World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7550 7041 4066 3694 92 7356
Neuroscience 43 7385 6810 3186 2877 107 7495

Maya L. Henry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maya L. Henry between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maya L. Henry published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2023. 18 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2023. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maya L. Henry: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 6
2011 3
2012 8
2013 11
2014 9
2015 0
2016 10
2017 2
2018 9
2019 11
2020 7
2021 11
2022 8
2023 14
2024 13
2025 5
Total 135
Download as CSV

Maya L. Henry publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maya L. Henry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 107
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Maya L. Henry D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maya L. Henry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Maya L. Henry is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental Health. Their scholarly work includes contributions to General Health Professions, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered in Maya L. Henry's research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Cortex
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain
  • Brain Sciences

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Maya L. Henry are:

  • "Principles and philosophies for speech and language therapists working with people with primary progressive aphasia: an international expert consensus," 2022, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • "Behavioral Treatment for Speech and Language in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech: A Systematic Review," 2023, Neuropsychology Review
  • "Cortical Tracking of the Speech Envelope in Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia," 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia: Practical Recommendations for Treatment from 20 Years of Behavioural Research," 2021, Brain Sciences
  • "Automated Detection of Speech Timing Alterations in Autopsy-Confirmed Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia," 2022, Neurology

Maya L. Henry has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
  • Stephanie M. Grasso
  • Bruce L. Miller
  • Maria Luisa Mandelli
  • Heather Dial

Best Publications

  • Seizures and Epileptiform Activity in the Early Stages of Alzheimer Disease

    Keith A. Vossel;Alexander J. Beagle;Gil D. Rabinovici;Huidy Shu;Huidy Shu

  • Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

    Stephen M. Wilson;Maya L. Henry;Max Besbris;Jennifer M. Ogar

  • Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants.

    Edoardo G. Spinelli;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Zachary A. Miller;Miguel A Santos-Santos

  • White matter damage in primary progressive aphasias: a diffusion tensor tractography study

    Sebastiano Galantucci;Maria Carmela Tartaglia;Stephen M. Wilson;Stephen M. Wilson;Maya L. Henry

  • Syntactic processing depends on dorsal language tracts

    Stephen M. Wilson;Sebastiano Galantucci;Maria Carmela Tartaglia;Kindle Rising

  • Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates.

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Pélagie M. Beeson;Maya L. Henry;Anne Leyden

  • The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

    Maya L Henry;Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini

  • Anterior temporal lobe degeneration produces widespread network-driven dysfunction

    Christine C. Guo;Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini;Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini;Benno Gesierich;Benno Gesierich;Maya Henry

  • Neural Correlates of Syntactic Processing in the Nonfluent Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Stephen M. Wilson;Nina F. Dronkers;Nina F. Dronkers;Jennifer M. Ogar;Jung Jang

  • Frontal White Matter Tracts Sustaining Speech Production in Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Maria Luisa Mandelli;Eduardo Caverzasi;Richard J. Binney;Maya L. Henry

  • Handedness and language learning disability differentially distribute in progressive aphasia variants

    Zachary A. Miller;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Katherine P. Rankin;Maya L. Henry

  • Healthy brain connectivity predicts atrophy progression in non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia.

    Maria Luisa Mandelli;Eduard Vilaplana;Jesse A. Brown;H. Isabel Hubbard

  • Positive Effects of Language Treatment for the Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Rachel M. King;Borna Bonakdarpour;Maya L. Henry

  • Features of Patients With Nonfluent/Agrammatic Primary Progressive Aphasia With Underlying Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Pathology or Corticobasal Degeneration

    Miguel A. Santos-Santos;Miguel A. Santos-Santos;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Richard J. Binney;Jennifer Ogar

  • Patterns of longitudinal brain atrophy in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

    Jonathan D. Rohrer;Francesca Caso;Colin Mahoney;Maya Henry

  • Do Dual-Route Models Accurately Predict Reading and Spelling Performance in Individuals with Acquired Alexia and Agraphia?

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Maya L. Henry;Sommer L. Teague;Susan D. Carnahan

  • The role of left perisylvian cortical regions in spelling.

    Maya L. Henry;Pélagie M. Beeson;Amy J. Stark;Steven Z. Rapcsak

  • Examining the value of lexical retrieval treatment in primary progressive aphasia: two positive cases.

    Maya L Henry;K. Rising;A. T. DeMarco;B. L. Miller

  • Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia

    Maya L Henry;H Isabel Hubbard;H Isabel Hubbard;Stephanie M Grasso;Maria Luisa Mandelli

  • Comprehension and production of written words

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Maya L. Henry

  • What role does the anterior temporal lobe play in sentence-level processing? neural correlates of syntactic processing in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia

    Stephen M. Wilson;Andrew T. DeMarco;Maya L. Henry;Benno Gesierich

  • Speech and language therapy approaches to managing primary progressive aphasia

    Anna Volkmer;Emily Rogalski;Maya Henry;Cathleen Taylor-Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini University of California, San Francisco
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Stephen M. Wilson
Stephen M. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Maria Luisa Mandelli
Maria Luisa Mandelli University of California, San Francisco
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco
William W. Seeley
William W. Seeley University of California, San Francisco
Pélagie M. Beeson
Pélagie M. Beeson University of Arizona
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Jennifer M. Ogar
Jennifer M. Ogar University of California, San Francisco
Howard J. Rosen
Howard J. Rosen University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience but want flexibility, consider enrolling in accelerated programs online. These programs offer a faster path to your degree, helping you enter the workforce or graduate school quickly. Many students also seek out the best bachelor degrees to get for future financial security, and Neuroscience is increasingly recognized for its diverse career potential.

When mapping your career, it’s worthwhile to explore fields connected to highest paid college majors. Neurobiology, psychology, computer science, and biomedical engineering are all areas that intersect with Neuroscience, opening doors to lucrative job opportunities in research, healthcare, and technology.

Cost is always a factor, but many cheapest online college options that accept FAFSA make it easier to earn your degree without overwhelming debt. Choosing the right program can lead to both academic success and a rewarding, high-paying career in Neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Maya L. Henry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles