World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bradley Duchaine

Bradley Duchaine

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
17441
World Ranking
2691
National Ranking
1548

Bradley Duchaine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Duchaine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bradley Duchaine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Duchaine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley Duchaine is a researcher affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Computer Science, with 14 publications in Neuroscience and 10 in Computer Science. Their work often intersects with subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology.

Duchaine's main research topics include Face Recognition and Perception, with 22 publications relating to this subject, as well as Face recognition and analysis. Additional areas of focus are Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Visual Attention and Saliency Detection, Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research, Memory Processes and Influences, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

The researcher has published frequently in several venues, with notable publication counts in these journals:

  • Journal of Vision (4 publications)
  • Behavior Research Methods (2 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2 publications)
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology (1 publication)
  • The FASEB Journal (1 publication)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Duchaine are:

  • The Oxford Face Matching Test: A non-biased test of the full range of individual differences in face perception (2021, Behavior Research Methods)
  • Introducing the female Cambridge face memory test - long form (F-CFMT+) (2022, Behavior Research Methods)
  • Attentional modulation differentially affects ventral and dorsal face areas in both normal participants and developmental prosopagnosics (2020, Cognitive Neuropsychology)
  • ON THE ROLE OF TERTIARY SULCI IN DEVELOPMENTAL PROSOPAGNOSIA (2020, The FASEB Journal)
  • This condition impacts every aspect of my life: A survey to understand the experience of living with developmental prosopagnosia (2025, PLoS ONE)

Frequent coauthors in their research include Mirta Stantić, Caroline Catmur, Geoffrey Bird, Guo Jiahui, and Rebecca Brewer, with collaboration counts ranging from two to three joint publications.

In terms of book publications, Duchaine has contributed to Psychology Press eBooks with a publication titled SelectDeficits in Developmental Cognitive Neuropsychology, released in 2024.

Best Publications

  • The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.

    Brad Duchaine;Ken Nakayama

  • Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments

    Laura Germine;Laura Germine;Ken Nakayama;Bradley C. Duchaine;Christopher F. Chabris

  • Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability

    Richard Russell;Brad Duchaine;Ken Nakayama

  • Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable

    Jeremy B. Wilmer;Laura Germine;Christopher F. Chabris;Garga Chatterjee

  • Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces

    Elinor McKone;Nancy Kanwisher;Bradley C. Duchaine

  • TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing

    David Pitcher;Vincent Walsh;Galit Yovel;Bradley Duchaine

  • A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing

    Brad Duchaine;Galit Yovel

  • The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network.

    David Pitcher;Vincent Walsh;Bradley Duchaine

  • Family resemblance: ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia.

    Bradley Duchaine;Laura Germine;Ken Nakayama

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Disrupts the Perception and Embodiment of Facial Expressions

    D Pitcher;L Garrido;Walsh;BC Duchaine

  • Where cognitive development and aging meet: face learning ability peaks after age 30.

    Laura T. Germine;Bradley Duchaine;Ken Nakayama

  • Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test

    Devin C. Bowles;Elinor McKone;Amy Dawel;Bradley Duchaine

  • Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex

    David Pitcher;Lucie Charles;Joseph T. Devlin;Vincent Walsh

  • Developmental prosopagnosia: a window to content-specific face processing.

    Bradley C Duchaine;Ken Nakayama

  • Evolutionary psychology and the brain.

    Bradley Duchaine;Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia

    Brad Duchaine;Ken Nakayama

  • Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case

    Bradley C. Duchaine;Galit Yovel;Edward J. Butterworth;Ken Nakayama

  • Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior

    Constantin Rezlescu;Brad Duchaine;Christopher Yves Olivola;Nick Chater

  • The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area

    Jennifer K E Steeves;Jody C Culham;Bradley C Duchaine;Cristiana Cavina Pratesi

  • Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: A problem of recognition

    Lucy Yardley;Lisa McDermott;Stephanie Pisarski;Brad Duchaine

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken Nakayama
Ken Nakayama Harvard University
Jason J. S. Barton
Jason J. S. Barton University of British Columbia
Vincent Walsh
Vincent Walsh University College London
Galit Yovel
Galit Yovel Tel Aviv University
Christopher F. Chabris
Christopher F. Chabris Geisinger Health System
Michael J. Banissy
Michael J. Banissy Goldsmiths University of London
Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Elinor McKone
Elinor McKone Australian National University
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Giuseppe Iaria
Giuseppe Iaria University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can open many opportunities. Specializing in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is one such route, particularly if you wish to work as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). With demand growing across the country, it’s crucial to understand the certification process, which may vary by location.

For example, learn more about how to become a bcba in Oklahoma City or discover the specific bcba certification requirements in Omaha. Similarly, you can explore the path to certification by reading about bcba certification requirements in Orlando and what’s needed for becoming a bcba in Philadelphia.

Online programs in psychology and ABA allow for flexible learning, making them suitable for working professionals. Prospective students can tailor their education to regional licensing needs or personal interests, paving the way for rewarding roles in schools, clinics, or private practice.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley Duchaine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles