World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karen Caeyenberghs

Karen Caeyenberghs

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6208 5770 361 352 158 8134
Neuroscience 48 6205 5717 173 162 186 8453

Karen Caeyenberghs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen Caeyenberghs between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen Caeyenberghs published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 35 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 16 publications
2005 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen Caeyenberghs: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 7
2010 6
2011 7
2012 6
2013 8
2014 11
2015 22
2016 23
2017 18
2018 10
2019 23
2020 12
2021 11
2022 11
2023 11
2024 19
2025 16
Total 225
Download as CSV

Karen Caeyenberghs publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Caeyenberghs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 186
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen Caeyenberghs D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Caeyenberghs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen Caeyenberghs is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Epidemiology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The research topics covered by Karen Caeyenberghs include the following:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Frequent venues for publication include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • BMJ Open

Notable recent papers by Karen Caeyenberghs are:

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Fixel-based Analysis of Diffusion MRI: Methods, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities, 2021, NeuroImage
  • ENIGMA brain injury: Framework, challenges, and opportunities, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Navigating the link between processing speed and network communication in the human brain, 2021, Brain Structure and Function
  • Associations of cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise with brain white matter in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Brain Imaging and Behavior

Frequent collaborators include Juan F. Domínguez D, Andrei Irimia, Emily L. Dennis, Paul M. Thompson, and Elisabeth A. Wilde. The collaboration network demonstrates extensive engagement with fellow researchers in fields related to brain imaging and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Topological correlations of structural and functional networks in patients with traumatic brain injury

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Alexander Leemans;Inge Leunissen;Karla Michiels

  • Brain networks under attack: robustness properties and the impact of lesions

    Hannelore Aerts;Wim Fias;Karen Caeyenberghs;Daniele Marinazzo

  • Fixel-based Analysis of Diffusion MRI: Methods, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities.

    Thijs Dhollander;Adam Clemente;Mervyn Singh;Frederique Boonstra

  • Cognitive and neuroimaging findings in developmental coordination disorder: new insights from a systematic review of recent research

    Peter Wilson;Bouwein C.M. Smits-Engelsman;Karen Caeyenberghs;Bert Steenbergen

  • What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes

    Anna Aminov;Jeffrey M. Rogers;Sandy Middleton;Karen Caeyenberghs

  • Altered structural networks and executive deficits in traumatic brain injury patients

    K Caeyenberghs;A Leemans;Inge Leunissen;Jolien Gooijers

  • Overcoming the effects of false positives and threshold bias in graph theoretical analyses of neuroimaging data.

    Mark Drakesmith;Karen Caeyenberghs;A. Dutt;G. Lewis

  • Disruption of cerebral networks and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease

    Yael D. Reijmer;Alexander Leemans;Karen Caeyenberghs;Sophie M. Heringa

  • Graph analysis of functional brain networks for cognitive control of action in traumatic brain injury.

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Alexander Leemans;Marcus H. Heitger;Inge Leunissen

  • Neural underpinnings of impaired predictive motor timing in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.

    Julie Debrabant;Freja Gheysen;Karen Caeyenberghs;Karen Caeyenberghs;Hilde Van Waelvelde

  • Motor Imagery Development in Primary School Children

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Jenny Tsoupas;Peter H. Wilson;Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman

  • Longitudinal assessment of chemotherapy-induced changes in brain and cognitive functioning: A systematic review

    Mingmei Li;Karen Caeyenberghs

  • Gray Matter Abnormalities in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease: Evaluation by Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging and Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging.

    Koji Kamagata;Andrew Zalesky;Taku Hatano;Ryo Ueda

  • Mapping the functional connectome in traumatic brain injury: What can graph metrics tell us?

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Helena Verhelst;Adam Clemente;Peter H. Wilson

  • Brain connectivity and postural control in young traumatic brain injury patients: A diffusion MRI based network analysis.

    Karen Caeyenberghs;A. Leemans;C. De Decker;Marcus H. Heitger

  • Relations Between Brain Alterations and Clinical Pain Measures in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review

    Iris Coppieters;Mira Meeus;Mira Meeus;Jeroen Kregel;Jeroen Kregel;Karen Caeyenberghs;Karen Caeyenberghs

  • Brain-Behavior Relationships in Young Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: DTI Metrics are Highly Correlated with Postural Control

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Alexander Leemans;Alexander Leemans;Monique Geurts;Tom Taymans

  • Hemispheric lateralization of topological organization in structural brain networks

    Karen Caeyenberghs;Alexander Leemans

  • Task complexity and location specific changes of cortical thickness in executive and salience networks after working memory training

    Claudia Metzler-Baddeley;Karen Caeyenberghs;Sonya Foley;Derek Kenton Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter H. Wilson
Peter H. Wilson Australian Catholic University
Elisabeth A. Wilde
Elisabeth A. Wilde Baylor College of Medicine
Derek K. Jones
Derek K. Jones Cardiff University
Bert Steenbergen
Bert Steenbergen Radboud University
Guy Vingerhoets
Guy Vingerhoets Ghent University
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman North-West University
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Robert F. Asarnow
Robert F. Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers in mental health, psychology, counseling, and social work. If you’re considering alternative or complementary fields, there are several flexible online programs to help you reach your goals.

For those interested in social work, accelerated msw programs online offer a fast track to a Master of Social Work degree. These programs cater to students seeking a quick transition into professional roles supporting community well-being.

If psychology is your calling, a 2 year psychology degree online provides a condensed curriculum designed for early entry into psychological services and research roles.

A career in counseling is also in high demand. It's important to look for accredited options, such as cacrep-accredited online programs. These ensure rigorous training, meeting industry standards for professional licensure.

Additionally, there are a range of online mental health degree programs that provide affordable paths to becoming a mental health professional. Each of these options complements neuroscience pursuits and helps you launch a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Caeyenberghs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles