World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
10716
World Ranking
5844
National Ranking
91

Peter M. A. Sloot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. A. Sloot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 540 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter M. A. Sloot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. A. Sloot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Best Publications

  • 2014 International Conference on Computational Science

    D. Abramson;M. Lees;V. Krzhizhanovskaya;J. Dongarra

  • Computational Science — ICCS 2003

    Peter M. A. Sloot;David Abramson;Alexander V. Bogdanov;Yuriy E. Gorbachev

  • Computational Science – ICCS 2007

    Yong Shi;Geert Dick van Albada;Jack Dongarra;Peter M. A. Sloot

  • Computational Science — ICCS 2002

    Peter M. A. Sloot;Alfons G. Hoekstra;C. J. Kenneth Tan;Jack J. Dongarra

  • The Relative Ineffectiveness of Criminal Network Disruption

    Paul A. C. Duijn;Victor Kashirin;Peter M. A. Sloot;Peter M. A. Sloot;Peter M. A. Sloot

  • Computational Science Iccs 2008

    Marian Bubak;Geert Dick van Albada;Jack Dongarra;Peter M. A. Sloot

  • Computational Science – ICCS 2005

    Vaidy S. Sunderam;Geert Dick van Albada;Peter M. A. Sloot;Jack J. Dongarra

  • eHealth in the future of medications management: personalisation, monitoring and adherence

    Josip Car;Josip Car;Woan Shin Tan;Woan Shin Tan;Zhilian Huang;Peter Sloot;Peter Sloot;Peter Sloot

  • Simulating Complex Systems by Cellular Automata

    Alfons G. Hoekstra;Jiri Kroc;Peter M.A. Sloot

  • Lattice-Boltzmann hydrodynamics on parallel systems

    D. Kandhai;A. Koponen;A.G. Hoekstra;M. Kataja

  • Advances in Grid Computing - EGC 2005

    Peter M. A. Sloot;Alfons G. Hoekstra;Thierry Priol;Alexander Reinefeld

  • The distributed ASCI Supercomputer project

    Henri Bal;Raoul Bhoedjang;Rutger Hofman;Ceriel Jacobs

  • A hybrid approach to extract protein–protein interactions

    Quoc-Chinh Bui;Sophia Katrenko;Peter M. A. Sloot

  • Review: The emergence of slums: A contemporary view on simulation models

    Debraj Roy;Michael Harold Lees;Bharath Palavalli;Karin Pfeffer

  • Advancing urban mental health research: from complexity science to actionable targets for intervention.

    Junus M van der Wal;Claudia D van Borkulo;Marie K Deserno;Marie K Deserno;Josefien J F Breedvelt

  • Antiretroviral therapy optimisation without genotype resistance testing: a perspective on treatment history based models

    Mattia C. F. Prosperi;Mattia C. F. Prosperi;Michal Rosen-Zvi;André Altmann;Maurizio Zazzi

  • Perspectives on grid computing

    Uwe Schwiegelshohn;Rosa M. Badia;Marian Bubak;Marco Danelutto

  • Implementation Aspects of 3D Lattice-BGK

    D Kandhai;A Koponen;A Hoekstra;M Kataja

  • Radiation forces in the discrete-dipole approximation

    Alfons G. Hoekstra;M. Frijlink;L. B. F. M. Waters;Peter M. A. Sloot

  • Multi-scale modelling in computational biomedicine

    Peter M.A. Sloot;Alfons G. Hoekstra

  • Modelling and simulation

    P.M.A. Sloot

  • Computational Science - ICCS 2007, 7th International Conference, Beijing, China, May 27 - 30, 2007, Proceedings, Part III

    Yong Shi;G Dick van Albada;Jack Dongarra;Peter M A Sloot

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Charles A. Boucher
Charles A. Boucher Erasmus University Rotterdam
Andrea De Luca
Andrea De Luca University of Siena
Yong Shi
Yong Shi Chinese Academy of Sciences
David A. M. C. van de Vijver
David A. M. C. van de Vijver Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carl G. Figdor
Carl G. Figdor Radboud University
Ilkay Altintas
Ilkay Altintas University of California, San Diego
Huub C. J. Hoefsloot
Huub C. J. Hoefsloot University of Amsterdam
Andrew Adamatzky
Andrew Adamatzky University of the West of England
David Dubbeldam
David Dubbeldam University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Many students are choosing flexible programs like the accelerated computer science degree to quickly gain in-demand skills and enter the workforce sooner.

If you're interested in broadening your expertise, consider fields closely related to computer science. For example, an understanding of technology can give you an edge in environmental fields. If you’re curious about potential jobs, see what can you do with an environmental science degree for insights into interdisciplinary roles.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Luckily, there are excellent options for online degrees in technical fields. Explore the cheapest online environmental science degree and learn how you can diversify your knowledge without breaking the bank. For those interested in engineering, check out the online mechanical engineering degree to see how computer science intersects with machinery and design.

With many flexible and affordable degree pathways available, you can tailor your education to match your goals and interests in the evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. A. Sloot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles