World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh

Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
26437
World Ranking
17015
National Ranking
640

Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 579 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and has a substantial body of work in the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery and oncology.

Their research primarily addresses critical topics such as:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

They have published extensively in leading medical journals, with significant frequent venues including:

  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • HPB
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery
  • British Journal of Surgery

Among their recent papers are several notable studies:

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Appendiceal Tumours and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: Literature Review with PSOGI/EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment, 2020, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Total Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Versus Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine-based Chemoradiotherapy and Adjuvant Gemcitabine for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (PREOPANC-2 Trial): Study Protocol for a Nationwide Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, BMC Cancer
  • The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei After Cytoreductive Surgery, 2021, JAMA Surgery
  • Peritoneal Mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up, 2020, European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Their frequent collaborators include several researchers with whom they have co-authored extensively:

  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Bas Groot Koerkamp
  • Olivier R. Busch
  • Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • Martijn W.J. Stommel

Best Publications

  • Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

    Willemien J. van Driel;Simone N. Koole;Karolina Sikorska;Jules H. Schagen van Leeuwen

  • Early- and Long-Term Outcome Data of Patients With Pseudomyxoma Peritonei From Appendiceal Origin Treated by a Strategy of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

    Terence C. Chua;Brendan J. Moran;Paul H. Sugarbaker;Edward A. Levine

  • Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas

    Niels A van der Gaag;Erik A J Rauws;Casper H J van Eijck;Marco J Bruno

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial

    Eva Versteijne;Mustafa Suker;Karin Groothuis;Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar

  • Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: a population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors.

    Irene Thomassen;Yvette R. van Gestel;Bert van Ramshorst;Misha D. Luyer

  • Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2) : a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial

    Jony van Hilst;Thijs de Rooij;Koop Bosscha;David J Brinkman

  • Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Thijs de Rooij;Jony van Hilst;Hjalmar van Santvoort;Djamila Boerma

  • Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    David W da Costa;Stefan A Bouwense;Nicolien J Schepers;Marc G Besselink

  • Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.

    Birgitta M E Hansson;Nicholas J Slater;Arjan Schouten van der Velden;Hans M M Groenewoud

  • Predictors and survival of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: A population-based study

    Valery E. Lemmens;Yvonne L. Klaver;Vic J. Verwaal;Harm J. Rutten

  • Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality

    R. F. de Wilde;M. G. H. Besselink;I. van der Tweel;I. H. J. T. de Hingh

  • Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and International External Validation.

    Timothy H. Mungroop;L. Bengt Van Rijssen;David Van Klaveren;F. Jasmijn Smits

  • Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival

    G A Gooiker;V E P P Lemmens;M G Besselink;O R Busch

  • Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer (COLOPEC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial

    Charlotte E L Klaver;Daniel D Wisselink;Cornelis J A Punt;Petur Snaebjornsson

  • Cytoreduction and HIPEC in the Netherlands: nationwide long-term outcome following the Dutch protocol.

    Anke M. J. Kuijpers;Boj Mirck;Arend G. J. Aalbers;Simon W. Nienhuijs

  • Patterns of metachronous metastases after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.

    Yvette R.B.M. van Gestel;Ignace H.J.T. de Hingh;Myrthe P.P. van Herk-Sukel;Felice N. van Erning

  • Reduction of Postoperative Ileus by Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Major Rectal Surgery Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Petra G. Boelens;Fanny F. B. M. Heesakkers;Misha D. P. Luyer;Kevin W. Y. van Barneveld

  • Outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with chemotherapy with and without targeted therapy

    Y.L.B. Klaver;L.H.J. Simkens;V.E.P.P. Lemmens;M. Koopman

  • Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Thijs de Rooij;Jony van Hilst;Jantien A Vogel;Hjalmar C van Santvoort

  • Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT

    Willemien J. van Driel;Simone N. Koole;Karolina Sikorska;Jules H. Schagen van Leeuwen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Olivier R. Busch
Olivier R. Busch University of Amsterdam
Casper H.J. van Eijck
Casper H.J. van Eijck Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Utrecht University
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam
Dirk J. Gouma
Dirk J. Gouma University of Amsterdam
Pieter J. Tanis
Pieter J. Tanis University of Amsterdam
Harry van Goor
Harry van Goor Radboud University
David L. Morris
David L. Morris University of New South Wales
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Cornelis J. A. Punt University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Medicine in the USA offers diverse educational routes and career pathways. Whether you’re seeking a traditional medical degree or alternative options in healthcare, online programs provide flexibility and accessibility for many students.

For those aiming to advance in nursing leadership, easiest online dnp programs can help qualified nurses achieve the highest level of practice with manageable admissions and coursework requirements. If you're looking to join the workforce quickly, a 6 month lpn program online is a fast-track option to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in record time.

Mental health is a growing field with significant demand. The shortest online pmhnp programs prepare registered nurses to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners more quickly, allowing for faster entry into specialized care roles.

Not every career in healthcare requires patient care; management and administration are crucial roles. Consider the cheapest online healthcare administration degree options to gain essential leadership and business skills without incurring significant debt.

Best Scientists Citing Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles