World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip L. Jackson

Philip L. Jackson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7070 6593 479 450 136 19654

Philip L. Jackson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip L. Jackson between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip L. Jackson published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 15 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
2001 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip L. Jackson: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 1
2006 5
2007 2
2008 0
2009 0
2010 4
2011 12
2012 10
2013 16
2014 7
2015 15
2016 22
2017 13
2018 10
2019 16
2020 9
2021 10
2022 4
2023 9
2024 7
2025 8
Total 190
Download as CSV

Philip L. Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip L. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 136
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip L. Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip L. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip L. Jackson is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada. Their research spans several areas within psychology and medicine, focusing notably on cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry, mental health, and clinical psychology.

Their research covers various topics including:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Philip L. Jackson's recent papers demonstrate a diverse interest in interdisciplinary and psychological topics. Key publications include:

  • Diverse perspectives on interdisciplinarity from Members of the College of the Royal Society of Canada, 2020, FACETS
  • A methodology to improve eye contact in telepsychotherapy via videoconferencing with considerations for psychological distance, 2020, Counselling Psychology Quarterly
  • Emotion regulation of others' positive and negative emotions is related to distinct patterns of heart rate variability and situational empathy, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Reappraisal and empathic perspective-taking - More alike than meets the eyes, 2022, NeuroImage
  • Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research, 2021, Journal of Pain Research

Frequent publication venues associated with their work include:

  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Scientific Reports
  • Psychological Reports
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • FACETS

Regular collaborators in their research include:

  • Marie-Hélène Tessier
  • Audrey Marcoux
  • Frédéric Grondin
  • M. Tremblay
  • Geneviève Belleville

Philip L. Jackson has also contributed to academic literature through books published by Presses de l'Université Laval, with titles set for 2025:

  • Make'em Write!
  • Extraire une thèse d'un cerveau étudiant sans gâchis

Best Publications

  • The functional architecture of human empathy

    Jean Decety;Philip L. Jackson

  • How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy.

    Philip L. Jackson;Andrew N. Meltzoff;Jean Decety

  • A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy

    Jean Decety;Philip L. Jackson

  • Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain

    Philip L. Jackson;Eric Brunet;Andrew N. Meltzoff;Jean Decety

  • The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis.

    Sébastien Hétu;Mathieu Grégoire;Arnaud Saimpont;Michel-Pierre Coll

  • Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation.

    Philip L. Jackson;Martin F. Lafleur;Francine Malouin;Carol Richards

  • The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation

    Jean Decety;Philip L. Jackson;Jessica A. Sommerville;Thierry Chaminade

  • A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication

    Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Kenneth D. Craig;Steve Duck;Annmarie Cano

  • The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study.

    Francine Malouin;Carol L. Richards;Philip L. Jackson;Martin F. Lafleur

  • Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor‐related tasks: A PET study

    Francine Malouin;Carol L. Richards;Philip L. Jackson;Francine Dumas

  • Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking.

    Philip L. Jackson;Andrew N. Meltzoff;Jean Decety

  • To what extent do we share the pain of others? Insight from the neural bases of pain empathy.

    Philip L. Jackson;Pierre Rainville;Jean Decety

  • Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery.

    Philip L Jackson;Martin F Lafleur;Francine Malouin;Carol L Richards

  • Motor Learning Produces Parallel Dynamic Functional Changes during the Execution and Imagination of Sequential Foot Movements

    Martin F. Lafleur;Philip L. Jackson;Francine Malouin;Carol L. Richards

  • Motor cognition: a new paradigm to study self-other interactions

    Philip L Jackson;Jean Decety

  • Somatic and vicarious pain are represented by dissociable multivariate brain patterns.

    Anjali Krishnan;Anjali Krishnan;Choong-Wan Woo;Luke J Chang;Luke J Chang;Luka Ruzic;Luka Ruzic

  • Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review

    Francine Malouin;Philip L. Jackson;Carol L. Richards

  • The Efficacy of Combined Physical and Mental Practice in the Learning of a Foot-Sequence Task after Stroke: A Case Report:

    Philip L. Jackson;Julien Doyon;Carol L. Richards;Francine Malouin

  • Social cognition in first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    Marie-Audrey Lavoie;India Plana;Jacinthe Bédard Lacroix;Florence Godmaire-Duhaime

  • Assessment of empathy in first-episode psychosis and meta-analytic comparison with previous studies in schizophrenia.

    Amelie M. Achim;Rosalie Ouellet;Marc-André Roy;Philip L. Jackson

  • Topical review To what extent do we share the pain of others? Insight from the neural bases of pain empathy

    Philip L. Jackson;Pierre Rainville;Jean Decety

Frequent Co-Authors

Dimitrios Hariskos
Dimitrios Hariskos University of Stuttgart
Michael Powalla
Michael Powalla Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Pierre Rainville
Pierre Rainville University of Montreal
Sébastien Tremblay
Sébastien Tremblay Université Laval
Aymeric Guillot
Aymeric Guillot Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Laurent J. Bouyer
Laurent J. Bouyer Université Laval
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Andrew N. Meltzoff University of Washington
Kenneth M. Prkachin
Kenneth M. Prkachin University of Northern British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students who study psychology in the USA are interested in related online degrees, especially in fields like social work. These programs offer flexible learning options and often lead to meaningful, in-demand careers. Choosing an online degree with strong job prospects and a good return on investment is important for future professionals.

If you are considering a career in social work, it’s worth exploring programs that offer the best value. For example, you can find details on the best value online social work degrees in Kansas and compare options in other regions. Interested in the east coast? Check out the most valuable online social work degree programs in Maryland.

Students in the central US should review the best value online social work programs in the Midwest for more tailored options. Those looking to study in the west can explore the best value online social work programs in Nevada.

Exploring these pathways can help you make informed decisions about your education and career, ensuring your psychological studies lead to rewarding opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Philip L. Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles