World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6208
World Ranking
7746
National Ranking
2758

Armin Kleinböhl publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin Kleinböhl sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Armin Kleinböhl D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin Kleinböhl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Armin Kleinböhl is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy, with a specific focus on subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Physiology, Atmospheric Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics addressed in their work include Planetary Science and Exploration, Astro and Planetary Science, Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life, Space Exploration and Technology, Spaceflight effects on biology, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Scientific Research and Discoveries.

They have contributed to various types of scholarly outputs, including journal articles published across notable venues, with a concentration on:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Icarus
  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Planetary and Space Science
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Martian water loss to space enhanced by regional dust storms" (2021) in Nature Astronomy
  • "Solar Tides in the Middle and Upper Atmosphere of Mars" (2020) in Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "A multiannual record of gravity wave activity in Mars's lower atmosphere from on-planet observations by the Mars Climate Sounder" (2020) in Icarus
  • "The Holy Grail: A road map for unlocking the climate record stored within Mars' polar layered deposits" (2020) in Planetary and Space Science
  • "Impact of Gravity Waves on the Middle Atmosphere of Mars: A Non-Orographic Gravity Wave Parameterization Based on Global Climate Modeling and MCS Observations" (2020) in Journal of Geophysical Research Planets

Kleinböhl often collaborates with a number of frequent co-authors, including:

  • D. M. Kass (23 publications)
  • Nicholas Heavens (8 publications)
  • S. Piqueux (7 publications)
  • J. T. Schofield (7 publications)
  • M. Slipski (6 publications)

Best Publications

  • The 2009 edition of the GEISA spectroscopic database

    N. Jacquinet-Husson;L. Crepeau;R. Armante;C. Boutammine

  • The detection of large HNO3-containing particles in the winter Arctic stratosphere.

    D. W. Fahey;R. S. Gao;K. S. Carslaw;J. Kettleborough

  • Mars Climate Sounder limb profile retrieval of atmospheric temperature, pressure, and dust and water ice opacity

    Armin Kleinböhl;John T. Schofield;David M. Kass;Wedad A. Abdou

  • Interannual similarity in the Martian atmosphere during the dust storm season

    D. M. Kass;A. Kleinböhl;D. J. McCleese;J. T. Schofield

  • Structure and dynamics of the Martian lower and middle atmosphere as observed by the Mars Climate Sounder: Seasonal variations in zonal mean temperature, dust and water ice aerosols

    D. J. McCleese;N. G. Heavens;J. T. Schofield;W. A. Abdou

  • Martian Year 34 Column Dust Climatology from Mars Climate Sounder Observations: Reconstructed Maps and Model Simulations

    Luca Montabone;Luca Montabone;Aymeric Spiga;Aymeric Spiga;David M. Kass;Armin Kleinböhl

  • The vertical distribution of dust in the Martian atmosphere during northern spring and summer: Observations by the Mars Climate Sounder and analysis of zonal average vertical dust profiles

    N. G. Heavens;N. G. Heavens;M. I. Richardson;A. Kleinböhl;D. M. Kass

  • Hydrogen escape from Mars enhanced by deep convection in dust storms

    Nicholas G. Heavens;Armin Kleinböhl;Michael S. Chaffin;Jasper S. Halekas

  • Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

    E. Dupuy;K.A. Walker;K.A. Walker;J. Kar;C.D. Boone

  • A single-scattering approximation for infrared radiative transfer in limb geometry in the Martian atmosphere

    Armin Kleinböhl;John T. Schofield;Wedad A. Abdou;Patrick G.J. Irwin

  • Chemical depletion of Arctic ozone in winter 1999/2000

    M. Rex;R. J. Salawitch;N. R. P. Harris;P. von der Gathen

  • The semidiurnal tide in the middle atmosphere of Mars

    Armin Kleinböhl;R. John Wilson;David Kass;John T. Schofield

  • Thermal Tides in the Martian Middle Atmosphere as Seen by the Mars Climate Sounder.

    C. Lee;W. G. Lawson;M. I. Richardson;N. G. Heavens

  • Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder ClO measurements

    M. L. Santee;A. Lambert;W. G. Read;N. J. Livesey

  • A vortex‐scale simulation of the growth and sedimentation of large nitric acid hydrate particles

    Kenneth S. Carslaw;Jamie A. Kettleborough;Megan J. Northway;Stewart Davies

  • Variability of the martian seasonal CO2 cap extent over eight Mars Years

    Sylvain Piqueux;Armin Kleinböhl;Paul O. Hayne;David M. Kass

  • Vertical distribution of dust in the Martian atmosphere during northern spring and summer: High-altitude tropical dust maximum at northern summer solstice

    N. G. Heavens;N. G. Heavens;M. I. Richardson;A. Kleinböhl;D. M. Kass

  • Carbon dioxide snow clouds on Mars: South polar winter observations by the Mars Climate Sounder

    Paul O. Hayne;Paul O. Hayne;David A. Paige;John T. Schofield;David M. Kass

  • Vertical distribution of dust and water ice aerosols from CRISM limb-geometry observations

    Michael Doyle Smith;Michael J. Wolff;Todd Clancy;Armin Kleinbohl

  • Mars Climate Sounder Observation of Mars' 2018 Global Dust Storm

    D. M. Kass;J. T. Schofield;A. Kleinböhl;D. J. McCleese

  • Mars' south polar hood as observed by the Mars Climate Sounder

    Jennifer L. Benson;David M. Kass;Armin Kleinböhl;Daniel J. McCleese

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Schofield
John T. Schofield California Institute of Technology
David M. Kass
David M. Kass California Institute of Technology
Paul O. Wennberg
Paul O. Wennberg California Institute of Technology
Mark I. Richardson
Mark I. Richardson California Institute of Technology
Aymeric Spiga
Aymeric Spiga Sorbonne University
G. C. Toon
G. C. Toon California Institute of Technology
Stephen R. Lewis
Stephen R. Lewis The Open University
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
Justus Notholt
Justus Notholt University of Bremen
John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students seek the easiest bachelor's degree options to streamline their education without compromising quality. This approach can make it more accessible to enter the environmental field through focused, manageable coursework.

Specialized online programs, such as a geologist degree online, are perfect for students aiming to understand Earth's processes and engage in fieldwork or research. These degrees provide a solid scientific foundation essential for environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation efforts.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which is vital for mapping and analyzing environmental data. Many top colleges with GIS programs offer flexible online options, enabling students to gain practical skills in spatial analysis and data visualization critical to modern environmental work.

For professionals seeking leadership roles or policy influence, combining technical knowledge with public administration is beneficial. Online easiest online MPA programs provide an efficient pathway to develop skills in management and governance, making graduates well-equipped to address environmental challenges through effective policy-making.

Best Scientists Citing Armin Kleinböhl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles