cibu Thomas;Kate Humphreys

  • Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth

    Marlene Behrmann;Galia Avidan

  • Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories.

    K. Suzanne Scherf;Marlene Behrmann;Kate Humphreys;Beatriz Luna

  • The idiosyncratic brain: distortion of spontaneous connectivity patterns in autism spectrum disorder

    Avital Hahamy;Marlene Behrmann;Rafael Malach

  • Disrupted neural synchronization in toddlers with autism

    Ilan Dinstein;Ilan Dinstein;Karen Pierce;Lisa Eyler;Stephanie Solso

  • Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing

    Marlene Behrmann;Galia Avidan;Grace Lee Leonard;Rutie Kimchi

  • Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition

    Isabel Gauthier;Marlene Behrmann;Michael J. Tarr

  • A mirror up to nature.

    Ilan Dinstein;Cibu Thomas;Marlene Behrmann;David J. Heeger;David J. Heeger

  • Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search

    Joy J. Geng;Joy J. Geng;Marlene Behrmann

  • Reduced structural connectivity in ventral visual cortex in congenital prosopagnosia.

    Cibu Thomas;Galia Avidan;Kate Humphreys;Kwan-jin Jung

  • The cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery

    S. M. Kosslyn;M. Behrmann;Marc Jeannerod

  • Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex

    Chris I. Baker;Marlene Behrmann;Marlene Behrmann;Marlene Behrmann;Carl R. Olson;Carl R. Olson;Carl R. Olson

  • Long-term semantic priming: a computational account and empirical evidence.

    Suzanna Becker;Morris Moscovitch;Marlene Behrmann;Steve Joordens

  • A fine-grained analysis of facial expression processing in high-functioning adults with autism.

    Kate Humphreys;Nancy Minshew;Grace Lee Leonard;Marlene Behrmann

  • Anatomical Abnormalities in Autism

    Shlomi Haar;Sigal Berman;Marlene Behrmann;Ilan Dinstein

  • Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition

    Marlene Behrmann;David C. Plaut

  • What is special about face recognition

    Morris Moscovitch;Gordon Winocur;Marlene Behrmann

  • FAST-TRACK REPORT Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories

    K. Suzanne Scherf;Marlene Behrmann;Kate Humphreys;Beatriz Luna

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Plaut
David C. Plaut Carnegie Mellon University
Galia Avidan
Galia Avidan Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
David J. Heeger
David J. Heeger New York University
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Michael J. Tarr
Michael J. Tarr Carnegie Mellon University
Nancy J. Minshew
Nancy J. Minshew University of Pittsburgh
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Beatriz Luna
Beatriz Luna University of Pittsburgh
Ruth Kimchi
Ruth Kimchi University of Haifa
Joy J. Geng
Joy J. Geng University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a range of online options and career pathways, including counseling and licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Many states have unique requirements, so it’s important to understand the specifics before choosing your pathway.

For those exploring licensure, the lpc license requirements in Maryland highlight key eligibility steps such as completing an accredited graduate program and earning supervised clinical experience. Meanwhile, Massachusetts lpc licensure requirements include passing the National Clinical Mental Health Counseling Examination and meeting continuing education standards.

In different regions, the process can vary further. For example, Michigan lpc licensure requirements outline specific coursework and post-degree experience, while lpc licensure requirements in Minnesota emphasize a combination of education, examination, and supervised practice.

When considering an online psychology degree, review state licensure requirements early. Doing so ensures your education aligns with your career goals and legal requirements for counseling practice in your chosen state.

Best Scientists Citing Marlene Behrmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles