World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
28874
World Ranking
12882
National Ranking
5482

Pedro Mendes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Mendes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 169 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Pedro Mendes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Mendes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro Mendes is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Periodontics, Information Systems and Management, Biophysics, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work encompasses diverse topics including Gene Regulatory Network Analysis, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Oral Microbiology and Periodontitis Research, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction, and Gut Microbiota and Health.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pedro Mendes include Sherli Koshy-Chenthittayil, Reinhard Laubenbacher, Stefan Hoops, Linda Archambault, and Anna Dongari-Bagtzoglou.

Their recent papers cover a range of subjects and venues:

  • Computational strategies to combat COVID-19: useful tools to accelerate SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus research, 2020, Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • BioSimulators: a central registry of simulation engines and services for recommending specific tools, 2022, CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
  • Agent Based Models of Polymicrobial Biofilms and the Microbiome-A Review, 2021, Microorganisms
  • Computational Strategies to Combat COVID-19: Useful Tools to Accelerate SARS-CoV-2 and Coronavirus Research, 2020, Preprints.org
  • MYC dosage compensation is mediated by miRNA-transcription factor interactions in aneuploid cancer, 2021, iScience

Pedro Mendes has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), mSphere, arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Briefings in Bioinformatics.

Best Publications

  • The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models.

    M. Hucka;A. Finney;H. M. Sauro;H. Bolouri;H. Bolouri

  • COPASI---a COmplex PAthway SImulator

    Stefan Hoops;Sven Sahle;Ralph Gauges;Christine Lee

  • Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era

    Lloyd W Sumner;Pedro Mendes;Richard A Dixon

  • A community-driven global reconstruction of human metabolism

    Ines Thiele;Neil Swainston;Ronan M T Fleming;Andreas Hoppe

  • Parameter Estimation in Biochemical Pathways: A Comparison of Global Optimization Methods

    Carmen G. Moles;Pedro Mendes;Julio R. Banga

  • ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites.

    Janna Hastings;Gareth Owen;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool

    Raoul J. Bino;Robert D. Hall;Oliver Fiehn;Joachim Kopka

  • GEPASI: A software package for modelling the dynamics, steady states and control of biochemical and other systems

    Pedro Mendes

  • Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation.

    Pedro Mendes;Douglas B. Kell

  • Biochemistry by numbers: simulation of biochemical pathways with Gepasi 3

    Pedro Mendes

  • Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM)

    Nicolas Le Novère;Andrew Finney;Michael Hucka;Upinder S. Bhalla

  • A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology

    Markus Herrgard;Neil Swainston;Paul Dobson;Warwick B. Dunn

  • Discovery of meaningful associations in genomic data using partial correlation coefficients

    Alberto De La Fuente;Nan Bing;Ina Hoeschele;Pedro Mendes

  • The metabolomics standards initiative (MSI)

    Oliver Fiehn;Don Robertson;Jules Griffin;Mariet vab der Werf

  • myo-inositol oxygenase offers a possible entry point into plant ascorbate biosynthesis.

    Argelia Lorence;Boris I. Chevone;Pedro Mendes;Craig L. Nessler

  • Metabolic profiling of Medicago truncatula cell cultures reveals the effects of biotic and abiotic elicitors on metabolism

    Corey D. Broeckling;David V. Huhman;Mohamed A. Farag;Joel T. Smith

  • The Metabolomics Standards Initiative

    Susanna Assunta Sansone;Teresa Fan;Royston Goodacre;Julian L. Griffin

  • A hybrid approach for efficient and robust parameter estimation in biochemical pathways.

    Maria Rodriguez-Fernandez;Pedro Mendes;Julio R. Banga

  • Gene networks: how to put the function in genomics

    Paul Brazhnik;Alberto de la Fuente;Pedro Mendes

  • Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology

    Mélanie Courtot;Nick Juty;Christian Knüpfer;Dagmar Waltemath

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas B. Kell
Douglas B. Kell University of Liverpool
Neil Swainston
Neil Swainston Epoch BioDesign
Hans V. Westerhoff
Hans V. Westerhoff Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Reinhard Laubenbacher
Reinhard Laubenbacher University of Florida
Michael Hucka
Michael Hucka California Institute of Technology
Warwick B. Dunn
Warwick B. Dunn University of Liverpool
Nicolas Le Novère
Nicolas Le Novère Babraham Institute
Lloyd W. Sumner
Lloyd W. Sumner University of Missouri
Stephen G. Oliver
Stephen G. Oliver University of Cambridge
Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Julio Saez-Rodriguez Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Pedro Mendes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles