World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
5396
World Ranking
2815
National Ranking
976

Antonio Campo publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Campo sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 351 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Antonio Campo D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Campo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Campo is affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States. Their academic work and research contributions are associated with this institution.

As a researcher, Antonio Campo does not have listed recent papers or specific publication venues documented in the available data. There are no recorded frequent co-authors or collaborative research partnerships noted.

This scientist's areas of study, including main fields, subfields, and main topics of work, are not detailed in the current source data. There is also no information regarding book publications or awards received.

The available details focus primarily on their institutional affiliation, without further specifics about research output or thematic focuses. This profile represents the current extent of publicly accessible academic information for Antonio Campo.

Best Publications

  • Effect of nanofluid variable properties on natural convection in enclosures

    Eiyad Abu-Nada;Eiyad Abu-Nada;Ziyad N. Masoud;Hakan F. Öztop;Antonio Campo

  • A general review of the Wilson plot method and its modifications to determine convection coefficients in heat exchange devices

    José Fernández-Seara;Francisco J. Uhía;Jaime Sieres;Antonio Campo

  • Analytic solutions of the temperature distribution in Blasius viscous flow problems

    Shijun Liao;Antonio Campo

  • Laminar forced convection flow over a backward facing step using nanofluids

    A.A. Al-aswadi;H.A. Mohammed;N.H. Shuaib;Antonio Campo

  • Modeling thermal conductivity augmentation of nanofluids using diffusion neural networks

    Mohammad M. Papari;Fakhri Yousefi;Jalil Moghadasi;Hajir Karimi

  • Non-iterative estimation of heat transfer coefficients using artificial neural network models

    S.S. Sablani;A. Kacimov;J. Perret;A.S. Mujumdar

  • Modelling of pulverized coal boilers: review and validation of on-line simulation techniques

    Luis I. Díez;Cristóbal Cortés;Antonio Campo

  • Mixed convection in a double lid-driven cubic cavity

    Nasreddine Ouertatani;Nader Ben Cheikh;Brahim Ben Beya;Taieb Lili

  • Valuable reconsideration in the constructal design of cavities

    M.R. Hajmohammadi;S. Poozesh;A. Campo;S.S. Nourazar

  • Optimum plate separation in vertical parallelplate channels for natural convective flows: incorporation of large spaces at the channel extremes

    Biagio Morrone;Antonio Campo;Oronzio Manca

  • NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF PARTIALLY HEATED VERTICAL PARALLEL PLATES IN NATURAL CONVECTIVE COOLING

    Antonio Campo;Oronzio Manca;Biagio Morrone

  • Formation of a pitchfork bifurcation in thermal convection flow inside an isosceles triangular cavity

    El Hassan Ridouane;Antonio Campo

  • Heat transfer improvement due to the imposition of non-uniform wall heating for in-tube laminar forced convection

    M.R. Hajmohammadi;S. Poozesh;M. Rahmani;A. Campo

  • Improvement of Forced Convection Cooling Due to the Attachment of Heat Sources to a Conducting Thick Plate

    Mohammad Reza Hajmohammadi;Antonio Campo;S. Salman Nourazar;Amir Masood Ostad

  • Detailed analysis for the cooling performance enhancement of a heat source under a thick plate

    M.R. Hajmohammadi;M.R. Salimpour;M. Saber;A. Campo

  • Effects of surface radiation on natural convection in a rayleigh-benard square enclosure: steady and unsteady conditions

    El Hassan Ridouane;Mohammed Hasnaoui;Antonio Campo

  • Optimal discrete distribution of heat flux elements for in-tube laminar forced convection

    M.R. Hajmohammadi;S.S. Nourazar;A. Campo;S. Poozesh

  • Numerical computation of buoyant airflows confined to attic spaces under opposing hot and cold wall conditions

    El Hassan Ridouane;Antonio Campo;Matthew McGarry

  • Optimal design of unequal heat flux elements for optimized heat transfer inside a rectangular duct

    M.R. Hajmohammadi;M. Rahmani;A. Campo;O. Joneydi Shariatzadeh

  • Analytical solution for two-phase flow between two rotating cylinders filled with power law liquid and a micro layer of gas †

    Mohammad Reza Hajmohammadi;S. Salman Nourazar;A. Campo

  • Effects of a Thick Plate on the Excess Temperature of Iso-Heat Flux Heat Sources Cooled by Laminar Forced Convection Flow: Conjugate Analysis

    M. R. Hajmohammadi;M. Moulod;O. Joneydi Shariatzadeh;A. Campo

Frequent Co-Authors

Müslüm Arıcı
Müslüm Arıcı University of Kocaeli
Oronzio Manca
Oronzio Manca University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
José Fernández-Seara
José Fernández-Seara Universidade de Vigo
Mohammad Reza Salimpour
Mohammad Reza Salimpour Isfahan University of Technology
Balaram Kundu
Balaram Kundu Jadavpur University
Hussein A. Mohammed
Hussein A. Mohammed Edith Cowan University
Eiyad Abu-Nada
Eiyad Abu-Nada Khalifa University
Cristina H. Amon
Cristina H. Amon University of Toronto
Shyam S. Sablani
Shyam S. Sablani Washington State University
Pedro Albertos
Pedro Albertos Universitat Politècnica de València

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering careers focus heavily on technical expertise, many students explore complementary fields to broaden their skillset. For example, those interested in helping others might consider degrees in counseling, with options ranging from some of the easiest degree in counseling programs available online. These can provide foundational knowledge in human behavior alongside engineering skills.

For professionals looking to specialize further, options like the fastest BCBA program offer accelerated paths to certification in behavior analysis. This can complement engineering problem-solving approaches with behavioral insights.

Speech and communication skills are also critical in engineering leadership roles. Understanding how hard is it to get into SLP grad school can guide those considering graduate degrees in Speech-Language Pathology, a field closely related to communication disorders that might intersect with technology development.

Additionally, comparing speech-language pathology graduate programs by state helps prospective students find accessible programs online that fit their lifestyle and career ambitions. This multidisciplinary approach can open unique career pathways beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Campo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles