World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
17761
World Ranking
9475
National Ranking
83

Galit Shmueli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galit Shmueli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Galit Shmueli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galit Shmueli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Galit Shmueli is affiliated with National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan and has a research focus primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Safety Research, Management Information Systems, and Information Systems and Management.

The core topics of their research include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Big Data and Business Intelligence, Advanced Causal Inference Techniques, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference, as well as Privacy, Security, and Data Protection.

Recent research publications by Galit Shmueli include the following papers:

  • "Beyond Overall Treatment Effects: Leveraging Covariates in Randomized Experiments Guided by Causal Structure," 2020, published in Information Systems Research
  • "Barriers to academic data science research in the new realm of algorithmic behaviour modification by digital platforms," 2022, published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • "How to "improve" prediction using behavior modification," 2022, published in International Journal of Forecasting
  • "Taking the Person Seriously: Ethically Aware IS Research in the Era of Reinforcement Learning-Based Personalization," 2023, published in Journal of the Association for Information Systems
  • "How Can IJDS Authors, Reviewers, and Editors Use (and Misuse) Generative AI?," 2023, published in INFORMS Journal on Data Science

Frequently collaborating with Galit Shmueli are coauthors such as Travis Greene, Ali Tafti, David Martens, Soumya Ray, and Suneel Babu Chatla. Travis Greene appears as the most frequent coauthor, followed by Ali Tafti and others.

Shmueli's publications frequently appear in venues including arXiv (Cornell University), INFORMS Journal on Data Science, SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, and Information Systems Research. The highest number of publications is found in arXiv, followed by other prominent journals and platforms.

Best Publications

  • To Explain or to Predict

    Galit Shmueli

  • Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict

    Galit Shmueli;Marko Sarstedt;Joseph F. Hair;Jun-Hwa Cheah

  • The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models

    Galit Shmueli;Soumya Ray;Juan Manuel Velasquez Estrada;Suneel Babu Chatla

  • Research Commentary---Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p-Value Problem

    Mingfeng Lin;Henry C. Lucas;Galit Shmueli

  • Predictive analytics in information systems research

    Galit Shmueli;Otto R. Koppius

  • A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution

    Galit Shmueli;Thomas P. Minka;Joseph B. Kadane;Sharad Borle

  • Data Mining for Business Intelligence: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner

    Galit Shmueli;Nitin R. Patel;Peter C. Bruce

  • A flexible regression model for count data

    Kimberly F. Sellers;Galit Shmueli

  • Statistical challenges facing early outbreak detection in biosurveillance

    Galit Shmueli;Howard Burkom

  • Early statistical detection of anthrax outbreaks by tracking over-the-counter medication sales

    Anna Goldenberg;Galit Shmueli;Richard A. Caruana;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • Prediction‐Oriented Model Selection in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

    Pratyush Nidhi Sharma;Galit Shmueli;Marko Sarstedt;Nicholas Patrick Danks

  • The COM-Poisson model for count data: a survey of methods and applications

    Kimberly F. Sellers;Sharad Borle;Galit Shmueli

  • Automated time series forecasting for biosurveillance

    Howard S. Burkom;Sean Patrick Murphy;Galit Shmueli

  • Consumer surplus in online auctions

    Ravi Bapna;Wolfgang Jank;Galit Shmueli

  • One-Way Mirrors in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment

    Ravi Bapna;Jui Ramaprasad;Galit Shmueli;Akhmed Umyarov

  • Explaining and Forecasting Online Auction Prices and Their Dynamics Using Functional Data Analysis

    Shanshan Wang;Wolfgang Jank;Galit Shmueli

  • Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions

    Ravi Bapna;Wolfgang Jank;Galit Shmueli

  • On information quality

    Ron S. Kenett;Ron S. Kenett;Galit Shmueli

  • Conjugate Analysis of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson Distribution

    Joseph B. Kadane;Galit Shmueli;Thomas P. Minka;Sharad Borle

  • Functional Data Analysis in Electronic Commerce Research

    Wolfgang Jank;Galit Shmueli

  • PLS-Based Model Selection: The Role of Alternative Explanations in Information Systems Research

    Pratyush Nidhi Sharma;Marko Sarstedt;Galit Shmueli;Kevin Hyunkyung Kim

  • Early Stastical Detection of Anthrax Out-breaks by Tracking Over-the-Counter Medication Sales

    Anna Goldenberg;Galit Shmueli

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi Bapna
Ravi Bapna University of Minnesota
Marko Sarstedt
Marko Sarstedt Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Joseph B. Kadane
Joseph B. Kadane Carnegie Mellon University
Catherine Plaisant
Catherine Plaisant University of Maryland, College Park
Ben Shneiderman
Ben Shneiderman University of Maryland, College Park
Tom Minka
Tom Minka Microsoft (United States)
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Gerhard Tutz
Gerhard Tutz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Kevin H. Kim
Kevin H. Kim University of Pittsburgh
Rob J. Hyndman
Rob J. Hyndman Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science opens new doors for students at all stages of their careers. Many learners consider pursuing a most worthwhile masters degrees to boost their expertise and job prospects in fields like software engineering, AI, and cybersecurity.

For those new to the field or seeking a faster, more cost-effective entry point, an online associate degree in Computer Science offers foundational skills and can lead to entry-level roles in IT and tech support.

Cost and admissions requirements are common concerns. Fortunately, there are many cheapest online degrees available, allowing students to save on tuition while still earning valuable credentials.

If your academic history is a concern, don’t worry—numerous online colleges that accept low gpa offer supportive pathways for learners of all backgrounds to pursue their tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Galit Shmueli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles