World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
37841
World Ranking
12498
National Ranking
480

Casper H.J. van Eijck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casper H.J. van Eijck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 511 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Casper H.J. van Eijck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casper H.J. van Eijck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Casper H.J. van Eijck is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Oncology and Surgery. The scientist's contributions also extend to Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Epidemiology.

Their main research topics include pancreatic and hepatic oncology, pancreatitis pathology and treatment, cancer genomics and diagnostics, neuroendocrine tumor research advances, gallbladder and bile duct disorders, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, and renal cell carcinoma treatment.

Casper H.J. van Eijck has published extensively in prominent journals. The frequent venues for their work include:

  • HPB
  • Pancreatology
  • Annals of Surgery
  • British Journal of Surgery
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Bas Groot Koerkamp
  • Olivier R. Busch
  • Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • Bert A. Bonsing

Some of their recent publications include:

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Immediate versus Postponed Intervention for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Effect of Early Surgery vs Endoscopy-First Approach on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis, 2020, JAMA
  • Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2021, European Journal of Cancer
  • Total neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2 trial): study protocol for a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial, 2021, BMC Cancer

Best Publications

  • A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis

    Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Marc G. Besselink;Olaf J. Bakker;H. Sijbrand Hofker

  • Treatment With the Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analog [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]Octreotate: Toxicity, Efficacy, and Survival

    Dik J. Kwekkeboom;Wouter W. de Herder;Boen L. Kam;Casper H. van Eijck

  • Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Marc G. H. Besselink;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Erik Buskens;Erik Buskens;Marja A. Boermeester

  • Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas

    Niels A van der Gaag;Erik A J Rauws;Casper H J van Eijck;Marco J Bruno

  • FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

    Mustafa Suker;Berend R Beumer;Eran Sadot;Lysiane Marthey

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial

    Eva Versteijne;Mustafa Suker;Karin Groothuis;Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar

  • Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial.

    Olaf J. Bakker;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Sandra van Brunschot;Ronald B. Geskus

  • A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome.

    Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Olaf J. Bakker;Thomas L. Bollen;Marc G. Besselink

  • Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analog [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]Octreotate in Patients With Endocrine Gastroenteropancreatic Tumors

    Dik J. Kwekkeboom;Jaap J. Teunissen;Willem H. Bakker;Peter P. Kooij

  • Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis : A multicentre randomised trial

    Sandra van Brunschot;Janneke van Grinsven;Hjalmar C van Santvoort;Olaf J Bakker

  • Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.

    Khe T. C. Tran;Hans G. Smeenk;Casper H. J. van Eijck;Geert Kazemier

  • Long-Term Efficacy, Survival, and Safety of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic and Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors

    Tessa Brabander;Wouter A. van der Zwan;Jaap J.M. Teunissen;Boen L.R. Kam

  • High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

    Koen de Jong;C. Yung Nio;John J. Hermans;Marcel G. Dijkgraaf

  • Somatostatin receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

    Dik J Kwekkeboom;Boen L Kam;Martijn van Essen;Jaap J M Teunissen

  • Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2) : a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial

    Jony van Hilst;Thijs de Rooij;Koop Bosscha;David J Brinkman

  • Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial.

    Suzanne M. Jeurnink;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Jeanin E. van Hooft;Casper H.J. van Eijck

  • Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Thijs de Rooij;Jony van Hilst;Hjalmar van Santvoort;Djamila Boerma

  • Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    David W da Costa;Stefan A Bouwense;Nicolien J Schepers;Marc G Besselink

  • Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality

    R. F. de Wilde;M. G. H. Besselink;I. van der Tweel;I. H. J. T. de Hingh

  • Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review

    Suzanne M Jeurnink;Casper H J van Eijck;Ewout W Steyerberg;Ernst J Kuipers

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Utrecht University
Olivier R. Busch
Olivier R. Busch University of Amsterdam
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh Maastricht University
Harry van Goor
Harry van Goor Radboud University
Marja A. Boermeester
Marja A. Boermeester University of Amsterdam
Hein G. Gooszen
Hein G. Gooszen Radboud University
Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the medical field but looking for flexible learning options? There are several online degree pathways that can launch or advance your healthcare career. These programs are especially valuable for working professionals, career changers, or those seeking affordability and convenience.

For those leaning toward leadership, affordable online mha programs prepare you for management roles in hospitals and other healthcare organizations. If you're ready for an advanced clinical credential, the cheapest online dnp programs can help you become a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Aspiring pharmacists can find flexible options through pharmacy school online programs, making it possible to pursue this respected career path from a distance. If you’re interested in data and technology, consider online rhit degree programs to work in health information management—a fast-growing field that bridges healthcare and IT.

Each program offers unique advantages, so explore your options to find the best fit for your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Casper H.J. van Eijck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles