World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6136 5703 47 45 177 9877

Aymeric Guillot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aymeric Guillot between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aymeric Guillot published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2012. 20 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2012. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
2003 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aymeric Guillot: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 6
2009 12
2010 14
2011 13
2012 22
2013 14
2014 16
2015 12
2016 3
2017 7
2018 5
2019 11
2020 12
2021 11
2022 9
2023 8
2024 10
2025 10
Total 211
Download as CSV

Aymeric Guillot publications per year - data summary

  • Aymeric Guillot, a Psychology scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, has 211 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2003 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2006, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.2 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 48 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2003-2010: 48 publications (6.0 per year); 2011-2018: 92 publications (11.5 per year); 2019-2025: 71 publications (10.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Aymeric Guillot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aymeric Guillot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 177
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Aymeric Guillot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Aymeric Guillot, a Psychology scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, records 177 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Aymeric Guillot, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Aymeric Guillot ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Aymeric Guillot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aymeric Guillot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Aymeric Guillot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Aymeric Guillot, a Psychology scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, records 47 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Aymeric Guillot, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Aymeric Guillot ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Aymeric Guillot is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France. Their research spans multiple disciplines including neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with a significant output in cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology, as well as orthopedics and sports medicine.

The primary fields of study in Guillot's work are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these broad areas, Guillot has contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Social Psychology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research topics mainly focus on:

  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Sports Injuries and Prevention
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies

Guillot has published research in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Among Guillot's recent published papers are:

  • From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance (2021) - International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • French translation and validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-third version (MIQ-3f) (2020) - Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité

Other significant papers highly cited include:

  • Tensorpac: An open-source Python toolbox for tensor-based phase-amplitude coupling measurement in electrophysiological brain signals (2020) - PLoS Computational Biology
  • Selective Effects of Manual Massage and Foam Rolling on Perceived Recovery and Performance: Current Knowledge and Future Directions Toward Robotic Massages (2020) - Frontiers in Physiology
  • Motor imagery and action observation following immobilization-induced hypoactivity: A narrative review (2021) - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Guillot collaborates frequently with a number of researchers. Most noted frequent co-authors are:

  • Franck Di Rienzo
  • Ursula Debarnot
  • Christian Collet
  • Sébastien Daligault
  • Sophie Schlatter

Best Publications

  • Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet;Vo An Nguyen;Francine Malouin;Francine Malouin

  • Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet;Vo An Nguyen;Francine Malouin;Francine Malouin

  • Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Duration of Mentally Simulated Movement: A Review

    A Guillot;C Collet

  • Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation

    Stefan Vogt;Franck Di Rienzo;Christian Collet;Allan Collins

  • Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition

    Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot;Frank Di Rienzo;Tadhg E. MacIntyre;Aidan P. Moran

  • Re‐imagining motor imagery: Building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology

    Aidan Moran;Aymeric Guillot;Tadhg MacIntyre;Christian Collet

  • Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning

    Aymeric Guillot;Stéphane Champely;Christophe Batier;Patrice Thiriet

  • Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability

    Nicolas Robin;Laurent Dominique;Lucette Toussaint;Yannick Blandin

  • Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types.

    A Guillot;F Lebon;David Rouffet;S Champely

  • Measuring Motor Imagery Using Psychometric, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Tools

    Christian Collet;Aymeric Guillot;Florent Lebon;Tadhg MacIntyre

  • Experts bodies, experts minds: How physical and mental training shape the brain

    Ursula Debarnot;Ursula Debarnot;Marco Sperduti;Franck Di Rienzo;Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot

  • Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength.

    Florent Lebon;Christian Collet;Aymeric Guillot

  • Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies

    C Collet;A Guillot;C Petit

  • The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Effectiveness of three-dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context.

    Nady Hoyek;Christian Collet;Franck Di Rienzo;Mickael De Almeida

  • Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions

    Aymeric Guillot;Nady Hoyek;Magali Louis;Christian Collet

  • Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning.

    Nady Hoyek;Christian Collet;Olivier Rastello;Patrick Fargier

  • Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

    Franck Di Rienzo;Christian Collet;Nady Hoyek;Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Collet
Christian Collet Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Aidan Moran
Aidan Moran University College Dublin
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Gilles Rode
Gilles Rode Hospices Civils de Lyon
Karim Jerbi
Karim Jerbi University of Montreal
Eric R. Igou
Eric R. Igou University of Limerick
Philip L. Jackson
Philip L. Jackson Université Laval
Sophie Schwartz
Sophie Schwartz University of Geneva
Virginie Sterpenich
Virginie Sterpenich University of Geneva
Pascale Piolino
Pascale Piolino Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens many career pathways, especially in school counseling. Across the USA, specific educational and certification requirements vary from state to state. For example, if you're interested in becoming a school counselor, it's important to understand the Ohio school counselor education requirements, which may differ from those in other regions.

Similarly, if you plan to work in Oklahoma, you’ll need to be familiar with how to become a school counselor in Oklahoma. Each state specifies its own coursework, supervised experience, and licensing or certification tests.

For those considering Oregon, review the requirements to be a school counselor in Oregon to understand degree prerequisites and fieldwork expectations. Likewise, if Pennsylvania is your destination, take time to learn about becoming a school counselor in Pennsylvania.

When researching online psychology degrees, always consider each state’s unique credentialing process to align your studies and career path with your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Aymeric Guillot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles