World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4234
World Ranking
9630
National Ranking
89

Trond Nordfjærn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trond Nordfjærn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Trond Nordfjærn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trond Nordfjærn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education

Overview

Trond Nordfjærn is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. The research focuses on interdisciplinary areas bridging psychology, engineering, and social sciences with an emphasis on transportation and safety.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Engineering
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their work extends to several subfields such as:

  • Transportation
  • General Health Professions
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Social Psychology
  • Automotive Engineering

The research topics addressed cover a range of issues primarily related to urban and transport systems, including:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety

Recent published papers illustrate these thematic areas clearly:

  • A systematic review of the agent-based modelling/simulation paradigm in mobility transition, 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Active travel as a pro-environmental behaviour: An integrated framework, 2020, Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
  • Structural equation modelling of potential risk factors for pedestrian accidents in rural and urban roads, 2020, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
  • Demand for mitigating the risk of COVID-19 infection in public transport: The role of social trust and fatalistic beliefs, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Estimating financial compensation and minimum guaranteed charge for vehicle-to-grid technology, 2023, Energy Policy

The venues where this research is frequently published also indicate a focus on traffic psychology, injury prevention, and transportation studies:

  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
  • Travel Behaviour and Society
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention

Collaborations are a significant aspect of this scientist's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Milad Mehdizadeh
  • Mohsen Fallah Zavareh
  • Christian A. Klöckner
  • Dagny Adriaenssen Johannessen
  • Amy Østertun Geirdal

Recognition includes membership in the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, highlighting contributions in psychology and education.

Best Publications

  • The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas

    Hans Brende Lind;Trond Nordfjærn;Stig Halvard Jørgensen;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public

    Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Trond Nordfjærn;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • Relapse after inpatient substance use treatment: A prospective cohort study among users of illicit substances

    Helle Wessel Andersson;Merethe Wenaas;Trond Nordfjærn

  • A cross‐cultural comparison of road traffic risk perceptions, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour

    Trond Nordfjærn;Stig Jørgensen;Torbjorn Rundmo

  • The role of risk perception and other risk-related judgements in transportation mode use

    Torbjørn Rundmo;Trond Nordfjærn;Hilde Hestad Iversen;Sigve Oltedal

  • Perceptions of traffic risk in an industrialised and a developing country

    Trond Nordfjærn;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • The role of deliberate planning, car habit and resistance to change in public transportation mode use

    Trond Nordfjærn;Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • Risk perceptions, fatalism and driver behaviors in Turkey and Iran

    Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Trond Nordfjærn;Mohsen Fallah Zavareh;Amin Mohamadi Hezaveh

  • Co-occurrence between mental distress and poly-drug use: a ten year prospective study of patients from substance abuse treatment.

    Jasmina Burdzovic Andreas;Grethe Lauritzen;Trond Nordfjærn

  • An investigation of driver attitudes and behaviour in rural and urban areas in Norway.

    Trond Nordfjærn;Stig Halvard Jørgensen;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • Culture related to road traffic safety: a comparison of eight countries using two conceptualizations of culture.

    Trond Nordfjærn;Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Torbjorn Rundmo

  • Treatment and recovery as perceived by patients with substance addiction

    T Nordfjaern;T Rundmo;R Hole

  • The role of cultural factors and attitudes for pedestrian behaviour in an urban Turkish sample

    Trond Nordfjærn;Özlem Şimşekoğlu

  • Traffic risk perception, road safety attitudes, and behaviors among road users: a comparison of Turkey and Norway

    Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Trond Nordfjærn;Torbjørn Rundmo

  • Predictors of Dropout From Inpatient Substance Use Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    Helle Wessel Andersson;Aslak Steinsbekk;Espen Walderhaug;Eli Otterholt

  • Errors and violations in relation to bicyclists’ crash risks: Development of the Bicycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (BRBQ)

    Amin Mohamadi Hezaveh;Mohsen Fallah Zavareh;Christopher R. Cherry;Trond Nordfjærn

  • Driver behaviour and crash involvement among professional taxi and truck drivers: Light passenger cars versus heavy goods vehicles

    Milad Mehdizadeh;Afshin Shariat-Mohaymany;Trond Nordfjaern

  • Accident involvement among Iranian lorry drivers: Direct and indirect effects of background variables and aberrant driving behaviour

    Milad Mehdizadeh;Afshin Shariat-Mohaymany;Trond Nordfjaern

  • Walking time to school, children's active school travel and their related factors

    Milad Mehdizadeh;Milad Mehdizadeh;AmirReza Mamdoohi;Trond Nordfjaern

  • The role of socio-economic, built environment and psychological factors in parental mode choice for their children in an Iranian setting

    Milad Mehdizadeh;Trond Nordfjaern;AmirReza Mamdoohi

  • Religiosity and Alcohol Use: Is Religiosity Important for Abstention and Consumption Levels in the Second Half of Life?

    Trond Nordfjærn

  • Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters.

    Trond Nordfjærn;Özlem Şimşekoğlu;Hans Brende Lind;Stig Halvard Jørgensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ottar Bjerkeset
Ottar Bjerkeset Nord University
Meaghan O'Donnell
Meaghan O'Donnell University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a diverse range of online degree and career pathways, especially within counseling and mental health services. Aspiring professionals can pursue undergraduate and graduate degrees online, which offer flexible learning options that fit different lifestyles and schedules.

Key issues to consider include state-specific licensure and certification requirements. For example, the process of how to become a substance abuse counselor in Santa Ana often involves accredited coursework, supervised training, and passing exams. Similarly, understanding Scottsdale substance abuse counselors education requirements can help guide your academic decisions and ensure you meet local standards.

Location matters, as requirements differ. For those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Seattle, or wishing to know Spokane substance abuse counselor certification requirements, researching local regulations is crucial.

Ultimately, an online psychology degree can be the first step toward rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, research, and more—provided you understand the educational and legal steps required in your chosen specialty and location.

Best Scientists Citing Trond Nordfjærn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles