World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Huub C. J. Hoefsloot

Huub C. J. Hoefsloot

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
11613
World Ranking
7160
National Ranking
141

Huub C. J. Hoefsloot publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huub C. J. Hoefsloot sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Huub C. J. Hoefsloot D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huub C. J. Hoefsloot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Huub C. J. Hoefsloot is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research encompasses biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a primary focus on metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies.

Their recent publications include:

  • Integrative Analysis of Proteome and Transcriptome Dynamics during Bacillus subtilis Spore Revival, 2020, mSphere
  • Human Blood Lipoprotein Predictions from 1 H NMR Spectra: Protocol, Model Performances, and Cage of Covariance, 2021, Analytical Chemistry
  • Exploring dynamic metabolomics data with multiway data analysis: a simulation study, 2022, BMC Bioinformatics
  • Analyzing postprandial metabolomics data using multiway models: a simulation study, 2024, BMC Bioinformatics
  • In plants distal regulatory sequences overlap with unmethylated rather than low-methylated regions, in contrast to mammals, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Age K. Smilde (8 publications)
  • Evrim Acar (6 publications)
  • Barbara M. Bakker (4 publications)
  • Morten Arendt Rasmussen (4 publications)
  • Elena Merino Tejero (3 publications)

Their frequent publication venues encompass:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 4 publications
  • BMC Bioinformatics with 2 publications
  • Research Square (Research Square) with 2 publications
  • mSphere with 1 publication
  • Analytical Chemistry with 1 publication

The main fields of study focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology supported by subfields including molecular biology, computational mathematics, analytical chemistry, plant science, and computational theory and mathematics.

Key subfields of study are:

  • Molecular Biology (12 publications)
  • Computational Mathematics (4 publications)
  • Analytical Chemistry (3 publications)
  • Plant Science (3 publications)
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics (2 publications)

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (14 publications)
  • Tensor decomposition and applications (8 publications)
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 publications)
  • Gene expression and cancer classification (4 publications)
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 publications)
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 publications)
  • Music and Audio Processing (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data

    Robert A van den Berg;Huub C J Hoefsloot;Johan A Westerhuis;Age K Smilde

  • Assessment of PLSDA cross validation

    Johan A. Westerhuis;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Suzanne Smit;Daniel J. Vis

  • ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data

    Age K. Smilde;Jeroen J. Jansen;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Robert-Jan A. N. Lamers

  • Reflections on univariate and multivariate analysis of metabolomics data

    Edoardo Saccenti;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Age K. Smilde;Johan A. Westerhuis

  • Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA

    Johan A. Westerhuis;Ewoud J. J. van Velzen;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Age K. Smilde

  • Poiseuille flow to measure the viscosity of particle model fluids

    J. A. Backer;C. P. Lowe;H. C. J. Hoefsloot;P. D. Iedema

  • ASCA: Analysis of multivariate data obtained from an experimental design

    Jeroen J. Jansen;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Jan van der Greef;Marieke E. Timmerman

  • Capturing Arabidopsis Root Architecture Dynamics with root-fit Reveals Diversity in Responses to Salinity

    Magdalena M. Julkowska;Huub C.J. Hoefsloot;Selena Mol;Richard Feron

  • Genetic Components of Root Architecture Remodeling in Response to Salt Stress.

    Magdalena Julkowska;Iko Tamar Koevoets;Selena Mol;Huub Cj Hoefsloot

  • Data-processing strategies for metabolomics studies

    M.M.W.B. Hendriks;F.A. van Eeuwijk;R.H. Jellema;J.A. Westerhuis

  • Assessing the statistical validity of proteomics based biomarkers.

    Suzanne Smit;Mariëlle J. van Breemen;Huub C.J. Hoefsloot;Age K. Smilde

  • Multilevel data analysis of a crossover designed human nutritional intervention study.

    Ewoud J J van Velzen;Johan A Westerhuis;John P M van Duynhoven;Ferdi A van Dorsten

  • A critical assessment of feature selection methods for biomarker discovery in clinical proteomics

    Christin Christin;Huub C.J. Hoefsloot;Huub C.J. Hoefsloot;Age K. Smilde;Age K. Smilde;Berend Hoekman

  • ANOVA–principal component analysis and ANOVA–simultaneous component analysis: a comparison

    Gooitzen Zwanenburg;Huub C.J. Hoefsloot;Johan A. Westerhuis;Jeroen J. Jansen

  • Dynamic metabolomic data analysis: a tutorial review

    A. K. Smilde;J. A. Westerhuis;H. C. J. Hoefsloot;S. Bijlsma

  • Selection of optimal sensor position in a tubular reactor using robust degree of observability criteria

    F.W.J. van den Berg;H.C.J. Hoefsloot;H.F.M. Boelens;A.K. Smilde

  • Modeling Molecular Weight and Degree of Branching Distribution of low density Polyethylene

    Piet D. Iedema;Michael Wulkow;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot

  • NO-SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITION IN DISSIPATIVE PARTICLE DYNAMICS

    S. M. Willemsen;H. C. J. Hoefsloot;P. D. Iedema

  • Optimized time alignment algorithm for LC-MS data: Correlation optimized warping using component detection algorithm-selected mass chromatograms

    Christin Christin;Age K. Smilde;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Frank Suits

  • Multilevel component analysis of time-resolved metabolic fingerprinting data

    J.J. Jansen;H.C.J. Hoefsloot;J. van der Greef;M.E. Timmerman

  • Analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data

    Jeroen J. Jansen;Huub C. J. Hoefsloot;Hans F. M. Boelens;Jan Van Der Greef

Frequent Co-Authors

Age K. Smilde
Age K. Smilde University of Amsterdam
Johan A. Westerhuis
Johan A. Westerhuis University of Amsterdam
Chris G. de Koster
Chris G. de Koster University of Amsterdam
Rainer Bischoff
Rainer Bischoff University of Groningen
Peter M. A. Sloot
Peter M. A. Sloot University of Amsterdam
Søren Balling Engelsen
Søren Balling Engelsen University of Copenhagen
Johannes M. F. G. Aerts
Johannes M. F. G. Aerts Leiden University
Stanley Brul
Stanley Brul University of Amsterdam
Bas Teusink
Bas Teusink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Klaas J. Hellingwerf
Klaas J. Hellingwerf University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA also opens doors to related fields of study and alternative career pathways. Many students benefit from foundational programs like an associate in office administration, which can build essential skills in project management, communication, and office technology.

For those interested in broadening their expertise, an online business administration degree offers a strong grounding in business principles, a useful complement to technical knowledge. Leadership is also crucial in technology-driven environments; advancing your credentials through one of the best organizational leadership master's programs can help you manage teams and drive innovation.

Operations roles are in high demand for tech-savvy graduates, particularly those with advanced business skills. The best online mba in operations management programs are designed for professionals seeking leadership positions in operations, logistics, and process improvement.

Combining technology studies with degrees in administration, leadership, or operations offers a versatile pathway to career success in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Huub C. J. Hoefsloot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles