World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
35771
World Ranking
9259
National Ranking
4778

Brian Claggett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Claggett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Brian Claggett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Claggett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Claggett is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Within this broad area, their research focuses significantly on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, with additional contributions to Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work is prominently featured in leading publication venues, reflecting ongoing engagement with cardiovascular and heart failure research. Frequent journals include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • European Heart Journal

Brian Claggett's main research topics cover a diverse range within cardiovascular and metabolic health. Key areas include:

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on heart failure therapies and cardiovascular outcomes, including the following papers:

  • "Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction" (2022), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials" (2022), published in The Lancet
  • "Estimating lifetime benefits of comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a comparative analysis of three randomised controlled trials" (2020), published in The Lancet
  • "Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories Over the Life Course" (2020), published in JAMA Cardiology
  • "Fewer Hospitalizations for Acute Cardiovascular Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020), published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Brian Claggett collaborates frequently with several researchers, contributing extensively through joint publications. Notable coauthors include:

  • Scott D. Solomon
  • John J.V. McMurray
  • Muthiah Vaduganathan
  • Pardeep S. Jhund
  • Akshay S. Desai

Best Publications

  • Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Bertram Pitt;Marc A. Pfeffer;Susan F. Assmann;Robin Boineau

  • Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Marc A. Pfeffer;Brian L. Claggett;Rafael Diaz;Kenneth Dickstein

  • Angiotensin-Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    Scott D. Solomon;John J.V. McMurray;Inder S. Anand;Junbo Ge

  • Regional Variation in Patients and Outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) Trial

    Marc A. Pfeffer;Brian Claggett;Susan F. Assmann;Robin Boineau

  • Impaired Systolic Function by Strain Imaging in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer;Amil M. Shah;Deepak K. Gupta;Angela Santos

  • Moving Beyond the Hazard Ratio in Quantifying the Between-Group Difference in Survival Analysis

    Hajime Uno;Brian Claggett;Lu Tian;Eisuke Inoue

  • Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

    Sara B Seidelmann;Brian Claggett;Susan Cheng;Mir Henglin

  • Estimating lifetime benefits of comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a comparative analysis of three randomised controlled trials

    Muthiah Vaduganathan;Brian L Claggett;Pardeep S Jhund;Jonathan W Cunningham

  • Influence of ejection fraction on outcomes and efficacy of spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    Scott D. Solomon;Brian Claggett;Eldrin F. Lewis;Akshay Desai

  • Effect of the angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients

    Akshay S. Desai;John J. V. McMurray;Milton Packer;Karl Swedberg

  • Declining Risk of Sudden Death in Heart Failure

    Li Shen;Pardeep S. Jhund;Mark C. Petrie;Mark C. Petrie;Brian L. Claggett

  • Prognostic Importance of Impaired Systolic Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and the Impact of Spironolactone.

    Amil M. Shah;Brian Claggett;Nancy K. Sweitzer;Sanjiv J. Shah

  • Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum

    Lars H. Lund;Brian Claggett;Jiankang Liu;Carolyn S. Lam

  • Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure

    Scott D. Solomon;Muthiah Vaduganathan;Brian L. Claggett;Milton Packer;Milton Packer

  • Renal Effects and Associated Outcomes During Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure

    Kevin Damman;Mauro Gori;Brian Claggett;Pardeep S. Jhund

  • Prognostic Implications of Changes in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure

    Michael R. Zile;Brian L. Claggett;Margaret F. Prescott;John J.V. McMurray

  • Effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on glycaemic control in patients with heart failure and diabetes: a post-hoc analysis from the PARADIGM-HF trial

    Jelena P. Seferovic;Brian L. Claggett;Sara B. Seidelmann;Ellen W. Seely

  • Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories Over the Life Course.

    Hongwei Ji;Hongwei Ji;Andy Kim;Andy Kim;Joseph E. Ebinger;Teemu J. Niiranen;Teemu J. Niiranen

  • Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF.

    John J.V. McMurray;Alice M. Jackson;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Margaret M. Redfield

  • Fewer Hospitalizations for Acute Cardiovascular Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Ankeet S. Bhatt;Alea Moscone;Erin E. McElrath;Anubodh S. Varshney

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
John J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray University of Glasgow
Amil M. Shah
Amil M. Shah Harvard University
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Akshay S. Desai
Akshay S. Desai Brigham and Women's Hospital
Eldrin F. Lewis
Eldrin F. Lewis Stanford University
Susan Cheng
Susan Cheng Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Michael R. Zile
Michael R. Zile Medical University of South Carolina
Karl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg University of Gothenburg
Bertram Pitt
Bertram Pitt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the medical field but looking for flexible study options, online degrees are increasingly popular. Many choose programs that blend healthcare with distance learning, allowing them to balance education with work or personal commitments.

Aspiring nurse practitioners may consider asn to np programs, which provide seamless tracks from associate degrees in nursing to advanced practice roles. Those seeking to avoid hands-on clinical hours can explore rn to bsn programs no clinicals, ideal for licensed nurses eager to advance their credentials entirely online.

Beyond nursing, options like a best online nutrition degree prepare graduates for careers in wellness, dietetics, and public health nutrition. When choosing any healthcare program, accreditation is vital; prospective students should look for which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? to ensure quality and employability.

Exploring these online degrees can open new career pathways in medicine and healthcare, offering diverse roles beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Claggett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles