World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
25712
World Ranking
16075
National Ranking
8090

Amil M. Shah publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amil M. Shah sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 600 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Amil M. Shah D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amil M. Shah sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amil M. Shah is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has made significant contributions primarily in the field of Medicine.

Their research predominantly focuses on several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology.

Shah's work covers key topics related to cardiovascular health and disease management, especially:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

The scientist's frequent publication venues reflect their focus on cardiovascular medicine, with numerous contributions to:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • European Heart Journal

Among recent papers, Shah's work includes studies such as:

  • "Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis With Incident Heart Failure," 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes," 2020, JAMA
  • "Lung function and cardiovascular disease: A link," 2020, Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • "Application of Diagnostic Algorithms for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction to the Community," 2020, JACC Heart Failure
  • "Left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure

Shah has collaborated frequently with several researchers in the cardiovascular field, including:

  • Scott D. Solomon
  • Brian Claggett
  • Kunihiro Matsushita
  • Christie M. Ballantyne
  • Hicham Skali

Best Publications

  • The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial

    Scott D. Solomon;Michael R. Zile;Burkert Pieske;Adriaan A Voors

  • Inotersen Treatment for Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

    Merrill D. Benson;Márcia Waddington-Cruz;John L. Berk;Michael Polydefkis

  • Vitamin D levels and early mortality among incident hemodialysis patients.

    M. Wolf;A. Shah;O. Gutierrez;E. Ankers

  • Impaired Systolic Function by Strain Imaging in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer;Amil M. Shah;Deepak K. Gupta;Angela Santos

  • Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

    Sara B Seidelmann;Brian Claggett;Susan Cheng;Mir Henglin

  • Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction In Perspective.

    Marc A. Pfeffer;Amil M. Shah;Barry A. Borlaug

  • Vitamin D Therapy and Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: The PRIMO Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ravi Thadhani;Evan Appelbaum;Yili Pritchett;Yuchiao Chang

  • Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

    James L. Januzzi;Margaret F. Prescott;Javed Butler;G. Michael Felker

  • Cardiac Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Baseline Findings From the Echocardiographic Study of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial

    Amil M. Shah;Sanjiv J. Shah;Inder S. Anand;Nancy K. Sweitzer

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    Viviany R Taqueti;Scott D Solomon;Amil M Shah;Akshay S Desai

  • Effects of Patisiran, an RNA Interference Therapeutic, on Cardiac Parameters in Patients With Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated Amyloidosis

    Scott D. Solomon;David Adams;Arnt Kristen;Martha Grogan

  • Prognostic Importance of Impaired Systolic Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and the Impact of Spironolactone.

    Amil M. Shah;Brian Claggett;Nancy K. Sweitzer;Sanjiv J. Shah

  • Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Reverse Remodeling and Relation to Outcome Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Scott D. Solomon;Elyse Foster;Mikhail Bourgoun;Amil Shah

  • Global Longitudinal Strain by Echocardiography Predicts Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in a Low-Risk General Population: The Copenhagen City Heart Study.

    Tor Biering-Sørensen;Sofie Reumert Biering-Sørensen;Flemming Javier Olsen;Morten Sengeløv

  • Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF.

    John J.V. McMurray;Alice M. Jackson;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Margaret M. Redfield

  • Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation by percutaneous annuloplasty: results of the TITAN Trial

    Tomasz Siminiak;Justina C. Wu;Michael Haude;Uta C. Hoppe

  • Prognostic Relevance of Left Atrial Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Angela B S Santos;Angela B S Santos;Gabriela Querejeta Roca;Brian Claggett;Nancy K. Sweitzer

  • Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Akshay S. Desai;Scott D. Solomon;Amil M. Shah;Brian L. Claggett

  • Cardiac Structure and Function and Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Amil M. Shah;Brian Claggett;Nancy K. Sweitzer;Sanjiv J. Shah

  • Vitamin D Therapy and Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

    Ravi Thadhani;Evan Appelbaum;Yili Pritchett;Julia Wenger

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brian Claggett
Brian Claggett Brigham and Women's Hospital
Susan Cheng
Susan Cheng Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Kunihiro Matsushita
Kunihiro Matsushita Johns Hopkins University
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University
Elizabeth Selvin
Elizabeth Selvin Johns Hopkins University
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Josef Coresh
Josef Coresh New York University
Thomas H. Mosley
Thomas H. Mosley University of Mississippi Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to a wide range of related degrees and specializations. Many students consider online programs that combine flexibility with affordability, allowing them to advance their education without pausing their careers.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, an affordable mha online can prepare you for executive roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical organizations. Alternatively, nurses looking to advance can benefit from enrolling in a cheapest dnp program, enabling them to reach the highest levels of clinical practice.

Pharmacy professionals may be interested in a 3-year online pharmd to deepen their expertise with the flexibility of remote study. If your passion lies in managing and securing medical data, pursuing a him bachelor's degree online can lead to rewarding positions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities, so prospective students should consider their career goals, budget, and preferred learning format when choosing the best program.

Best Scientists Citing Amil M. Shah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles