World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3403 1641 127 8903

Kevin H. Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin H. Kim between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin H. Kim published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2011. 1 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2011. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
2001 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin H. Kim: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 13
2007 5
2008 7
2009 2
2010 14
2011 22
2012 19
2013 18
2014 13
2015 17
2016 5
2017 7
2018 1
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Kevin H. Kim publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin H. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 127
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin H. Kim D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin H. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kevin H. Kim was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with specific subfields including Rehabilitation, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

Their recent publications covered several topics related to orthopedic surgery and public health. These included studies on elbow and forearm trauma treatment, orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation, and bone fractures and their treatments.

Notable published works by Kevin H. Kim were:

  • Physical activity as a moderator of the association between central obesity and Type 2 diabetes in Asian American older adults, 2025, published in Obesity Pillars
  • To Reconstruct or Not: A Case of Acute Reconstruction of the Forearm Interosseous Membrane with CMC Mini Tight Rope, 2023, published in Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
  • Lifestyle habits and obesity progression in overweight and obese American young adults: Lessons for promoting cardiometabolic health, 2020, published in UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors in their research included Nailah F. Mubin, Hannah Groff, Elizabeth Morrison, EunSeok Cha, and Margeaux K. Akazawa.

Kevin H. Kim's regular publication venues consisted of:

  • Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
  • UNC Libraries
  • Obesity Pillars

Best Publications

  • Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques.

    Eun Seok Cha;Kevin H. Kim;Judith A. Erlen

  • Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics.

    James M. Henson;Steven P. Reise;Kevin H. Kim

  • The Relation Among Fit Indexes, Power, and Sample Size in Structural Equation Modeling

    Kevin H. Kim

  • On the Relationship Among Social Anxiety, Intimacy, Sexual Communication, and Sexual Satisfaction in Young Couples

    Jennifer L. Montesi;Bradley T. Conner;Elizabeth A. Gordon;Robert L. Fauber

  • Immunological effects of induced shame and guilt.

    Sally S. Dickerson;Margaret E. Kemeny;Najib Aziz;Kevin H. Kim

  • Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review

    Christine M. Sarteschi;Michael G. Vaughn;Kevin Kim

  • Health literacy, self-efficacy, food label use, and diet in young adults.

    EunSeok Cha;Kevin H. Kim;Hannah M. Lerner;Colleen R. Dawkins

  • Exploring communication, trust in government, and vaccination intention later in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: results of a national survey.

    Sandra Crouse Quinn;John Parmer;Vicki S. Freimuth;Karen M. Hilyard

  • The Social Ecological Model as a Framework for Determinants of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Uptake in the United States

    Supriya Kumar;Sandra Crouse Quinn;Kevin H. Kim;Donald Musa

  • A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of an Abbreviated Social Support Instrument: The MOS-SSS

    Christopher D. Gjesfjeld;Catherine G. Greeno;Kevin H. Kim

  • Waterpipe Smoking Among U.S. University Students

    Brian A. Primack;Ariel Shensa;Kevin H. Kim;Mary V. Carroll

  • Trust During the Early Stages of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic

    Vicki S Freimuth;Don Musa;Karen Hilyard;Sandra Crouse Quinn

  • An Illustration of Multilevel Factor Analysis

    Steven P. Reise;Joseph Ventura;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Kevin H. Kim

  • A Text Message Alcohol Intervention for Young Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Brian Suffoletto;Jeffrey Kristan;Clifton Callaway;Kevin H. Kim

  • The impact of workplace policies and other social factors on self-reported influenza-like illness incidence during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

    Supriya Kumar;Sandra Crouse Quinn;Kevin H. Kim;Laura H. Daniel

  • Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: A metaanalysis of 610 patients

    Suzanne C. Schiffman;Kevin H. Kim;Allan Tsung;J. Wallis Marsh

  • From Child Welfare to Juvenile Justice Race, Gender, and System Experiences

    Sara A. Goodkind;Jeffrey J. Shook;Kevin H. Kim;Ryan T. Pohlig

  • PLS-Based Model Selection: The Role of Alternative Explanations in Information Systems Research

    Pratyush Nidhi Sharma;Marko Sarstedt;Galit Shmueli;Kevin Hyunkyung Kim

  • Economic Stress, Social Support, and Maternal Depression: Is Social Support Deterioration Occurring.

    Christopher D. Gjesfjeld;Catherine G. Greeno;Kevin H. Kim;Carol M. Anderson

  • Evaluating the Theory of Planned Behavior to explain intention to engage in premarital sex amongst Korean college students: a questionnaire survey.

    Eun Seok Cha;Willa M. Doswell;Kevin H. Kim;Denise Charron-Prochownik

  • Complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

    Lauren Terhorst;Michael J. Schneider;Kevin H. Kim;Lee M. Goozdich

  • TheImpactofWorkplacePoliciesandOtherSocialFactors onSelf-ReportedInfluenza-LikeIllnessIncidenceDuring the2009H1N1Pandemic

    Supriya Kumar;Sandra Crouse Quinn;Kevin H. Kim;Laura H. Daniel

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra Crouse Quinn
Sandra Crouse Quinn University of Maryland, College Park
Brian A. Primack
Brian A. Primack Oregon State University
David A. Geller
David A. Geller University of Pittsburgh
Tammy Chung
Tammy Chung Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michael J. Fine
Michael J. Fine United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Lisa H. Butterfield
Lisa H. Butterfield University of California, San Francisco
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh
Vicki S. Freimuth
Vicki S. Freimuth University of Georgia
Susan M. Sereika
Susan M. Sereika University of Pittsburgh
Michael H. Antoni
Michael H. Antoni University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse and rewarding career options. Many students are now turning to online programs for greater flexibility and accessibility. When considering online degrees in psychology, affordability is often a concern. You may find helpful options by reviewing the psychology degree cost across accredited schools.

Admission competitiveness is another key issue, especially for those interested in social work. If you're aiming for a more accessible route, check out msw programs with high acceptance rate to find suitable programs with greater chances for acceptance.

For advanced clinical or counseling careers, online doctoral programs are growing in popularity. Those wanting to become licensed psychologists may consider psyd online programs offering both academic excellence and distance learning options.

If you’re interested in marriage and family therapy, selecting the best online mft programs can help you complete your studies efficiently while preparing for licensure and careers in mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin H. Kim

Recently Published Articles