World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7799 7276 4191 3810 157 8792

Leora R. Cherney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leora R. Cherney between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leora R. Cherney published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 20 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications
1986 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leora R. Cherney: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 2
1998 4
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 7
2007 10
2008 7
2009 4
2010 9
2011 7
2012 6
2013 8
2014 8
2015 5
2016 11
2017 0
2018 9
2019 8
2020 9
2021 15
2022 17
2023 4
2024 8
2025 12
Total 198
Download as CSV

Leora R. Cherney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leora R. Cherney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 157
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Leora R. Cherney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leora R. Cherney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leora R. Cherney is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, rehabilitation, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and speech and hearing.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics around the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, dysphagia assessment and management, tracheal and airway disorders, voice and speech disorders, assistive technology in communication and mobility, and dementia and cognitive impairment research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Leora R. Cherney include Sameer Ashaie, Allen W. Heinemann, Anne Deutsch, Julia Carpenter, and Facrm Bethesda.

Their publications often appear in recognized venues with multiple contributions in certain journals. The venues with frequent publications are:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Aphasiology
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Demystifying the Complexity of Aphasia Treatment: Application of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification Systemx," 2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Advanced Machine Learning Tools to Monitor Biomarkers of Dysphagia: A Wearable Sensor Proof-of-Concept Study," 2021, Digital Biomarkers
  • "Web-based Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (Web ORLA®): A pilot randomized control trial," 2021, Clinical Rehabilitation
  • "Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting," 2022, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • "Developments in the application of Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs: an international survey of practice," 2021, Disability and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Carolee J. Winstein;Joel Stein;Ross Arena;Barbara Bates

  • Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review.

    Nina Simmons-Mackie;Anastasia Raymer;Elizabeth Armstrong;Audrey Holland

  • Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.

    Leora R. Cherney;Janet P. Patterson;Anastasia Raymer;Tobi Frymark

  • Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review.

    Nina Simmons-Mackie;Anastasia Raymer;Leora R. Cherney;Leora R. Cherney

  • Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: Relationship with unilateral neglect

    Leora R. Cherney;Anita S. Halper;Christina M. Kwasnica;Richard L. Harvey

  • Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results.

    Leora R. Cherney;Anita S. Halper;Audrey L. Holland;Ron Cole

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • Aphasia, Alexia, and Oral Reading

    Leora Reiff Cherney

  • Telerehabilitation, virtual therapists, and acquired neurologic speech and language disorders.

    Leora R. Cherney;Leora R. Cherney;Sarel van Vuuren;Sarel van Vuuren

  • Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): Evaluating the Efficacy of Computer-Delivered Therapy in Chronic Nonfluent Aphasia

    Leora R Cherney

  • Intensity of Aphasia Therapy: Evidence and Efficacy

    Leora R. Cherney;Janet P. Patterson;Anastasia M. Raymer

  • Psychometric properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 2

    Edna M. Babbitt;Allen W. Heinemann;Patrick Semik;Leora R. Cherney

  • Aphasia treatment: Intensity, dose parameters, and script training

    Leora R. Cherney

  • Conversational script performance in adults with non‐fluent aphasia: Treatment intensity and aphasia severity

    Jaime B. Lee;Rosalind C. Kaye;Leora R. Cherney

  • Patient-reported changes in communication after computer-based script training for aphasia.

    Larry M. Manheim;Anita S Halper;Anita S Halper;Leora R Cherney;Leora R Cherney

  • IMITATE: An intensive computer-based treatment for aphasia based on action observation and imitation

    Jaime Lee;Robert Fowler;Daniel Rodney;Leora R Cherney

  • Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: an international survey of practice

    Miranda L. Rose;Leora R. Cherney;Linda E. Worrall

  • Efficacy of oral reading in aphasia treatment outcome.

    Cherney Lr;Merbitz Ct;Grip Jc

  • Communication confidence in persons with aphasia.

    Edna M Babbitt;Leora R Cherney

  • Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 1

    Leora R. Cherney;Edna M. Babbitt;Patrick Semik;Allen W. Heinemann

  • Unilateral visual neglect in right-hemisphere stroke: a longitudinal study

    Leora R. Cherney;Anita S. Halper

  • Task-dependent changes in brain activation following therapy for nonfluent aphasia: discussion of two individual cases.

    Leora R. Cherney;Steven L. Small

Frequent Co-Authors

Anastasia M. Raymer
Anastasia M. Raymer Old Dominion University
Linda Worrall
Linda Worrall University of Queensland
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona
Nina Simmons-Mackie
Nina Simmons-Mackie Southeastern Louisiana University
Steven L. Small
Steven L. Small The University of Texas at Dallas
Allen W. Heinemann
Allen W. Heinemann Northwestern University
Swathi Kiran
Swathi Kiran Boston University
Todd B. Parrish
Todd B. Parrish Northwestern University
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
John A. Rogers
John A. Rogers Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens numerous career possibilities, especially via online programs that accommodate a variety of schedules. Many graduates go on to become counselors or therapists, often specializing in areas like marriage and family therapy. However, requirements can vary by location, so it is essential to understand the specific processes for your desired region.

For example, mft requirements in Lexington differ from those in other cities, reflecting unique state regulations. If you want to know more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Lincoln, it's important to follow the local licensure steps, which typically include a master's degree, clinical experience, and passing examination.

Similarly, aspiring professionals can learn how to become an mft in Long Beach or review Los Angeles mft certification requirements to ensure they meet all regional standards. Researching these pathways can help you tailor your education and certification plans, making the journey from online degree to rewarding career smoother.

Best Scientists Citing Leora R. Cherney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles