World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8464
World Ranking
5784
National Ranking
5

John A. Stanturf publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Stanturf sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John A. Stanturf D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Stanturf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Stanturf is affiliated with the Estonian University of Life Sciences in Estonia. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with significant contributions to agricultural and biological sciences. Stanturf's work spans several subfields, including global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, insect science, soil science, and atmospheric science.

The main topics covered in their publications include forest management and policy, forest ecology and management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stanturf include Kalev Jõgiste, Marek Metslaid, Andres Kiviste, Lee E. Frelich, and Ahto Kangur.

Stanturf has published in several recurrent academic venues such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forests, Restoration Ecology, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, and the Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by John A. Stanturf include:

  • Forest landscape restoration: state of play, 2020, Royal Society Open Science
  • Forest landscape restoration: building on the past for future success, 2021, Restoration Ecology

Additional highly cited papers relevant to their field of study authored by others but related to similar thematic concerns are:

  • Tamm Review: Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: A knowledge synthesis, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Forest Landscape Restoration-What Generates Failure and Success?, 2020, Forests
  • Scaling up forest landscape restoration in Canada in an era of cumulative effects and climate change, 2020, Forest Policy and Economics

Best Publications

  • Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate

    Yongqiang Liu;John Stanturf;Scott Goodrick

  • Tamm Review: Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: A knowledge synthesis

    Mathias Mayer;Cindy E. Prescott;Wafa E.A. Abaker;Laurent Augusto

  • Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function

    John A. Stanturf;Brian J. Palik;R. Kasten Dumroese

  • Achieving Restoration Success: Myths in Bottomland Hardwood Forests

    John A. Stanturf;Stephen H. Schoenholtz;Callie Jo Schweitzer;James P. Shepard

  • Future U.S. wildfire potential trends projected using a dynamically downscaled climate change scenario

    Yongqiang Liu;Scott L. Goodrick;John A. Stanturf

  • Disturbance and coastal forests: a strategic approach to forest management in hurricane impact zones

    John A. Stanturf;Scott L. Goodrick;Kenneth W. Outcalt

  • Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests

    John A Stanturf;Palle Madsen

  • Leaf Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Dynamics in Four Southern Forested Floodplain Communities

    Terrell T. Baker;B. Graeme Lockaby;William H. Conner;Calvin E. Meier

  • Restoring bottomland hardwood ecosystems in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

    John A. Stanturf;Emile S. Gardiner;Paul B. Hamel;Margaret S. Devall

  • Forest Restoration Paradigms

    John Stanturf;Brian J. Palik;Mary I. Williams;R. Kasten Dumroese

  • Post-hurricane forest damage assessment using satellite remote sensing

    Wanting Wang;John J. Qu;Xianjun Hao;Yongqiang Liu

  • Forest landscape restoration - What generates failure and success?

    Markus Höhl;Vianny Ahimbisibwe;John A. Stanturf;Peter Elsasser

  • Implementing forest landscape restoration under the Bonn Challenge: a systematic approach

    John A. Stanturf;Michael Kleine;Stephanie Mansourian;John Parrotta

  • Considerations for restoring temperate forests of tomorrow: forest restoration, assisted migration, and bioengineering

    R. Kasten Dumroese;Mary I. Williams;John A. Stanturf;J. Bradley St. Clair

  • Afforestation of Marginal Agricultural Land in the Lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley, U.S.A.

    John A. Stanturf;Callie J. Schweitzer;Emile S. Gardiner

  • Silvicultural systems for southern bottomland hardwood forests.

    James S. Meadows;John A. Stanturf

  • Forest landscape restoration: state of play.

    John A. Stanturf;Stephanie Mansourian

  • Forest landscape restoration: increasing the positive impacts of forest restoration or simply the area under tree cover?

    Stephanie Mansourian;John A. Stanturf;Mercy Afua Adutwumwaa Derkyi;Vera Lex Engel

  • Analysis of forest naturalness and tree mortality patterns in Estonia

    Diana Laarmann;Henn Korjus;Allan Sims;John A. Stanturf

  • Hemiboreal forest: natural disturbances and the importance of ecosystem legacies to management.

    Kalev Jõgiste;Kalev Jõgiste;Henn Korjus;John A. Stanturf;Lee E. Frelich

  • Fine Root Productivity and Dynamics on a Forested Floodplain in South Carolina

    Terrell T. Baker;William H. Conner;B.Graeme Lockaby;John A. Stanturf

  • Recognizing and Overcoming Difficult Site Conditions for Afforestation of Bottomland Hardwoods

    John A. Stanturf;William H. Conner;Emile S. Gardiner;Callie Jo Schweitzer

  • Fire in southern forest landscapes

    John A. Stanturf;Dale D. Wade;Thomas A. Waldrop;Deborah K. Kennard

  • Eucalyptus beyond its native range: environmental issues in exotic bioenergy plantations.

    John A. Stanturf;Eric D. Vance;Thomas R. Fox;Matias Kirst

  • Woody biomass from short rotation energy crops.

    R.S. Zalesny;M.W. Cunningham;R.B. Hall;J. Mirck

  • What Is Forest Landscape Restoration

    David Lamb;John Stanturf;Palle Madsen

  • Adaptive measures: integrating adaptive forest management and forest landscape restoration

    Peter Spathelf;John Stanturf;Michael Kleine;Robert Jandl

  • Response of soil microbial community composition and function to a bottomland forest restoration intensity gradient

    Michael S. Strickland;Michael S. Strickland;Mac A. Callaham;Emile S. Gardiner;John A. Stanturf

  • Forest landscape restoration: integrating natural and social sciences

    John Stanturf;David Lamb;Palle Madsen

  • Effects of Forest Regrowth and Urbanization on Ecosystem Carbon Storage in a Rural-Urban Gradient in the Southeastern United States

    Chi Zhang;Hanqin Tian;Shufen Pan;Mingliang Liu

  • Social Vulnerability and Ebola Virus Disease in Rural Liberia.

    John A. Stanturf;Scott L. Goodrick;Melvin L. Warren;Susan Charnley

  • Biomass feedstock production systems: economic and environmental benefits

    Mark D. Coleman;John A. Stanturf

  • A goal-oriented approach to forest landscape restoration

    John Stanturf;Palle Madsen;David Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee E. Frelich
Lee E. Frelich University of Minnesota
Mac A. Callaham
Mac A. Callaham US Forest Service
Donato Chiatante
Donato Chiatante University of Insubria
Laurent Augusto
Laurent Augusto INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
David Paré
David Paré Natural Resources Canada
Lars Vesterdal
Lars Vesterdal University of Copenhagen
Yann Nouvellon
Yann Nouvellon University of Montpellier
Douglass F. Jacobs
Douglass F. Jacobs Purdue University West Lafayette
Gabriella S. Scippa
Gabriella S. Scippa University of Molise
Jean-Paul Laclau
Jean-Paul Laclau Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career options. For those interested in broadening their expertise, pursuing a cheapest online dsw programs can complement environmental knowledge with social work skills, addressing community impacts of environmental issues.

Students seeking flexibility might consider a budget friendly online general studies degree, which allows for a customizable curriculum blending environmental topics with other interests.

If you prefer a more streamlined path, an easy bachelor's degree in related fields can provide foundational knowledge without overwhelming course loads, ideal for balancing studies with other responsibilities.

For a focused scientific approach, a geology online degree offers specialized education in earth sciences, complementing environmental science careers in research, conservation, and policy.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Stanturf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles