World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Müslüm Arıcı

Müslüm Arıcı

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Turkey
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 66 1471 1397 7 7 246 12018

Müslüm Arıcı publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Müslüm Arıcı between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Müslüm Arıcı published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 24.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 102 publications in 2023. 59 of the 409 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 102. Peak 102 publications in 2023. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 53 publications 2022: 63 publications 2023: 102 publications 2024: 64 publications 2025: 56 publications 2026: 3 publications
2010 2026

409 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Müslüm Arıcı: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 3
2016 3
2017 5
2018 9
2019 15
2020 27
2021 53
2022 63
2023 102
2024 64
2025 56
2026 3
Total 409
Download as CSV

Müslüm Arıcı publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Müslüm Arıcı sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 246 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260 246
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Müslüm Arıcı D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Müslüm Arıcı sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119 66
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Turkey Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Turkey Leader Award

Overview

Müslüm Arıcı is affiliated with Kocaeli University in Turkey and has a significant body of research in the fields of engineering and energy. Their academic work primarily focuses on mechanical engineering and renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental topics, with contributions also spanning building and construction, biomedical engineering, and environmental engineering.

Their research covers specific topics including solar thermal and photovoltaic systems, phase change materials research, building energy and comfort optimization, adsorption and cooling systems, nanofluid flow and heat transfer, heat transfer and optimization, and heat transfer mechanisms.

Arıcı's published works appear frequently in multiple scientific venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Energy Storage
  • Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
  • Energy
  • Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
  • Energy and Buildings

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, their leading co-authors include Dong Li, Çağatay Yıldız, Sandro Nižetić, Amin Shahsavar, and Mohamed Teggar.

Notable recent papers by Müslüm Arıcı include:

  • "Advances in thermal energy storage: Fundamentals and applications" (2023), published in Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  • "A state of art review and future viewpoint on advance cooling techniques for Lithium-ion battery system of electric vehicles" (2020), published in Journal of Energy Storage
  • "Biofuel production from microalgae: challenges and chances" (2022), published in Phytochemistry Reviews
  • "Thermal energy storage using phase change materials in building applications: A review of the recent development" (2023), published in Energy and Buildings
  • "Enhancement of PCM melting rate via internal fin and nanoparticles" (2020), published in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

The combination of their fields of study and main topics reveals a focus on energy storage, thermal management, and sustainable energy technologies. This multidisciplinary approach covers aspects of energy efficiency and optimization in both theoretical and applied contexts.

Best Publications

  • A state of art review and future viewpoint on advance cooling techniques for Lithium–ion battery system of electric vehicles

    Amrit Kumar Thakur;Rajendran Prabakaran;M. R. Elkadeem;Swellam W. Sharshir

  • Thermal Energy Storage Using Phase Change Materials in Building Applications: A Review of the Recent Development

    Unknown

  • Optical and thermal performance of glazing units containing PCM in buildings: A review

    Dong Li;Yangyang Wu;Baichao Wang;Changyu Liu

  • 3D validation, 2D feasibility, corrected and developed correlations for pure solid-gallium phase change modeling by enthalpy-porosity methodology

    Unknown

  • Redefined interface error, 2D verification and validation for pure solid-gallium phase change modeling by enthalpy-porosity methodology

    Unknown

  • A review on solar-powered cooling and air-conditioning systems for building applications

    Unknown

  • Melting of nanoparticle-enhanced paraffin wax in a rectangular enclosure with partially active walls

    Müslüm Arıcı;Ensar Tütüncü;Miraç Kan;Hasan Karabay

  • Flow and heat transfer in double, triple and quadruple pane windows

    Müslüm Arıcı;Hasan Karabay;Miraç Kan

  • Energy investigation of glazed windows containing Nano-PCM in different seasons

    Dong Li;Yangyang Wu;Changyu Liu;Guojun Zhang

  • Enhancement of PCM melting rate via internal fin and nanoparticles

    Müslüm Arıcı;Ensar Tütüncü;Çağatay Yıldız;Dong Li

  • Heat transfer enhancement of phase-change materials (PCMs) based thermal management systems for electronic components: A review of recent advances

    Unknown

  • Numerical investigation of natural convection behavior of molten PCM in an enclosure having rectangular and tree-like branching fins

    Çağatay Yıldız;Müslüm Arıcı;Sandro Nižetić;Amin Shahsavar

  • Phase change material based cooling of photovoltaic panel: A simplified numerical model for the optimization of the phase change material layer and general economic evaluation

    Müslüm Arıcı;Feyza Bilgin;Sandro Nižetić;Agis M. Papadopoulos

  • A novel and effective passive cooling strategy for photovoltaic panel

    Sandro Nižetić;Mišo Jurčević;Duje Čoko;Müslüm Arıcı

  • Photothermal properties and photothermal conversion performance of nano-enhanced paraffin as a phase change thermal energy storage material

    Ruitong Yang;Dong Li;Dong Li;Samanta López Salazar;Zhonghao Rao

  • New potential applications of phase change materials: A review

    Unknown

  • Thermal performance based optimization of an office wall containing PCM under intermittent cooling operation

    Ekrem Tunçbilek;Müslüm Arıcı;Michal Krajčík;Sandro Nižetić

  • Nano-enhanced phase change materials and fluids in energy applications: A review

    Sandro Nižetić;Mišo Jurčević;Müslüm Arıcı;A. Valan Arasu

  • Comparison of a theoretical and experimental thermal conductivity model on the heat transfer performance of Al2O3-SiO2/water hybrid-nanofluid

    Çağatay Yıldız;Müslüm Arıcı;Hasan Karabay

  • Influence of glazed roof containing phase change material on indoor thermal environment and energy consumption

    Dong Li;Yangyang Wu;Guojun Zhang;Müslüm Arıcı

  • Performance analysis of a modified solar still using reduced graphene oxide coated absorber plate with activated carbon pellet

    Amrit Kumar Thakur;Ravishankar Sathyamurthy;Swellam W. Sharshir;Abd Elnaby Kabeel;Abd Elnaby Kabeel

  • Investigation of pork fat as potential novel phase change material for passive cooling applications in photovoltaics

    Sandro Nižetić;Müslüm Arıcı;Feyza Bilgin;Filip Grubišić-Čabo

  • Thermal performance evaluation of glass window combining silica aerogels and phase change materials for cold climate of China

    Dong Li;Chengjun Zhang;Qing Li;Changyu Liu

  • A numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer inside a room for floor heating and wall heating systems

    Hasan Karabay;Müslüm Arıcı;Murat Sandık

  • Implementation of phase change materials for thermal regulation of photovoltaic thermal systems: Comprehensive analysis of design approaches

    Sandro Nižetić;Mišo Jurčević;Duje Čoko;Müslüm Arıcı

  • An investigation of flow and conjugate heat transfer in multiple pane windows with respect to gap width, emissivity and gas filling

    Müslüm Arıcı;Miraç Kan

Frequent Co-Authors

Amin Shahsavar
Amin Shahsavar Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Antonio Campo
Antonio Campo The University of Texas at San Antonio
Kamal Abdel Radi Ismail
Kamal Abdel Radi Ismail State University of Campinas
Seyed Soheil Mousavi Ajarostaghi
Seyed Soheil Mousavi Ajarostaghi Université de Sherbrooke
Zhenjun Ma
Zhenjun Ma University of Wollongong
Agis M. Papadopoulos
Agis M. Papadopoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Rahman Saidur
Rahman Saidur Sunway University
Masoud Afrand
Masoud Afrand Islamic Azad University of Najafabad
Mohsen Sharifpur
Mohsen Sharifpur University of the Witwatersrand
Swellam W. Sharshir
Swellam W. Sharshir Kafrelsheikh University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology remain at the forefront of innovation, but today’s career pathways extend far beyond traditional fields. Online education now offers flexible opportunities to gain specialized knowledge and skills tailored to the demands of modern industries.

For creative professionals, an online ux degree can lead to roles in user experience and interface design—crucial areas as digital products become increasingly sophisticated. Those interested in overseeing complex technical projects should consider a project manager degree, which develops leadership and organizational skills highly valued in engineering environments.

The financial technology sector is rapidly expanding, and pursuing crypto degrees can open doors to careers in blockchain and cryptocurrency. For those passionate about sports and technology, the sports degree online pathway combines management, analytics, and digital advancements.

These online degree options provide flexible, career-focused training and demonstrate the diverse educational choices available for today’s ambitious learners in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Müslüm Arıcı

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles