World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5781
World Ranking
9496
National Ranking
5034

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5845
World Ranking
8982
National Ranking
3800

Frank G. Hillary publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank G. Hillary sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank G. Hillary D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank G. Hillary sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank G. Hillary is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States and has published extensively in the field of medicine, focusing primarily on neurotrauma and brain injury research. Their body of work covers key areas including epidemiology, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, emergency medicine, and clinical psychology.

Their research topics encompass:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Brain Injury
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Frequent co-authors of Frank G. Hillary are:

  • Elisabeth A. Wilde
  • Emily L. Dennis
  • Amanda R. Rabinowitz
  • David F. Tate
  • Carrie Esopenko

Selected recent publications include:

  • "A global collaboration to study intimate partner violence-related head trauma: The ENIGMA consortium IPV working group," 2021, Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • "Race and ethnicity considerations in traumatic brain injury research: Incidence, reporting, and outcome," 2020, Brain Injury
  • "ENIGMA brain injury: Framework, challenges, and opportunities," 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • "Toward a global and reproducible science for brain imaging in neurotrauma: the ENIGMA adult moderate/severe traumatic brain injury working group," 2020, Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • "Feeding the machine: Challenges to reproducible predictive modeling in resting-state connectomics," 2021, Network Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries

    Paul M Thompson;Neda Jahanshad;Christopher R K Ching;Lauren E Salminen

  • ENIGMA and Global Neuroscience: A Decade of Large-Scale Studies of the Brain in Health and Disease Across More Than 40 Countries

    Paul Thompson

  • Neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis using functional MRI.

    John DeLuca;Helen M. Genova;Frank G. Hillary;Glenn Wylie

  • Injured Brains and Adaptive Networks: The Benefits and Costs of Hyperconnectivity

    Frank G. Hillary;Frank G. Hillary;Jordan H. Grafman

  • Resting Network Plasticity Following Brain Injury

    Toru Nakamura;Frank G. Hillary;Bharat B. Biswal

  • Hyperconnectivity is a fundamental response to neurological disruption

    Frank G. Hillary;Cristina A. Roman;Umesh Venkatesan;Sarah M. Rajtmajer

  • Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world.

    Michael N. Hallquist;Frank G. Hillary;Frank G. Hillary

  • The neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in traumatic brain injury using functional MRI

    A. D. Kohl;Glenn R. Wylie;H. M. Genova;F. G. Hillary

  • Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter Molenaar;Frank Gerard Hillary;Nilam Ram

  • The Rich Get Richer: Brain Injury Elicits Hyperconnectivity in Core Subnetworks

    Frank G. Hillary;Sarah M. Rajtmajer;Cristina A. Roman;John D. Medaglia

  • Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data.

    Kathleen M. Gates;Peter C.M. Molenaar;Frank G. Hillary;Semyon Slobounov

  • Changes in resting connectivity during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury

    F.G. Hillary;F.G. Hillary;J. Slocomb;E.C. Hills;N.M. Fitzpatrick

  • Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease

    Frank Gerard Hillary;Helen M. Genova;Helen M. Genova;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Bart Rypma

  • Cerebral activation patterns during working memory performance in multiple sclerosis using FMRI.

    Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Frank G. Hillary;Joseph H. Ricker;Christopher Christodoulou

  • The relationship between neuropsychological measures and the Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living task in multiple sclerosis.

    Yael Goverover;Helen M. Genova;Frank G. Hillary;John DeLuca

  • An investigation of working memory rehearsal in multiple sclerosis using fMRI.

    F. G. Hillary;N. D. Chiaravalloti;N. D. Chiaravalloti;J. H. Ricker;J. Steffener

  • Neuroimaging of working memory dysfunction and the dilemma with brain reorganization hypotheses.

    Frank G. Hillary

  • Examination of processing speed deficits in multiple sclerosis using functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Helen M. Genova;Helen M. Genova;Frank G. Hillary;Glenn Wylie;Bart Rypma

  • Epidemiological shifts in elderly traumatic brain injury: 18-year trends in Pennsylvania

    Deepa M. Ramanathan;Nathan McWilliams;Philip Schatz;Frank G. Hillary

  • Medial prefrontal cortex hyperactivation during social exclusion in borderline personality disorder.

    Anthony C. Ruocco;John D. Medaglia;Jennifer R. Tinker;Hasan Ayaz

  • Functionally activated brain imaging (O-15 PET and fMRI) in the study of learning and memory after traumatic brain injury.

    Joseph H. Ricker;Frank G. Hillary;John DeLuca;John DeLuca

Frequent Co-Authors

John DeLuca
John DeLuca Kessler Foundation
Helen M. Genova
Helen M. Genova Kessler Foundation
Philip Schatz
Philip Schatz Saint Joseph's University
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation
Glenn R. Wylie
Glenn R. Wylie Kessler Foundation
Elisabeth A. Wilde
Elisabeth A. Wilde Baylor College of Medicine
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University
Karen Caeyenberghs
Karen Caeyenberghs Deakin University
Erin D. Bigler
Erin D. Bigler University of Utah
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience graduates have a wide range of online educational options that can enhance their careers or open new opportunities in related fields. Those interested in specialized, well-paying roles may want to explore online certificate programs that pay well, which often offer a quick route to in-demand skills and credentials.

For learners seeking flexibility, a variety of online courses and degrees can be completed at your own pace, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments. This format is ideal for both working professionals and those looking to switch fields.

If you're interested in applying neuroscience in social work or behavioral settings, msw online programs and online bcba programs offer accessible pathways into careers like mental health counseling, therapy, and behavior analysis. These programs often have a significant impact on communities and can lead to licensure in high-demand fields.

Whichever direction you choose, online learning provides flexible, affordable, and career-focused options for those interested in neuroscience and its related professions.

Best Scientists Citing Frank G. Hillary

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles