World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hisatomi Arima

Hisatomi Arima

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15493 14576 477 449 464 28981

Hisatomi Arima publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hisatomi Arima between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hisatomi Arima published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 21.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2019. 60 of the 592 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2019. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 47 publications 2025: 51 publications 2026: 9 publications
2000 2026

592 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hisatomi Arima: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 7
2007 4
2008 12
2009 11
2010 14
2011 18
2012 21
2013 22
2014 25
2015 31
2016 39
2017 40
2018 34
2019 52
2020 36
2021 45
2022 29
2023 29
2024 47
2025 51
2026 9
Total 592
Download as CSV

Hisatomi Arima publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hisatomi Arima sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 464 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 464
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hisatomi Arima D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hisatomi Arima sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hisatomi Arima is affiliated with Fukuoka University in Japan and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a total of 513 publications. Their research primarily centers on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, and neurology, alongside studies in public health, environmental and occupational health, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their main research topics cover a range of critical areas including blood pressure and hypertension studies, acute ischemic stroke management, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, nutritional studies and diet, sodium intake and health, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, and cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases.

Several notable papers published by Hisatomi Arima include:

  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes (2023, JAMA)
  • Dose-response, efficacy, and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 9): a 52-week, phase 2/3a, randomised, controlled trial (2020, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology)
  • Hypertension and related diseases in the era of COVID-19: a report from the Japanese Society of Hypertension Task Force on COVID-19 (2020, Hypertension Research)
  • Atrial fibrillation prevalence, awareness and management in a nationwide survey of adults in China (2021, Heart)
  • Sex Differences in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in China (2020, Circulation)

Hisatomi Arima frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, reflecting ongoing interdisciplinary research partnerships. These colleagues include Toshiki Maeda, Katsuyuki Miura, Craig S. Anderson, Kazuhiro Tada, and Atsushi Satoh.

The scientist's work is often published in several key academic venues, which accommodate their extensive research interests. These venues include:

  • Hypertension Research
  • Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Scientific Reports
  • Stroke

Best Publications

  • CPAP for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

    R. D. McEvoy;N. A. Antic;E. Heeley;Y. Luo

  • The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019)

    Satoshi Umemura;Hisatomi Arima;Shuji Arima;Kei Asayama

  • Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

    Fiona Turnbull;B Neal;T. Ninomiya

  • Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Subsequent Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease and Mortality

    Josef Coresh;Tanvir Chowdhury Turin;Kunihiro Matsushita;Yingying Sang

  • Follow-up of Blood-Pressure Lowering and Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

    Sophia Zoungas;John Chalmers;Bruce Neal;Laurent Billot

  • Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Johan Sundström;Johan Sundström;Hisatomi Arima;Mark Woodward;Mark Woodward;Rod Jackson

  • Trends in the Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rate of Cardiovascular Disease in a Japanese Community The Hisayama Study

    Michiaki Kubo;Yutaka Kiyohara;Isao Kato;Yumihiro Tanizaki

  • Incidence and risk factors for subtypes of cerebral infarction in a general population: the Hisayama study.

    Yumihiro Tanizaki;Yutaka Kiyohara;Isao Kato;Hiromitsu Iwamoto

  • Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Craig S. Anderson;Thompson Robinson;Richard I. Lindley;Hisatomi Arima

  • Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials.

    Sophia Zoungas;Sophia Zoungas;Hisatomi Arima;Hisatomi Arima;Hertzel C Gerstein;Rury R Holman

  • Absolute risk and predictors of the growth of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Joseph Frantzias;Robert J Lee;Patrick D Lyden

  • Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial.

    Hisatomi Arima;John Chalmers;Mark Woodward;Craig Anderson

  • Impact of visit-to-visit glycemic variability on the risks of macrovascular and microvascular events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE trial

    Yoichiro Hirakawa;Hisatomi Arima;Sophia Zoungas;Sophia Zoungas;Toshiharu Ninomiya

  • Change in albuminuria and subsequent risk of end-stage kidney disease: an individual participant-level consortium meta-analysis of observational studies

    Josef Coresh;Hiddo J L Heerspink;Yingying Sang;Kunihiro Matsushita

  • Adult height and the risk of cause-specific death and vascular morbidity in 1 million people: individual participant meta-analysis

    David Wormser;Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Stephen Kaptoge;Angela M. Wood

  • Effects of Blood Pressure Reduction in Mild Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Johan Sundström;Hisatomi Arima;Rod Jackson;Fiona Turnbull

  • LDL cholesterol and the development of stroke subtypes and coronary heart disease in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study.

    Tsuyoshi Imamura;Yasufumi Doi;Hisatomi Arima;Koji Yonemoto

  • Hematoma growth and outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage: The INTERACT1 study

    Candice Delcourt;Yining Huang;Hisatomi Arima;John Chalmers

  • Blood pressure variability and outcome after acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a post-hoc analysis of INTERACT2, a randomised controlled trial

    Lisa Manning;Yoichiro Hirakawa;Hisatomi Arima;Xia Wang

  • The effects of blood pressure reduction and of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events according to baseline blood pressure: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Sébastien Czernichow;Alberto Zanchetti;Fiona Turnbull;Federica Barzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig S. Anderson
Craig S. Anderson George Institute for Global Health
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Katsuyuki Miura
Katsuyuki Miura Shiga University of Medical Science
Hirotsugu Ueshima
Hirotsugu Ueshima Shiga University of Medical Science
Takayoshi Ohkubo
Takayoshi Ohkubo Teikyo University
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Yutaka Kiyohara
Yutaka Kiyohara Kyushu University
Stephen MacMahon
Stephen MacMahon University of Oxford
Mark W. Parsons
Mark W. Parsons University of New South Wales
Toshiharu Ninomiya
Toshiharu Ninomiya Kyushu University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA reveals a variety of alternative healthcare career and study options for students with diverse interests or circumstances. For those who prefer a more flexible pathway, many choose the easiest bsn program to get into, which can help prospective nurses enter the field faster and with fewer admission barriers.

Students interested in behind-the-scenes roles in healthcare might consider accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs enable you to build essential administrative skills and offer the convenience of both remote learning and potential financial assistance.

If testing is a concern, several institutions now offer nursing programs without teas requirements, removing the pressure of standardized entrance exams and making nursing more accessible.

Alternatively, for those seeking leadership roles in healthcare, an healthcare administration online degree can pave the way for management positions in hospitals or clinics. Overall, a wide range of online healthcare degrees and career pathways can support your ambitions in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Hisatomi Arima

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles