World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
4995
World Ranking
9254
National Ranking
4900

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5022
World Ranking
8828
National Ranking
3733

Anastasia M. Raymer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia M. Raymer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anastasia M. Raymer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia M. Raymer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anastasia M. Raymer is affiliated with Old Dominion University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, and Rehabilitation.

The research topics addressed by Anastasia M. Raymer cover areas such as Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare, Dysphagia Assessment and Management, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Reading and Literacy Development, Language Development and Disorders, and Second Language Acquisition and Learning.

Recent publications by Anastasia M. Raymer include:

  • Word Retrieval Treatments in Aphasia: A Survey of Professional Practice, 2022, Aphasiology
  • Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Aphasia: Evidence From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, 2023, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Other notable papers related to their research area, authored by frequent collaborators, include:

  • Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Quality Appraisal of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, 2020, Reading & Writing Quarterly
  • Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review, 2022, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Cognitive Assessments for Patients With Neurological Conditions: A Preliminary Survey of Speech-Language Pathology Practice Patterns, 2021, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Anastasia M. Raymer has published frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
  • Reading & Writing Quarterly
  • Aphasiology

Collaborative research is a significant aspect of their career, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Jane Roitsch
  • Alisha P. Springle
  • Rachel K. Johnson
  • Michelle Armour
  • Christina M. del Toro

Best Publications

  • Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review.

    Nina Simmons-Mackie;Anastasia Raymer;Elizabeth Armstrong;Audrey Holland

  • Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.

    Leora R. Cherney;Janet P. Patterson;Anastasia Raymer;Tobi Frymark

  • Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review.

    Nina Simmons-Mackie;Anastasia Raymer;Leora R. Cherney;Leora R. Cherney

  • Functional MRI of language in aphasia: a review of the literature and the methodological challenges.

    Bruce Crosson;Keith McGregor;Kaundinya S. Gopinath;Tim W. Conway;Tim W. Conway

  • Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Pelagie Beeson;Audrey Holland;Diane Kendall

  • Cognitive neuropsychological analysis and neuroanatomic correlates in a case of acute anomia

    A.M. Raymer;A.L. Foundas;L.M. Maher;M.L. Greenwald

  • Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalization analysis

    A. M. Raymer;C. K. Thompson;B. Jacobs;H. R. Le Grand

  • Ecological implications of limb apraxia: Evidence from mealtime behavior

    Anne L. Foundas;Beth L. Macauley;Anastasia M. Raymer;Lynn M. Maher

  • Intensity of Aphasia Therapy: Evidence and Efficacy

    Leora R. Cherney;Janet P. Patterson;Anastasia M. Raymer

  • Category-specific naming deficits for objects and actions: semantic attribute and grammatical role hypotheses

    Lisa H Lu;Bruce Crosson;Bruce Crosson;Stephen E Nadeau;Kenneth M Heilman;Kenneth M Heilman

  • Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Floris Singletary;Amy Rodriguez;Maribel Ciampitti

  • Response to contrasting verb retrieval treatments: A case study

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Tina A. Ellsworth

  • Computerised training for impairments of word comprehension and retrieval in aphasia

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Francine P. Kohen;Diane Saffell

  • Management of anomia.

    Lynn M. Maher;Anastasia M. Raymer

  • A systematic review of gesture treatments for post-stroke aphasia

    Miranda L. Rose;Anastasia M. Raymer;Lucie E. Lanyon;Michelle C. Attard

  • Category-specific naming deficit for medical terms after dominant thalamic/capsular hemorrhage.

    Bruce Crosson;Paul J. Moberg;James R. Boone;Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi;Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi

  • Crossed apraxia: implications for handedness.

    A.M. Raymer;A.S. Merians;J.C. Adair;R.L. Schwartz

  • Semantic-phonologic treatment for noun and verb retrieval impairments in aphasia.

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Maribel Ciampitti;Beth Holliway;Floris Singletary

  • Effects of gesture+verbal and semantic‐phonologic treatments for verb retrieval in aphasia

    Amy D. Rodriguez;Anastasia M. Raymer;Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi

  • Neuroplasticity and aphasia treatments: new approaches for an old problem.

    Bruce Crosson;Amy D Rodriguez;David Copland;Julius Fridriksson

  • Lexical–semantic deficits in two patients with dominant thalamic infarction

    A.M Raymer;P Moberg;B Crosson;S Nadeau;S Nadeau

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth M. Heilman
Kenneth M. Heilman University of Florida
Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi
Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi University of Florida
Bruce Crosson
Bruce Crosson Emory University
Leora R. Cherney
Leora R. Cherney Northwestern University
Nina Simmons-Mackie
Nina Simmons-Mackie Southeastern Louisiana University
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Stephen E. Nadeau
Stephen E. Nadeau University of Florida
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Katerina Hilari
Katerina Hilari City, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience offers a wide range of academic and professional avenues beyond traditional research or medical roles. Many students explore related fields such as psychology, social work, and counseling, which are increasingly accessible through flexible online degree programs.

When considering alternative or supplementary degrees, affordability is often a key concern. Students can compare how much is a psychology degree at different schools, which can help inform the best financial choices for advancing their education.

For those interested in working with diverse communities, pursuing one of the msw online programs can open the door to careers in social work. Students aiming for clinical practice and counseling might consider the cheapest psyd programs or the best online mft programs for a cost-effective and streamlined educational path.

Exploring these related online degrees can help neuroscience students and graduates expand their expertise and enhance their career prospects across growing fields in mental health, counseling, and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasia M. Raymer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles