World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
16749
World Ranking
7040
National Ranking
181

Bas Teusink publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Teusink sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 239 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bas Teusink D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Teusink sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bas Teusink is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands and works primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research contributions total 151 publications focused on areas such as Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Food Science, Genetics, and Spectroscopy.

The scientist's work spans a range of topics including Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction, Fungal and yeast genetics research, Gene Regulatory Network Analysis, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Biofuel production and bioconversion, Probiotics and Fermented Foods, and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis.

Bas Teusink has published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), FEMS Microbiology Reviews, mSystems, and Nature Biotechnology.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing" (2020), Nature Biotechnology
  • "Metabolic cooperation and spatiotemporal niche partitioning in a kefir microbial community" (2021), Nature Microbiology
  • "Searching for principles of microbial physiology" (2020), FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • "Whole-cell modeling in yeast predicts compartment-specific proteome constraints that drive metabolic strategies" (2022), Nature Communications
  • "Quantitative analysis of amino acid metabolism in liver cancer links glutamate excretion to nucleotide synthesis" (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Bas Teusink frequently collaborates with several co-authors. These include Pranas Grigaitis, Frank J. Bruggeman, Johan H. van Heerden, Herwig Bachmann, and Sebastián N. Mendoza, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations

    Léonie M. Raamsdonk;Bas Teusink;David Broadhurst;Nianshu Zhang

  • Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry.

    Bas Teusink;Jutta Passarge;Corinne A. Reijenga;Eugenia Esgalhado

  • Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics

    Douwe Molenaar;Rogier van Berlo;Dick de Ridder;Bas Teusink

  • MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing

    Christian Lieven;Moritz Emanuel Beber;Brett G. Olivier;Frank T. Bergmann

  • Analysis of Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a Complex Medium Using a Genome-scale Metabolic Model

    Bas Teusink;Anne Wiersma;Douwe Molenaar;Christof Francke

  • Lost in Transition: Start-Up of Glycolysis Yields Subpopulations of Nongrowing Cells

    Johan H. van Heerden;Johan H. van Heerden;Johan H. van Heerden;Meike T. Wortel;Meike T. Wortel;Meike T. Wortel;Frank J. Bruggeman;Frank J. Bruggeman;Joseph J. Heijnen

  • The danger of metabolic pathways with turbo design

    B Teusink;M C Walsh;K van Dam;H V Westerhoff

  • Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift

    Ana Solopova;Jordi van Gestel;Franz J. Weissing;Herwig Bachmann

  • Reconstructing the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome

    Christof Francke;Roland J. Siezen;Bas Teusink

  • SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models

    Sarah M. Keating;Sarah M. Keating;Dagmar Waltemath;Matthias König;Fengkai Zhang

  • Community Flux Balance Analysis for Microbial Consortia at Balanced Growth

    Ruchir A. Khandelwal;Brett G. Olivier;Brett G. Olivier;Wilfred F. M. Röling;Wilfred F. M. Röling;Bas Teusink;Bas Teusink

  • How fast-growing bacteria robustly tune their ribosome concentration to approximate growth-rate maximization.

    Evert Bosdriesz;Douwe Molenaar;Bas Teusink;Frank J. Bruggeman

  • Acetaldehyde mediates the synchronization of sustained glycolytic oscillations in populations of yeast cells

    P. Richard;B.M. Bakker;B. Teusink;K. van Dam

  • Finding functional differences between species in a microbial community: Case studies in wine fermentation and Kefir culture

    Chrats Melkonian;Willi Gottstein;Sonja Blasche;Yongkyu Kim

  • Compartmentation protects trypanosomes from the dangerous design of glycolysis

    BM Bakker;Fic Mensonides;B Teusink;P van Hoek

  • CD36 deficiency increases insulin sensitivity in muscle, but induces insulin resistance in the liver in mice.

    Jeltje R. Goudriaan;Vivian E.H. Dahlmans;Bas Teusink;D. Margriet Ouwens

  • In Silico Reconstruction of the Metabolic Pathways of Lactobacillus plantarum: Comparing Predictions of Nutrient Requirements with Those from Growth Experiments

    Bas Teusink;Frank H. J. van Enckevort;Christof Francke;Anne Wiersma

  • Accelerating the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

    Richard A. Notebaart;Frank H. J. van Enckevort;Christof Francke;Roland J. Siezen

  • Availability of public goods shapes the evolution of competing metabolic strategies

    H. Bachmann;M. Fischlechner;I. Rabbers;N. Barfa

  • Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes

    Teusink B;Passarge J;Reijenga Ka;Esgalhado E

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans V. Westerhoff
Hans V. Westerhoff Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Douwe Molenaar
Douwe Molenaar Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Willem M. de Vos
Willem M. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Barbara M. Bakker
Barbara M. Bakker University Medical Center Groningen
Oscar P. Kuipers
Oscar P. Kuipers University of Groningen
Jens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen Chalmers University of Technology
Louis M. Havekes
Louis M. Havekes Leiden University Medical Center
Eddy J. Smid
Eddy J. Smid Wageningen University & Research
Jeroen Hugenholtz
Jeroen Hugenholtz University of Groningen
Jan Kok
Jan Kok University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology or Biochemistry can open up several rewarding career pathways, especially when paired with online education options. Many students consider advanced management roles in healthcare by enrolling in the cheapest online mba in healthcare management programs, which can offer leadership opportunities while being budget-friendly.

Another growing field is medical coding and billing. Understanding the differences between medical coding certification types—such as CPC and CCS—can help you choose the right credential based on your interests and career goals. If you’re considering this path, you might wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder: many programs offer training that can be completed in under a year.

With the healthcare sector expanding, there’s a positive job outlook for medical billing and coding professionals. These roles often allow for remote work, flexible hours, and solid salary prospects. Exploring related online degrees and certifications can be a smart move if you’re motivated to bridge your science background with practical career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Bas Teusink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles