World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
26833
World Ranking
1836
National Ranking
104

Philip C. Woodland publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Woodland sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 304 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Philip C. Woodland D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Woodland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2013 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to large vocabulary speech recognition

Overview

Philip C. Woodland is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily centers around computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and signal processing. Other subfields include computer vision and pattern recognition, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research covers several topics related to speech and audio technologies, natural language processing, and dialogue systems. Key areas of work include:

  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Philip C. Woodland has contributed significantly to scientific literature with numerous publications. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Adapting GPT, GPT-2 and BERT Language Models for Speech Recognition" (2021), published at the 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
  • "Tree-Constrained Pointer Generator for End-to-End Contextual Speech Recognition" (2021), presented at the 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
  • "Combination of deep speaker embeddings for diarisation" (2021), published in Neural Networks
  • "Knowledge Distillation for Neural Transducers from Large Self-Supervised Pre-Trained Models" (2022), presented at ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
  • "Tandem Multitask Training of Speaker Diarisation and Speech Recognition for Meeting Transcription" (2022), presented at Interspeech 2022

The most frequent co-authors in Woodland's body of work include:

  • Chao Zhang
  • Guangzhi Sun
  • Qiujia Li
  • Keqi Deng

The researcher has published often in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, the ASRU workshop, ICASSP, and Interspeech conferences.

In 2013, Philip C. Woodland was named an IEEE Fellow for contributions to large vocabulary speech recognition.

Best Publications

  • The HTK book

    SJ Young;J Jansen;JJ Odell;DG Ollason

  • Maximum likelihood linear regression for speaker adaptation of continuous density hidden Markov models

    C. J. Leggetter;Philip C. Woodland

  • Tree-Based State Tying for High Accuracy Modelling

    Steve J. Young;J. J. Odell;Philip C. Woodland

  • Tree-based state tying for high accuracy acoustic modelling

    S. J. Young;J. J. Odell;P. C. Woodland

  • The HTK book version 3.4

    SJ Young;G Evermann;Mjf Gales;D Kershaw

  • Minimum Phone Error and I-smoothing for improved discriminative training

    D. Povey;P.C. Woodland

  • Mean and variance adaptation within the MLLR framework

    Mark J. F. Gales;Philip C. Woodland

  • Large scale discriminative training of hidden Markov models for speech recognition

    P.C. Woodland;D. Povey

  • Large vocabulary continuous speech recognition using HTK

    P.C. Woodland;J.J. Odell;V. Valtchev;S.J. Young

  • MMIE training of large vocabulary recognition systems

    V. Valtchev;J. J. Odell;P. C. Woodland;S. J. Young

  • A variable-length category-based n-gram language model

    T.R. Niesler;P.C. Woodland

  • The 1994 HTK large vocabulary speech recognition system

    P.C. Woodland;C.J. Leggetter;J.J. Odell;V. Valtchev

  • A one pass decoder design for large vocabulary recognition

    J. J. Odell;V. Valtchev;P. C. Woodland;S. J. Young

  • A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. I. Ascending path

    Christian Giguère;Philip C. Woodland

  • State clustering in hidden Markov model-based continuous speech recognition

    Steve J. Young;Philip C. Woodland

  • Speaker adaptation of continuous density HMMs using multivariate linear regression

    C. J. Leggetter;Philip C. Woodland

  • The use of state tying in continuous speech recognition.

    Steve J. Young;Philip C. Woodland

  • Large vocabulary decoding and confidence estimation using word posterior probabilities

    G. Evermann;P.C. Woodland

  • Speaker adaptation of HMMs using linear regression

    CJ Leggetter;PC Woodland

  • The MGB challenge: Evaluating multi-genre broadcast media recognition

    P Bell;M J F Gales;T Hain;J Kilgour

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. F. Gales
Mark J. F. Gales University of Cambridge
Steve Young
Steve Young University of Cambridge
Thomas Hain
Thomas Hain University of Sheffield
Yanmin Qian
Yanmin Qian Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Daniel Povey
Daniel Povey Xiaomi (China)
Kai Yu
Kai Yu Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Karen Sparck Jones
Karen Sparck Jones University of Cambridge
William Byrne
William Byrne University of Cambridge
Steve Renals
Steve Renals University of Edinburgh
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for technology skills continues to rise, exploring related online degrees can open new avenues for Computer Science students. Programs like an online master data science blend advanced analytics with core computing techniques, paving the way for roles in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data.

For students looking to diversify their expertise, an online bachelor’s in construction management offers insight into project management, planning, and digital tools used in modern infrastructure. This can be a strong option for those interested in applying computing skills to the built environment.

If business leadership calls, pursuing an online MBA helps bridge the gap between technology and management. Many MBA programs now emphasize digital transformation and tech-driven strategy, making them ideal for CS graduates aiming for executive roles.

Time-sensitive learners can also consider 1 year online masters programs for rapid upskilling. These fast-tracked options allow professionals to quickly gain credentials and expand career prospects in a competitive market.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Woodland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles