World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9877
World Ranking
6136
National Ranking
47

Aymeric Guillot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aymeric Guillot sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Aymeric Guillot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aymeric Guillot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aymeric Guillot is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France. Their research spans multiple disciplines including neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with a significant output in cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology, as well as orthopedics and sports medicine.

The primary fields of study in Guillot's work are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these broad areas, Guillot has contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Social Psychology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research topics mainly focus on:

  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Sports Injuries and Prevention
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies

Guillot has published research in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Among Guillot's recent published papers are:

  • From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance (2021) - International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • French translation and validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-third version (MIQ-3f) (2020) - Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité

Other significant papers highly cited include:

  • Tensorpac: An open-source Python toolbox for tensor-based phase-amplitude coupling measurement in electrophysiological brain signals (2020) - PLoS Computational Biology
  • Selective Effects of Manual Massage and Foam Rolling on Perceived Recovery and Performance: Current Knowledge and Future Directions Toward Robotic Massages (2020) - Frontiers in Physiology
  • Motor imagery and action observation following immobilization-induced hypoactivity: A narrative review (2021) - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Guillot collaborates frequently with a number of researchers. Most noted frequent co-authors are:

  • Franck Di Rienzo
  • Ursula Debarnot
  • Christian Collet
  • Sébastien Daligault
  • Sophie Schlatter

Best Publications

  • Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet;Vo An Nguyen;Francine Malouin;Francine Malouin

  • Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet;Vo An Nguyen;Francine Malouin;Francine Malouin

  • Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Duration of Mentally Simulated Movement: A Review

    A Guillot;C Collet

  • Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery.

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation

    Stefan Vogt;Franck Di Rienzo;Christian Collet;Allan Collins

  • Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition

    Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot;Frank Di Rienzo;Tadhg E. MacIntyre;Aidan P. Moran

  • Re‐imagining motor imagery: Building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology

    Aidan Moran;Aymeric Guillot;Tadhg MacIntyre;Christian Collet

  • Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning

    Aymeric Guillot;Stéphane Champely;Christophe Batier;Patrice Thiriet

  • Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability

    Nicolas Robin;Laurent Dominique;Lucette Toussaint;Yannick Blandin

  • Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types.

    A Guillot;F Lebon;David Rouffet;S Champely

  • Measuring Motor Imagery Using Psychometric, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Tools

    Christian Collet;Aymeric Guillot;Florent Lebon;Tadhg MacIntyre

  • Experts bodies, experts minds: How physical and mental training shape the brain

    Ursula Debarnot;Ursula Debarnot;Marco Sperduti;Franck Di Rienzo;Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot

  • Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength.

    Florent Lebon;Christian Collet;Aymeric Guillot

  • Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies

    C Collet;A Guillot;C Petit

  • The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery

    Aymeric Guillot;Christian Collet

  • Effectiveness of three-dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context.

    Nady Hoyek;Christian Collet;Franck Di Rienzo;Mickael De Almeida

  • Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions

    Aymeric Guillot;Nady Hoyek;Magali Louis;Christian Collet

  • Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning.

    Nady Hoyek;Christian Collet;Olivier Rastello;Patrick Fargier

  • Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

    Franck Di Rienzo;Christian Collet;Nady Hoyek;Aymeric Guillot;Aymeric Guillot

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Collet
Christian Collet Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Aidan Moran
Aidan Moran University College Dublin
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Gilles Rode
Gilles Rode Hospices Civils de Lyon
Karim Jerbi
Karim Jerbi University of Montreal
Eric R. Igou
Eric R. Igou University of Limerick
Philip L. Jackson
Philip L. Jackson Université Laval
Sophie Schwartz
Sophie Schwartz University of Geneva
Virginie Sterpenich
Virginie Sterpenich University of Geneva
Pascale Piolino
Pascale Piolino Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens many career pathways, especially in school counseling. Across the USA, specific educational and certification requirements vary from state to state. For example, if you're interested in becoming a school counselor, it's important to understand the Ohio school counselor education requirements, which may differ from those in other regions.

Similarly, if you plan to work in Oklahoma, you’ll need to be familiar with how to become a school counselor in Oklahoma. Each state specifies its own coursework, supervised experience, and licensing or certification tests.

For those considering Oregon, review the requirements to be a school counselor in Oregon to understand degree prerequisites and fieldwork expectations. Likewise, if Pennsylvania is your destination, take time to learn about becoming a school counselor in Pennsylvania.

When researching online psychology degrees, always consider each state’s unique credentialing process to align your studies and career path with your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Aymeric Guillot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles