World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
34753
World Ranking
9637
National Ranking
373

Olivier R. Busch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier R. Busch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 483 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Olivier R. Busch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier R. Busch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier R. Busch is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in oncology and surgery. Their academic output spans several fields within medicine, with a strong emphasis on cancer-related studies and surgical interventions.

The main fields of study include Medicine, with a notable focus on the subfields of Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Epidemiology.

Their research covers main topics such as:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Olivier R. Busch has published numerous articles across prominent medical journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • HPB
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Pancreatology
  • Surgery

Recent papers feature a range of clinical and translational research topics, including:

  • "Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial," 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial," 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Effect of Early Surgery vs Endoscopy-First Approach on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis," 2020, JAMA
  • "Long-term yield of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals," 2021, Gut
  • "Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline," 2021, Endoscopy

Collaboration plays an important role in their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Bas Groot Koerkamp
  • Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
  • Casper H.J. van Eijck

Best Publications

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

    Joel Shapiro;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Pieter van Hagen

  • Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas

    Niels A van der Gaag;Erik A J Rauws;Casper H J van Eijck;Marco J Bruno

  • Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

    Dirk J. Gouma;Rutger C. I. van Geenen;Thomas M. van Gulik;Rob J. de Haan

  • Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.

    Guy E. Boeckxstaens;Vito Annese;Stanislas Bruley des Varannes;Stanislas Chaussade

  • Endoscopic versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis

    Djuna L Cahen;Dirk J Gouma;Yung Nio;Erik A J Rauws

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial

    Eva Versteijne;Mustafa Suker;Karin Groothuis;Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar

  • Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

    O R Busch;W C Hop;M A Hoynck van Papendrecht;R L Marquet

  • Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

    Markus K. Diener;Christoph M. Seiler;Inga Rossion;Jörg Kleeff

  • Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated.

    Wouter L Curvers;Fiebo J ten Kate;Kausilia K Krishnadath;Mike Visser

  • Outcomes of Treatment for Achalasia Depend on Manometric Subtype

    Wout O. Rohof;Renato Salvador;Vito Annese;Stanislas Bruley des Varannes

  • Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2) : a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial

    Jony van Hilst;Thijs de Rooij;Koop Bosscha;David J Brinkman

  • Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial

    Ben M Eyck;J Jan B van Lanschot;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Berend J van der Wilk

  • Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Thijs de Rooij;Jony van Hilst;Hjalmar van Santvoort;Djamila Boerma

  • Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

    N Tjarda van Heek;Koert F. D. Kuhlmann;Rob J. Scholten;Steve M. M. de Castro

  • Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy

    An Moonen;Vito Annese;Ann Belmans;Albert J Bredenoord

  • Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen.

    Pieter Boele van Hensbroek;Jan Wind;Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf;Olivier R. C. Busch

  • Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients

    K.F.D. Kuhlmann;S.M.M. de Castro;J.G. Wesseling;F.J.W. ten Kate

  • Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

    Djuna L. Cahen;Dirk J. Gouma;Philippe Laramée;Yung Nio

  • Assessment of Future Remnant Liver Function Using Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy in Patients Undergoing Major Liver Resection

    Wilmar de Graaf;Krijn P. van Lienden;Sander Dinant;Joris J. T. H. Roelofs

  • Endoscopic Versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial

    Djuna L. Cahen;Dirk J. Gouma;Yung Nio;Myriam Delhaye

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Thomas M. van Gulik
Thomas M. van Gulik University of Amsterdam
Dirk J. Gouma
Dirk J. Gouma University of Amsterdam
Casper H.J. van Eijck
Casper H.J. van Eijck Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh Maastricht University
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Utrecht University
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam
Jeanin E. van Hooft
Jeanin E. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Fiebo J.W. ten Kate
Fiebo J.W. ten Kate Utrecht University
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers but looking for flexible education options, a growing number of online programs make it easier than ever to advance or pivot your path. Many students consider cheapest online nurse practitioner programs to train for advanced patient care roles, often while working.

Entry-level and mid-career nurses can benefit from nursing school online, which offers accredited degrees with schedule flexibility. Online bridging programs, such as the cheapest rn to bsn program, help registered nurses obtain a bachelor’s degree to unlock more job opportunities and higher salaries.

For those aiming for leadership, research, or teaching positions, pursuing an online phd in nursing is a viable route, allowing you to reach the top of your profession with less disruption to your career.

Overall, these pathways provide alternatives to traditional medical degrees and support ongoing workforce demand in the U.S. health system, with many affordable and accessible online options available.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier R. Busch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles