World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
99
Citations
106384
World Ranking
378
National Ranking
207

Lawrence R. Rabiner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. Rabiner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 431 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lawrence R. Rabiner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. Rabiner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Jack S. Kilby Signal Processing Medal For far-reaching impact on the fields of digital signal processing and automatic speech recognition
  • 1990 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1983 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering Contributions to digital signal processing and speech communications research.
  • 1976 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to digital signal processing and speech communication research.

Overview

Lawrence R. Rabiner is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. The work of this scientist spans areas related to digital signal processing and speech communication research.

Recognized through several significant awards, Lawrence R. Rabiner received the Jack S. Kilby Signal Processing Medal in 1999 for impact on digital signal processing and automatic speech recognition. They were elected as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1990 and as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 1983 for contributions to these technical fields. Additionally, Lawrence R. Rabiner was named an IEEE Fellow in 1976 for work within digital signal processing and speech communication research.

Best Publications

  • A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition

    L.R. Rabiner

  • Fundamentals of speech recognition

    Lawrence Rabiner;Biing-Hwang Juang

  • An introduction to hidden Markov models

    L. Rabiner;B. Juang

  • Theory and application of digital signal processing

    L. R. Rabiner;B. Gold;C. K. Yuen

  • Digital Processing of Speech Signals

    Lawrence R. Rabiner;Ronald W. Schafer

  • A computer program for designing optimum FIR linear phase digital filters

    J. McClellan;T. Parks;L. Rabiner

  • An introduction to the application of the theory of probabilistic functions of a Markov process to automatic speech recognition

    S. E. Levinson;L. R. Rabiner;M. M. Sondhi

  • A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis and synthesis

    J.B. Allen;L.R. Rabiner

  • A comparative performance study of several pitch detection algorithms

    L. Rabiner;M. Cheng;A. Rosenberg;C. McGonegal

  • Multirate Digital Signal Processing

    Lawrence R. Rabiner

  • A digital signal processing approach to interpolation

    R.W. Schafer;L.R. Rabiner

  • Hidden Markov models for speech recognition

    B. H. Juang;L. R. Rabiner

  • An algorithm for determining the endpoints of isolated utterances

    L. R. Rabiner;M. R. Sambur

  • Interpolation and decimation of digital signals—A tutorial review

    R.E. Crochiere;L.R. Rabiner

  • Performance tradeoffs in dynamic time warping algorithms for isolated word recognition

    C. Myers;L. Rabiner;A. Rosenberg

  • The chirp z-transform algorithm

    L. Rabiner;R. Schafer;C. Rader

  • On the use of autocorrelation analysis for pitch detection

    L. Rabiner

  • Automatic recognition of keywords in unconstrained speech using hidden Markov models

    J.G. Wilpon;L.R. Rabiner;C.-H. Lee;E.R. Goldman

  • A vector quantization approach to speaker recognition

    F. Soong;A. Rosenberg;L. Rabiner;B. Juang

  • Combinatorial optimization:Algorithms and complexity

    L. Rabiner

  • Algorithm for determining the endpoints of isolated utterances

    L. R. Rabiner;M. R. Sambur

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron E. Rosenberg
Aaron E. Rosenberg AT&T (United States)
Jay G. Wilpon
Jay G. Wilpon Ai Wilpon Consulting LLC
Stephen E. Levinson
Stephen E. Levinson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Chin-Hui Lee
Chin-Hui Lee Georgia Institute of Technology
Biing-Hwang Juang
Biing-Hwang Juang Georgia Institute of Technology
Roberto Pieraccini
Roberto Pieraccini Google (United States)
Man Mohan Sondhi
Man Mohan Sondhi Alcatel Lucent (Germany)
James L. Flanagan
James L. Flanagan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ronald W. Schafer
Ronald W. Schafer Georgia Institute of Technology
Yariv Ephraim
Yariv Ephraim George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the growing demand for tech professionals, students studying Computer Science in the USA are exploring flexible ways to advance their education and careers. Affordable online degree options make it easier to build credentials without sacrificing work or personal commitments.

For those seeking a quick entry into the workforce, many consider beginning at community colleges near me. These programs offer foundational knowledge and can often be completed in as little as two years. Afterward, you might choose to transfer credits toward a bachelor's degree or head directly into a tech role.

If you're aiming for higher-level positions, it's worth exploring cheap masters programs in computer science or related fields. These online programs allow you to deepen your expertise, qualify for specialized roles, and enhance your earning potential.

Ambitious professionals looking to lead in education or business settings might pursue an ed d degree or even a doctorate organizational leadership. These advanced degrees can open doors to executive roles or positions in academia.

Whichever path you choose, online study offers accessible, affordable, and flexible options tailored to your career goals in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence R. Rabiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles