World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4112
World Ranking
10611
National Ranking
610

Anina N. Rich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anina N. Rich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anina N. Rich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anina N. Rich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anina N. Rich is a researcher affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia, specializing in the field of Neuroscience. Their work primarily focuses on Cognitive Neuroscience and extends into related areas including Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, prominently involving:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Recent publications by Anina N. Rich include:

  • Perceptual difficulty modulates the direction of information flow in familiar face recognition, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Concurrent neuroimaging and neurostimulation reveals a causal role for dlPFC in coding of task-relevant information, 2021, Communications Biology
  • The time-course of feature-based attention effects dissociated from temporal expectation and target-related processes, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • The Influence of Object-Color Knowledge on Emerging Object Representations in the Brain, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Anina N. Rich has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Alexandra Woolgar, Denise Moerel, Hamid Karimi-Rouzbahani, Lina Teichmann, and Sophie Smit. These collaborators have contributed to multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships in their areas of interest.

The researcher has published extensively in notable scientific venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Vision, NeuroImage, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Neuroscience. Among these, bioRxiv hosts the greatest number of their contributions.

Anina N. Rich's body of work integrates experimental approaches and neuroimaging techniques to explore brain mechanisms underlying perception, attention, and cognition. Their studies often investigate how neural representations are formed and modulated during complex cognitive tasks, providing insights into both typical and atypical brain functions.

Best Publications

  • A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations

    Anina N. Rich;John L. Bradshaw;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Unconscious priming eliminates automatic binding of colour and alphanumeric form in synaesthesia

    Jason B. Mattingley;Anina N. Rich;Greg Yelland;John L. Bradshaw

  • Anomalous perception in synaesthesia: a cognitive neuroscience perspective.

    Anina N. Rich;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect

    Anina N Rich;Anina N Rich;Anina N Rich;Melina A Kunar;Michael J Van Wert;Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo

  • Do synaesthetic colours act as unique features in visual search

    Jessica Ruth Price Edquist;Anina Rich;Cobie Brinkman;Jason B Mattingley

  • Color Channels, Not Color Appearance or Color Categories, Guide Visual Search for Desaturated Color Targets

    Delwin T. Lindsey;Angela M. Brown;Ester Reijnen;Anina N. Rich

  • Neural correlates of imagined and synaesthetic colours

    Anina N. Rich;Mark A. Williams;Mark A. Williams;Aina Puce;Aina Puce;Ari Syngeniotis

  • Aging and large-scale functional networks: white matter integrity, gray matter volume, and functional connectivity in the resting state.

    Lars Marstaller;M. Williams;A. Rich;G. Savage

  • Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting.

    Rocco Yao-Ching Chiou;Anina N Rich

  • Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm

    Hana Burianova;Lars Marstaller;Paul F. Sowman;Graciela Tesan

  • Attentional Load Attenuates Synaesthetic Priming Effects in Grapheme-Colour Synaesthesia

    Jason B. Mattingley;Jonathan M. Payne;Anina N. Rich

  • Flexible coding of task rules in frontoparietal cortex: An adaptive system for flexible cognitive control

    Alexandra Woolgar;Soheil Afshar;Mark A. Williams;Anina N. Rich

  • Feature-selective attention in frontoparietal cortex: Multivoxel codes adjust to prioritize task-relevant information

    Jade Jackson;Anina N. Rich;Mark A. Williams;Alexandra Woolgar

  • Attention enhances multi-voxel representation of novel objects in frontal, parietal and visual cortices.

    Alexandra Woolgar;Mark A. Williams;Anina N. Rich

  • The role of conceptual knowledge in understanding synaesthesia: Evaluating contemporary findings from a "hub-and-spokes" perspective.

    Rocco Chiou;Anina N. Rich

  • Independent Sampling of Features Enables Conscious Perception of Bound Objects

    Edward Vul;Anina N. Rich

  • Mirror-sensory synaesthesia: exploring 'shared' sensory experiences as synaesthesia.

    Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon;Peter G. Enticott;Anina N. Rich;Melita J. Giummarra

  • Induced and evoked neural correlates of orientation selectivity in human visual cortex.

    Loes Koelewijn;Loes Koelewijn;Julie R. Dumont;Suresh Daniel Muthukumaraswamy;Anina N. Rich

  • The effects of stimulus competition and voluntary attention on colour-graphemic synaesthesia.

    Anina N. Rich;Jason B. Mattingley

  • The Nature and Origin of Cross-Modal Associations to Odours

    Richard J Stevenson;Anina Rich;Alex Russell

  • Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon;Peter G. Enticott;Anina N. Rich;Melita J. Giummarra

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams Macquarie University
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Thomas A. Carlson
Thomas A. Carlson University of Sydney
Jeremy M. Wolfe
Jeremy M. Wolfe Brigham and Women's Hospital
Todd S. Horowitz
Todd S. Horowitz National Institutes of Health
John L. Bradshaw
John L. Bradshaw Monash University
Richard J. Stevenson
Richard J. Stevenson Macquarie University
Greg Savage
Greg Savage Macquarie University
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy
Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy University of Auckland
Krish D. Singh
Krish D. Singh Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a wide range of online study options and exciting career paths. One especially popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role with increasing demand across the country. To qualify as a BCBA, you typically need a graduate-level education and supervised fieldwork, followed by passing a national certification exam.

The process and bcba certification requirements in Austin may vary from those in other cities. Professionals planning to work in California, for instance, should familiarize themselves with the how to become a bcba in Bakersfield guidelines. If you're interested in working in the Northeast, the Baltimore bcba requirements offer another perspective to consider. Meanwhile, those in Idaho can review the bcba certification requirements in Boise for local regulations.

Exploring these various requirements will help you choose the right online degree and certification path, aligning your education with your career aspirations and local job markets in psychology and behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Anina N. Rich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles