World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 12982 12218 497 483 404 36048

Hein G. Gooszen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hein G. Gooszen between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hein G. Gooszen published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2006. 2 of the 416 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2006. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1985 2026

416 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hein G. Gooszen: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 4
1989 3
1990 5
1991 3
1992 6
1993 7
1994 12
1995 6
1996 2
1997 6
1998 13
1999 9
2000 12
2001 6
2002 7
2003 9
2004 8
2005 20
2006 32
2007 24
2008 31
2009 30
2010 20
2011 17
2012 20
2013 23
2014 22
2015 15
2016 13
2017 8
2018 6
2019 6
2020 1
2021 4
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
2026 1
Total 416
Download as CSV

Hein G. Gooszen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hein G. Gooszen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 404
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hein G. Gooszen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hein G. Gooszen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hein G. Gooszen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed to various fields within medicine and health professions. Their work primarily spans the domains of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, oncology, emergency medical services, and information systems and management.

Their research encompasses a range of topics including cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, patient safety and medication errors, pancreatitis pathology and treatment, pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, intestinal malrotation and obstruction disorders, personal information management and user behavior, and the impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare.

Hein G. Gooszen has published papers in several peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • JAMA Surgery
  • Anaesthesia
  • BMJ Open
  • International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations
  • Heliyon

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Gooszen provide insights into surgical and healthcare management issues. These include:

  • "An observational study of distractions in the operating theatre" (2020, Anaesthesia)
  • "Development of a decision analytical framework to prioritise operating room capacity: lessons learnt from an empirical example on delayed elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital in the Netherlands" (2022, BMJ Open)
  • "Long-Term Outcomes of Early Surgery vs Endoscopy First in Chronic Pancreatitis" (2024, JAMA Surgery)
  • "A protocol for the implementation of new technology in a highly complex hospital environment: the operating room" (2020, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations)
  • "Time pressure in surgical teams, a help or a hindrance to patient safety?" (2025, Heliyon)

The scientist collaborates frequently with a consistent group of co-authors. Those collaborators include:

  • Annet van Harten
  • Jur Koksma
  • Theo Niessen
  • Tineke Abma
  • Charlotte L. van Veldhuisen

Best Publications

  • Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus

    Peter A Banks;Thomas L Bollen;Christos Dervenis;Hein G Gooszen

  • A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis

    Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Marc G. Besselink;Olaf J. Bakker;H. Sijbrand Hofker

  • Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Marc G. H. Besselink;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Erik Buskens;Erik Buskens;Marja A. Boermeester

  • Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial.

    Olaf J. Bakker;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Sandra van Brunschot;Ronald B. Geskus

  • A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome.

    Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Olaf J. Bakker;Thomas L. Bollen;Marc G. Besselink

  • Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis : A multicentre randomised trial

    Sandra van Brunschot;Janneke van Grinsven;Hjalmar C van Santvoort;Olaf J Bakker

  • Systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage as primary treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis

    M. C. van Baal;H. C. van Santvoort;T. L. Bollen;O. J. Bakker

  • Timing and impact of infections in acute pancreatitis.

    M. G. Besselink;H. C. van Santvoort;M. A. Boermeester;V. B. Nieuwenhuijs

  • Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial

    Oddeke van Ruler;Cecilia W. Mahler;Kimberly R. Boer;E. Ascelijn Reuland

  • The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited

    T.L. Bollen;H.C. van Santvoort;M.G.H. Besselink;M.S. van Leeuwen

  • Timing of Surgical Intervention in Necrotizing Pancreatitis

    Marc G. H. Besselink;Thomas J. Verwer;Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers;Erik Buskens

  • Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial

    JE Bais;Jfwm Bartelsman;HJ Bonjer;MA Cuesta

  • Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    David W da Costa;Stefan A Bouwense;Nicolien J Schepers;Marc G Besselink

  • Timing of Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis A Systematic Review

    Mark C. van Baal;Marc G. Besselink;Olaf J. Bakker;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort

  • Impact of characteristics of organ failure and infected necrosis on mortality in necrotising pancreatitis

    Nicolien J Schepers;Olaf J Bakker;Marc G Besselink;Usama Ahmed Ali

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

    J A J L Broeders;F A Mauritz;U Ahmed Ali;W A Draaisma

  • Enteral nutrition and the risk of mortality and infectious complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Maxim S. Petrov;Hjalmar C. van Santvoort;Marc G. H. Besselink;Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden

  • Results and Complications after Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: A Meta-Analysis of 43 Observational Studies Comprising 9,317 Patients

    Willem E. Hueting;Erik Buskens;Ingeborg van der Tweel;Hein G. Gooszen

  • Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis

    Oddeke van Ruler;Cecilia W. Mahler;Kimberly R. Boer;E. Ascelijn Reuland

  • Probiotic prophylaxis In predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    M G Besselink;H C van Santvoort;E Buskens;M A Boermeester

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Utrecht University
Marja A. Boermeester
Marja A. Boermeester University of Amsterdam
Casper H.J. van Eijck
Casper H.J. van Eijck Erasmus University Rotterdam
Harry van Goor
Harry van Goor Radboud University
Erik Buskens
Erik Buskens University Medical Center Groningen
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Cornelis H.C. Dejong
Cornelis H.C. Dejong Maastricht University
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can open multiple pathways beyond a traditional medical degree. For those interested in healthcare management, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online offers a route to leadership roles in hospitals or medical organizations—often in less time than traditional programs.

Registered nurses looking to advance can consider asn to np programs. These bridge programs help nurses earn a master’s degree and become nurse practitioners, significantly expanding their clinical and career opportunities.

If nutrition and wellness is your passion, pursuing an online dietitian degree can lead to a rewarding career as a dietitian or nutrition consultant. This field is rapidly growing, especially with the increased focus on preventive healthcare.

Finally, professionals seeking an advanced credential to move into executive positions should explore the best mha programs available online. These accredited programs prepare graduates for high-level administrative roles while offering the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Hein G. Gooszen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles