World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
8974
World Ranking
3729
National Ranking
254

Jens-Uwe Grooß publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens-Uwe Grooß sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 237 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jens-Uwe Grooß D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens-Uwe Grooß sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens-Uwe Grooß is affiliated with Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Environmental Science. Their research predominantly covers Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, contributing extensively to our understanding of atmospheric processes and environmental dynamics.

The scientist's work includes a significant number of publications in the field of Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics. Other research topics include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, Climate variability and models, Climate change and permafrost, as well as Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics.

Jens-Uwe Grooß has authored multiple papers published in prominent scientific journals, demonstrating engagement with current topics in atmospheric and environmental sciences. Recent papers include:

  • "Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion," 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Global perturbation of stratospheric water and aerosol burden by Hunga eruption," 2022, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "The evolution and dynamics of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai sulfate aerosol plume in the stratosphere," 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "The stratospheric Brewer-Dobson circulation inferred from age of air in the ERA5 reanalysis," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Record-Breaking Increases in Arctic Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Caused by Exceptionally Large Ozone Depletion in 2020," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters

Their frequent coauthors include Rolf Müller, Felix Ploeger, Andreas Engel, G. Bernhard, and Vitali Fioletov, indicating collaborative work within a network of researchers active in atmospheric and environmental sciences.

Jens-Uwe Grooß regularly publishes in several key scientific venues, including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their research contributions address complex processes involving atmospheric ozone, aerosol chemistry, gas dynamics, and interactions between climate variability and polar ice dynamics. This body of work supports deeper insights into stratospheric phenomena and their impact on broader environmental systems.

Best Publications

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 1. Formulation of advection and mixing

    Daniel S. McKenna;Paul Konopka;Jens-Uwe Grooß;Gebhard Günther

  • ML-CIRRUS : The airborne experiment on natural cirrus and contrail cirrus with the high-altitude long-range research aircraft HALO

    Christiane Voigt;Ulrich Schumann;Andreas Minikin;Ahmed Abdelmonem

  • A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 2. Formulation of chemistry scheme and initialization

    Daniel S. McKenna;Jens-Uwe Grooß;Gebhard Günther;Paul Konopka

  • Technical note: A stratospheric climatology for O 3 , H 2 O, CH 4 , NO x , HCl and HF derived from HALOE measurements

    J.-U. Grooß;James M. Russell Iii

  • Chlorine activation and ozone depletion in the Arctic vortex: Observations by the Halogen Occultation Experiment on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite

    Rolf Müller;Paul J. Crutzen;Jens-Uwe Grooß;Christoph Brühl

  • Mixing and ozone loss in the 1999–2000 Arctic vortex: Simulations with the three-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS)

    Paul Konopka;Hildegard-Maria Steinhorst;Jens-Uwe Grooß;Gebhard Günther

  • Global perturbation of stratospheric water and aerosol burden by Hunga eruption

    Unknown

  • The origin of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical properties

    Anna E. Luebke;Armin Afchine;Anja Costa;Jens-Uwe Grooß

  • A Reevaluation of the Ozone Budget with HALOE UARS Data: No Evidence for the Ozone Deficit.

    P. J. Crutzen;J. U. Grooß;C. Brühl;R. Müller

  • Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion

    Ines Tritscher;Michael C. Pitts;Lamont R. Poole;Simon P. Alexander

  • Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS)

    R. Pommrich;R. Pommrich;R. Müller;J.-U. Grooß;P. Konopka

  • Horizontal water vapor transport in the lower stratosphere from subtropics to high latitudes during boreal summer

    F. Ploeger;G. Günther;P. Konopka;Stephan Andreas Fueglistaler

  • Annual cycle of ozone at and above the tropical tropopause: observations versus simulations with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS)

    P. Konopka;J.-U. Grooß;G. Günther;F. Ploeger

  • Impact of the vertical velocity scheme on modeling transport in the tropical tropopause layer

    F. Ploeger;P. Konopka;G. Günther;J.-U. Grooß

  • Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone

    B. Vogel;G. Günther;R. Müller;J.-U. Grooß

  • The community atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-4.0

    Rolf Sander;Andreas Baumgaertner;David Cabrera-Perez;Franziska Frank

  • Hydration and dehydration at the tropical tropopause

    C. Schiller;J.-U. Grooß;P. Konopka;F. Plöger

  • A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone

    F. Ploeger;C. Gottschling;S. Griessbach;J.-U. Grooß

  • Impact of different Asian source regions on the composition of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and of the extratropical lowermost stratosphere

    B. Vogel;G. Günther;R. Müller;J.-U. Grooß

  • Ozone loss and chlorine activation in the Arctic winters 1991-2003 derived with the tracer-tracer correlations

    S. Tilmes;R. Müller;J.-U. Grooß;J. M. Russell Iii

  • Simple measures of ozone depletion in the polar stratosphere

    Rolf Müller;Jens-Uwe Grooß;Carsten Lemmen;Carsten Lemmen;D. Heinze

  • The impact of mid-latitude intrusions into the polar vortex on ozone loss estimates

    J.-U. Grooß;R. Müller

  • Evaluation of CLaMS, KASIMA and ECHAM5/MESSy1 simulations in the lower stratosphere using observations of Odin/SMR and ILAS/ILAS-II

    F. Khosrawi;F. Khosrawi;R. Müller;M.H. Proffitt;R. Ruhnke

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Müller
Rolf Müller Forschungszentrum Jülich
Paul Konopka
Paul Konopka Forschungszentrum Jülich
Martin Riese
Martin Riese Forschungszentrum Jülich
Martina Krämer
Martina Krämer Forschungszentrum Jülich
Stephan Borrmann
Stephan Borrmann Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Hermann Oelhaf
Hermann Oelhaf Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Daniel S. McKenna
Daniel S. McKenna Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Michael C. Pitts
Michael C. Pitts Langley Research Center
Peter Hoor
Peter Hoor Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Andreas Zahn
Andreas Zahn Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads students to consider further education options that can enhance career prospects. For those interested in advanced teaching or leadership roles, online doctoral programs without dissertation present a flexible alternative to traditional PhD paths, allowing professionals to gain expertise without the extensive research component.

Many educators pursue growth by enrolling in eds to edd bridge programs online, which provide a streamlined path from a master’s degree to a doctorate. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules, making it easier to balance work and study commitments.

For those looking to specialize in social work within environmental contexts, an affordable dsw program offers advanced training that emphasizes practical skills and leadership. These degrees can open doors to impactful careers in community and environmental health sectors.

At the undergraduate level, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers a cost-effective way to build a broad academic foundation. This flexibility helps students tailor their studies to include environmental topics while exploring diverse disciplines suited to their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jens-Uwe Grooß

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles