Hein G. Gooszen focuses on Surgery, Pancreatitis, Randomized controlled trial, Acute pancreatitis and Pancreatic disease. The concepts of his Surgery study are interwoven with issues in Relative risk and General surgery. His Pancreatitis study is concerned with the larger field of Gastroenterology.
His Randomized controlled trial research incorporates elements of Cholecystectomy, Reflux, Nissen fundoplication and Clinical trial. His Acute pancreatitis research is classified as research in Internal medicine. His Percutaneous study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Enterocutaneous fistula and Debridement.
Hein G. Gooszen mostly deals with Surgery, Internal medicine, Pancreatitis, Acute pancreatitis and Gastroenterology. His work deals with themes such as Nissen fundoplication and General surgery, which intersect with Surgery. His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Placebo and Endocrinology.
His Pancreatitis study also includes fields such as
His primary areas of study are Surgery, Pancreatitis, Internal medicine, Acute pancreatitis and Randomized controlled trial. Specifically, his work in Surgery is concerned with the study of Clinical endpoint. His Pancreatitis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Post-hoc analysis, Interquartile range, Endoscopy and General surgery.
In Internal medicine, Hein G. Gooszen works on issues like Gastroenterology, which are connected to Early detection, Cumulative incidence, Medical therapy and Rifaximin. His studies deal with areas such as Parenteral nutrition, Intensive care medicine, Blood urea nitrogen and Inflammation as well as Acute pancreatitis. His Randomized controlled trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cholangiography, Placebo, Gallstones, Cholecystectomy and Biliary sphincterotomy.
His primary areas of investigation include Pancreatitis, Surgery, Acute pancreatitis, Internal medicine and Endoscopy. His Necrotising pancreatitis study in the realm of Pancreatitis interacts with subjects such as In patient. His studies in Surgery integrate themes in fields like Odds ratio and Relative risk, Confidence interval.
His research in Acute pancreatitis tackles topics such as Intensive care medicine which are related to areas like Treatment options. His research in the fields of Meta-analysis, Pancreatitis, chronic and Quality of life overlaps with other disciplines such as Psychological intervention. His study explores the link between Clinical endpoint and topics such as Intention-to-treat analysis that cross with problems in Superiority Trial, Gallstones, Debridement, Standard treatment and Cholecystitis.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus
Peter A Banks;Thomas L Bollen;Christos Dervenis;Hein G Gooszen.
A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Marc G. Besselink;Olaf J. Bakker;H. Sijbrand Hofker.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2010)
Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Marc G. H. Besselink;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Erik Buskens;Erik Buskens;Marja A. Boermeester.
The Lancet (2008)
Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial.
Olaf J. Bakker;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Sandra van Brunschot;Ronald B. Geskus.
A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome.
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Olaf J. Bakker;Thomas L. Bollen;Marc G. Besselink.
Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial
JE Bais;Jfwm Bartelsman;HJ Bonjer;MA Cuesta.
The Lancet (2000)
Systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage as primary treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis
M. C. van Baal;H. C. van Santvoort;T. L. Bollen;O. J. Bakker.
British Journal of Surgery (2010)
Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial
Oddeke van Ruler;Cecilia W. Mahler;Kimberly R. Boer;E. Ascelijn Reuland.
Timing of Surgical Intervention in Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Marc G. H. Besselink;Thomas J. Verwer;Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers;Erik Buskens.
Archives of Surgery (2007)
Results and Complications after Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: A Meta-Analysis of 43 Observational Studies Comprising 9,317 Patients
Willem E. Hueting;Erik Buskens;Ingeborg van der Tweel;Hein G. Gooszen.
Digestive Surgery (2005)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: