World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6611
World Ranking
10654
National Ranking
4457

Michael M. Wagner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Wagner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 114 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael M. Wagner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Wagner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Wagner is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary areas primarily bridging computer science and medicine, with a focus on epidemiology, information systems, and data-driven approaches to disease surveillance.

Their work encompasses several subfields of study, including Epidemiology, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems, and Modeling and Simulation. The main topics covered in their research include Scientific Computing and Data Management, Research Data Management Practices, Data-Driven Disease Surveillance, Influenza Virus Research Studies, COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies, Network Security and Intrusion Detection, and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Michael M. Wagner include the following:

  • "Towards Machine-FAIR: Representing software and datasets to facilitate reuse and scientific discovery by machines," 2024, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "SGLT2 Inhibitors in Perioperative Care-Continue or Hold?", 2025, JAMA Surgery
  • "Creating a Discipline-specific Commons for Infectious Disease Epidemiology," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Other papers associated with related collaborations include:

  • "A Bayesian approach for detecting a disease that is not being modeled," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Developing a radiation field-based monitoring system for the transport and storage cask inventory during extended interim storage," 2021, Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal

Frequent co-authors working with Michael M. Wagner include William R. Hogan, John Levander, John M. Aronis, Jeffrey P. Ferraro, and Per H. Gesteland. These collaborations often intersect areas of epidemiology, medical informatics, and computational research.

Publication venues in which Wagner's work frequently appears include PLoS ONE, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal, JAMA Surgery, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • Implementing Syndromic Surveillance: A Practical Guide Informed by the Early Experience

    Kenneth D. Mandl;J. Marc Overhage;Michael M. Wagner;William B. Lober

  • Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records

    William R. Hogan;Michael M. Wagner

  • The emerging science of very early detection of disease outbreaks.

    Michael M. Wagner;Fu-Chiang Tsui;Jeremy U. Espino;Virginia M. Dato

  • Technical description of RODS: a real-time public health surveillance system

    Fu Chiang Tsui;Jeremy U. Espino;Virginia M. Dato;Per H. Gesteland

  • Bayesian network anomaly pattern detection for disease outbreaks

    Weng-Keen Wong;Andrew Moore;Gregory Cooper;Michael Wagner

  • System and method for notifying users about information or events of an enterprise

    Michael M. Wagner

  • Handbook of biosurveillance

    Michael M. Wagner;Andrew W. Moore;Ron M. Aryel

  • Classifying free-text triage chief complaints into syndromic categories with natural languages processing

    Wendy W. Chapman;Lee M. Christensen;Michael M. Wagner;Peter J. Haug

  • Roundtable on bioterrorism detection: information system-based surveillance.

    William B. Lober;Bryant Thomas Karras;Michael M. Wagner;J. Marc Overhage

  • Value of ICD-9-Coded Chief Complaints for Detection of Epidemics.

    Fu-Chiang Tsui;Michael M. Wagner;Virginia M. Dato;Chung-Chou Ho Chang

  • Rule-based anomaly pattern detection for detecting disease outbreaks

    Weng-Keen Wong;Andrew Moore;Gregory Cooper;Michael Wagner

  • The Accuracy of Medication Data in an Outpatient Electronic Medical Record

    Michael M. Wagner;William R. Hogan

  • Automated syndromic surveillance for the 2002 Winter Olympics.

    Per H. Gesteland;Reed M. Gardner;Fu-Chiang Tsui;Jeremy U. Espino

  • Analysis of Web access logs for surveillance of influenza.

    Heather A. Johnson;Michael M. Wagner;William R. Hogan;Wendy W. Chapman

  • Detection of pediatric respiratory and diarrheal outbreaks from sales of over-the-counter electrolyte products.

    William R. Hogan;Fu-Chiang Tsui;Oleg Ivanov;Per H. Gesteland

  • The Informatics Response in Disaster, Terrorism, and War

    Jonathan M. Teich;Michael M. Wagner;Colin F. Mackenzie;Klaus O. Schafer

  • Accuracy of ICD-9-coded chief complaints and diagnoses for the detection of acute respiratory illness.

    Jeremy U. Espino;Michael M. Wagner

  • Classification of Emergency Department Chief Complaints Into 7 Syndromes: A Retrospective Analysis of 527,228 Patients

    Wendy W. Chapman;John N. Dowling;Michael M. Wagner

  • Design of a national retail data monitor for public health surveillance.

    Michael M. Wagner;J. Michael Robinson;Fu-Chiang Tsui;Jeremy U. Espino

  • WSARE: What's Strange About Recent Events?

    Weng-Keen Wong;Andrew Moore;Gregory Cooper;Michael Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory F. Cooper
Gregory F. Cooper University of Pittsburgh
Wendy W. Chapman
Wendy W. Chapman University of Melbourne
Peter J. Haug
Peter J. Haug University of Utah
Weng-Keen Wong
Weng-Keen Wong Oregon State University
Andrew W. Moore
Andrew W. Moore Carnegie Mellon University
Lee H. Harrison
Lee H. Harrison University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth D. Mandl
Kenneth D. Mandl Harvard Medical School
Qi Li
Qi Li Shanghai University
Richard K. Zimmerman
Richard K. Zimmerman University of Pittsburgh
Thomas E. Wittum
Thomas E. Wittum The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to various online study options and career pathways. Many students look to online schools for flexible and accredited degree programs that fit their schedule and budget. These institutions often provide the same rigorous curriculum as on-campus programs, with the benefit of remote learning.

Students interested in niche fields may pursue specialized degrees tailored for the digital world. For aspiring game developers, the best online game design degree programs offer a mix of creative and technical skills that align with industry needs. Those focused on protecting data and digital assets should consider accredited and affordable cyber security degrees to prepare for high-demand roles.

Computer science expertise is also valuable beyond traditional tech fields. For example, professionals with a knack for tech-driven project management may be interested in construction degrees that combine engineering with management and digital tools.

Online degrees can offer specialized pathways and greater flexibility, helping students align their education with career goals in today’s evolving digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles