World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
15038
World Ranking
4241
National Ranking
81

Lori Lamel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori Lamel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 301 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lori Lamel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori Lamel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2021 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to automatic speech recognition

Overview

Lori Lamel is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research spans multiple fields, particularly Psychology and Computer Science, with a significant focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. Their work also intersects Linguistics and Language as well as Language and Linguistics, with topics covering Pharmacy to a lesser extent.

The main topics Lori Lamel has contributed to include:

  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Speech and dialogue systems

Their recent publications span from 2020 to 2024 and include:

  • "TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus," 2024, Americanae (AECID Library)
  • "Investigating Transformer Encoders and Fusion Strategies for Speech Emotion Recognition in Emergency Call Center Conversations," 2022, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
  • "Mandarin lexical tone duration: Impact of speech style, word length, syllable position and prosodic position," 2022, Speech Communication
  • "Le schwa final en français standard est-il un " lubrifiant phonétique "?", 2020, SHS Web of Conferences
  • "When Phonetics Meets Morphology: Intervocalic Voicing Within and Across Words in Romance Languages," 2022, Interspeech 2022

Frequent venues of publication for Lori Lamel include:

  • SHS Web of Conferences
  • Interspeech 2022
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
  • Speech Communication

Lori Lamel collaborates regularly with a number of researchers, including:

  • Martine Adda-Decker
  • Ioana Vasilescu
  • Théo Deschamps-Berger
  • Laurence Devillers
  • Yaru Wu

In 2021, Lori Lamel was recognized as an IEEE Fellow for contributions to automatic speech recognition.

Best Publications

  • TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus

    John Garofolo;Lori Lamel;William Fisher;Jonathan Fiscus

  • DARPA TIMIT:: acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus CD-ROM, NIST speech disc 1-1.1

    John S Garofolo;Lori F Lamel;William M Fisher;Jonathan G Fiscus

  • Darpa Timit Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus CD-ROM {TIMIT} | NIST

    John S. Garofolo;L F. Lamel;W M. Fisher;Jonathan G. Fiscus

  • The LIMSI Broadcast News transcription system

    Jean-Luc Gauvain;Lori Lamel;Gilles Adda

  • An improved endpoint detector for isolated word recognition

    L. Lamel;L. Rabiner;A. Rosenberg;J. Wilpon

  • 2005 Special Issue: Challenges in real-life emotion annotation and machine learning based detection

    Laurence Devillers;Laurence Vidrascu;Lori Lamel

  • Lightly supervised and unsupervised acoustic model training

    Lori Lamel;Jean-Luc Gauvain;Gilles Adda

  • Partitioning and transcription of broadcast news data.

    Jean-Luc Gauvain;Lori Lamel;Gilles Adda

  • The LIMSI ARISE system

    L. Lamel;S. Rosset;J. L. Gauvain;S. Bennacef

  • EUROM-A Spoken Language Resource for the EU

    D Chan;A Fourcin;D Gibbon;B Granstrom

  • Language identification using phone-based acoustic likelihoods

    L.F. Lamel;J.L. Gauvain

  • EUROM - a spoken language resource for the EU - the SAM projects.

    Dominic S. F. Chan;Adrian Fourcin;Dafydd Gibbon;Björn Granström

  • High performance speaker-independent phone recognition using CDHMM.

    Lori Lamel;Jean-Luc Gauvain

  • Emotion detection in task-oriented spoken dialogues

    L. Devillers;L. Lamel;I. Vasilescu

  • Dialog in the RAILTEL telephone-based system

    S. Bennacef;L. Devillers;S. Rosset;L. Lamel

  • Speaker-independent continuous speech dictation

    J.-L. Gauvain;L. F. Lamel;G. Adda;M. Adda-Decker

  • Investigating syllabic structures and their variation in spontaneous french

    Martine Adda-Decker;Philippe Boula de Mareüil;Gilles Adda;Lori Lamel

  • On designing pronunciation lexicons for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition

    L. Lamel;G. Adda

  • Breaking the unwritten language barrier: the BULB project

    Gilles Adda;Sebastian Stüker;Martine Adda-Decker;Martine Adda-Decker;Odette Ambouroue

  • A spoken language system for information retrieval.

    Samir Bennacef;Hélène Bonneau-Maynard;Jean-Luc Gauvain;Lori Lamel

  • Score normalization and system combination for improved keyword spotting

    Damianos Karakos;Richard Schwartz;Stavros Tsakalidis;Le Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Luc Gauvain
Jean-Luc Gauvain Laboratoire d'Informatique pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur
Holger Schwenk
Holger Schwenk Facebook (United States)
Laurence Devillers
Laurence Devillers Sorbonne University
Lawrence R. Rabiner
Lawrence R. Rabiner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Aaron E. Rosenberg
Aaron E. Rosenberg AT&T (United States)
Richard Schwartz
Richard Schwartz Brown University
Jay G. Wilpon
Jay G. Wilpon Ai Wilpon Consulting LLC
John Makhoul
John Makhoul Raytheon (United States)
John S. Garofolo
John S. Garofolo National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career paths for computer science students in the USA. When choosing a program, it's crucial to look for online degree programs accredited by recognized accrediting bodies. Accreditation ensures your qualification is valued by employers and that the education meets high standards.

Online options are available in several fast-growing fields. For those interested in interactive entertainment, pursuing a game art degree online can lead to roles in game design and animation. If cybersecurity excites you, consider enrolling in an accelerated cyber security program to quickly gain skills in protecting digital assets.

There's also demand for tech-savvy professionals in leadership positions. A cheap online construction management degree blends technology and project management, preparing graduates for supervisory roles in the construction industry.

Each of these online degree paths supports flexible learning, making it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments, while advancing your career in a technology-driven world.

Best Scientists Citing Lori Lamel

Trending Scientists