What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Surgery
- Internal medicine
- Disease
Hein G. Gooszen focuses on Surgery, Pancreatitis, Randomized controlled trial, Acute pancreatitis and Pancreatic disease.
The concepts of his Surgery study are interwoven with issues in Relative risk and General surgery.
His Pancreatitis study is concerned with the larger field of Gastroenterology.
His Randomized controlled trial research incorporates elements of Cholecystectomy, Reflux, Nissen fundoplication and Clinical trial.
His Acute pancreatitis research is classified as research in Internal medicine.
His Percutaneous study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Enterocutaneous fistula and Debridement.
His most cited work include:
- Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus (2672 citations)
- Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (931 citations)
- A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis (880 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Hein G. Gooszen mostly deals with Surgery, Internal medicine, Pancreatitis, Acute pancreatitis and Gastroenterology.
His work deals with themes such as Nissen fundoplication and General surgery, which intersect with Surgery.
His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Placebo and Endocrinology.
His Pancreatitis study also includes fields such as
- Percutaneous, which have a strong connection to Debridement,
- Clinical endpoint that intertwine with fields like Relative risk.
His Acute pancreatitis study combines topics in areas such as Probiotic, Necrosis, Immunology and Parenteral nutrition, Intensive care medicine.
Hein G. Gooszen has included themes like Laparoscopy and Endoscopy in his Prospective cohort study study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Surgery (43.77%)
- Internal medicine (36.70%)
- Pancreatitis (33.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?
- Surgery (43.77%)
- Pancreatitis (33.33%)
- Internal medicine (36.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Surgery, Pancreatitis, Internal medicine, Acute pancreatitis and Randomized controlled trial.
Specifically, his work in Surgery is concerned with the study of Clinical endpoint.
His Pancreatitis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Post-hoc analysis, Interquartile range, Endoscopy and General surgery.
In Internal medicine, Hein G. Gooszen works on issues like Gastroenterology, which are connected to Early detection, Cumulative incidence, Medical therapy and Rifaximin.
His studies deal with areas such as Parenteral nutrition, Intensive care medicine, Blood urea nitrogen and Inflammation as well as Acute pancreatitis.
His Randomized controlled trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cholangiography, Placebo, Gallstones, Cholecystectomy and Biliary sphincterotomy.
Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis : A multicentre randomised trial (196 citations)
- Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial (145 citations)
- Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis and Progression to Chronic Pancreatitis After a First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis (106 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Disease
His primary areas of investigation include Pancreatitis, Surgery, Acute pancreatitis, Internal medicine and Endoscopy.
His Necrotising pancreatitis study in the realm of Pancreatitis interacts with subjects such as In patient.
His studies in Surgery integrate themes in fields like Odds ratio and Relative risk, Confidence interval.
His research in Acute pancreatitis tackles topics such as Intensive care medicine which are related to areas like Treatment options.
His research in the fields of Meta-analysis, Pancreatitis, chronic and Quality of life overlaps with other disciplines such as Psychological intervention.
His study explores the link between Clinical endpoint and topics such as Intention-to-treat analysis that cross with problems in Superiority Trial, Gallstones, Debridement, Standard treatment and Cholecystitis.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
