World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark A. Williams

Mark A. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5410
World Ranking
9528
National Ranking
551

Mark A. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Williams sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark A. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Williams is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and has focused research interests spanning medicine, neuroscience, and psychology. Their work encompasses multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, social psychology, infectious diseases, and epidemiology.

The scientist's research explores a range of topics such as neural dynamics and brain function, visual perception and processing mechanisms, eating disorders and behaviors, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, face recognition and perception, as well as EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Recent published papers by Mark A. Williams include the following:

  • A humanness dimension to visual object coding in the brain, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Motor neuroplasticity: A MEG-fMRI study of motor imagery and execution in healthy ageing, 2020, Neuropsychologia
  • Late disruption of central visual field disrupts peripheral perception of form and color, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Neural Response to Low Energy and High Energy Foods in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder: A Functional MRI Study, 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Geographic Accessibility of HIV Preventive Services for Young Latino Men in Miami, Florida: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2020, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark A. Williams include:

  • Mariano Kanamori
  • Cho-Hee Shrader
  • Anina N. Rich
  • Brooke Donnelly
  • Nasim Foroughi

The scientist's work has appeared repeatedly in notable publication venues such as:

  • NeuroImage
  • Neuropsychologia
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care

Best Publications

  • Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable

    Jeremy B. Wilmer;Laura Germine;Christopher F. Chabris;Garga Chatterjee

  • Amygdala Responses to Fearful and Happy Facial Expressions under Conditions of Binocular Suppression

    Mark A. Williams;Adam P. Morris;Adam P. Morris;Francis McGlone;David F. Abbott

  • fMRI Adaptation Reveals Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Parietal Cortex

    Trevor T.-J. Chong;Ross Cunnington;Mark A. Williams;Nancy Kanwisher

  • Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex.

    Mark A Williams;Mark A Williams;Chris I Baker;Hans P Op de Beeck;Won Mok Shim;Won Mok Shim

  • Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions

    Mark A Williams;Simon Andrew Moss;John L Bradshaw;Jason B Mattingley

  • Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance

    Mark A Williams;Sabin Dang;Nancy G Kanwisher;Nancy G Kanwisher;Nancy G Kanwisher

  • Differential amygdala responses to happy and fearful facial expressions depend on selective attention.

    Mark A. Williams;Francis McGlone;David F. Abbott;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Neural correlates of imagined and synaesthetic colours

    Anina N. Rich;Mark A. Williams;Mark A. Williams;Aina Puce;Aina Puce;Ari Syngeniotis

  • Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation

    Trevor T.-J. Chong;Mark A. Williams;Ross Cunnington;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.

    Regine Zopf;Greg Savage;Mark A. Williams

  • Aging and large-scale functional networks: white matter integrity, gray matter volume, and functional connectivity in the resting state.

    Lars Marstaller;M. Williams;A. Rich;G. Savage

  • Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm

    Hana Burianova;Lars Marstaller;Paul F. Sowman;Graciela Tesan

  • The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.

    Trevor T.-J. Chong;Ross Cunnington;Mark A. Williams;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Emotional expressions evoke a differential response in the fusiform face area.

    Bronson Blake Harry;Mark Williams;Chris Davis;Jeesun Kim

  • Do angry men get noticed

    Mark A. Williams;Mark A. Williams;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Flexible coding of task rules in frontoparietal cortex: An adaptive system for flexible cognitive control

    Alexandra Woolgar;Soheil Afshar;Mark A. Williams;Anina N. Rich

  • Feature-selective attention in frontoparietal cortex: Multivoxel codes adjust to prioritize task-relevant information

    Jade Jackson;Anina N. Rich;Mark A. Williams;Alexandra Woolgar

  • Attention enhances multi-voxel representation of novel objects in frontal, parietal and visual cortices.

    Alexandra Woolgar;Mark A. Williams;Anina N. Rich

  • Is delayed foveal feedback critical for extra-foveal perception?

    Christopher D. Chambers;Christopher P.G. Allen;Leah Maizey;Mark A. Williams

  • Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching

    Regine Zopf;Sandra Truong;Matthew Finkbeiner;Jason Friedman

  • The brain effects of laser acupuncture in healthy individuals: An fMRI investigation

    Im Quah-Smith;Perminder S. Sachdev;Wei Wen;Xiaohua Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Anina N. Rich
Anina N. Rich Macquarie University
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Ross Cunnington
Ross Cunnington University of Queensland
Greg Savage
Greg Savage Macquarie University
Francis McGlone
Francis McGlone Liverpool John Moores University
Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Romina Palermo
Romina Palermo University of Western Australia
Juthathip Mongkolsapaya
Juthathip Mongkolsapaya University of Oxford
Thomas A. Carlson
Thomas A. Carlson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse academic and professional opportunities. One advanced option is a doctorate in neuropsychology online, ideal for those interested in understanding the complex relationships between the brain and behavior. This program prepares students for careers in research, academia, or advanced clinical practice.

If you’re seeking a faster route to enter the helping professions, consider the shortest online degree in human services. These programs can quickly equip you with the skills needed for entry-level roles in social work, case management, or community outreach.

For students passionate about athletics and performance, it’s worth exploring what jobs can you get with a sports psychology degree. Career options include working as a performance coach, sports counselor, or wellness consultant within schools, teams, or private practice.

Lastly, earning a master’s degree expands your career options. Learn more about what to do with masters in psychology, from clinical work and organizational consulting to research roles or pursuing doctoral study.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles