World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5082
World Ranking
8603
National Ranking
3658

Maria Luisa Mandelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Luisa Mandelli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maria Luisa Mandelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Luisa Mandelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Luisa Mandelli is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans Neuroscience and Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Neurology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Maria Luisa Mandelli's recent publications reflect their engagement with neurodegenerative diseases and language disorders. Notable papers include:

  • "Right temporal degeneration and socioemotional semantics: semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia", 2022, Brain
  • "Network structure and transcriptomic vulnerability shape atrophy in frontotemporal dementia", 2022, Brain
  • "Regional and hemispheric susceptibility of the temporal lobe to FTLD-TDP type C pathology", 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Speech production differences in English and Italian speakers with nonfluent variant PPA", 2020, Neurology
  • "Automated Detection of Speech Timing Alterations in Autopsy-Confirmed Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia", 2022, Neurology

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Maria Luisa Mandelli include:

  • Bruce L. Miller
  • Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
  • Zachary Miller
  • William W. Seeley
  • Howard J. Rosen

The scientist has contributed extensively to multiple publication venues. The most frequent of these are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Neurology
  • Brain
  • Cortex

The scope of Maria Luisa Mandelli's work integrates cognitive neuroscience and clinical neurology, emphasizing neurodegenerative conditions such as frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia. Their research examines brain connectivity, language production differences across languages, and the pathological mechanisms underlying dementia syndromes, employing advanced neuroimaging and transcriptomic methods.

Best Publications

  • Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants.

    Edoardo G. Spinelli;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Zachary A. Miller;Miguel A Santos-Santos

  • Neural Stem Cell Engraftment and Myelination in the Human Brain

    Nalin Gupta;Roland G. Henry;Jonathan Strober;Sang-Mo Kang

  • Frontal White Matter Tracts Sustaining Speech Production in Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Maria Luisa Mandelli;Eduardo Caverzasi;Richard J. Binney;Maya L. Henry

  • Network degeneration and dysfunction in presymptomatic C9ORF72 expansion carriers

    Suzee E. Lee;Ana C. Sias;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Jesse A. Brown

  • Plasma 24S-hydroxycholesterol and caudate MRI in pre-manifest and early Huntington's disease

    Valerio Leoni;Caterina Mariotti;Sarah J. Tabrizi;Marta Valenza

  • Right temporal lobe and socioemotional semantics: semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.

    Unknown

  • Handedness and language learning disability differentially distribute in progressive aphasia variants

    Zachary A. Miller;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Katherine P. Rankin;Maya L. Henry

  • Healthy brain connectivity predicts atrophy progression in non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia.

    Maria Luisa Mandelli;Eduard Vilaplana;Jesse A. Brown;H. Isabel Hubbard

  • Functional Connectivity during Resting-State Functional MR Imaging: Study of the Correspondence between Independent Component Analysis and Region-of-Interest−Based Methods

    C Rosazza;Ludovico Minati;F Ghielmetti;M L Mandelli

  • Features of Patients With Nonfluent/Agrammatic Primary Progressive Aphasia With Underlying Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Pathology or Corticobasal Degeneration

    Miguel A. Santos-Santos;Miguel A. Santos-Santos;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Richard J. Binney;Jennifer Ogar

  • Quantifying diffusion MRI tractography of the corticospinal tract in brain tumors with deterministic and probabilistic methods

    Monica Bucci;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Jeffrey I. Berman;Bagrat Amirbekian

  • Focal temporal pole atrophy and network degeneration in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

    Jessica A. Collins;Victor Montal;Daisy Hochberg;Megan Quimby

  • Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia

    Maya L Henry;H Isabel Hubbard;H Isabel Hubbard;Stephanie M Grasso;Maria Luisa Mandelli

  • What role does the anterior temporal lobe play in sentence-level processing? neural correlates of syntactic processing in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia

    Stephen M. Wilson;Andrew T. DeMarco;Maya L. Henry;Benno Gesierich

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Shows Different Topographic Involvement of the Thalamus in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration

    Alessandra Erbetta;M. L. Mandelli;M. Savoiardo;M. Grisoli

  • Phonological processing in primary progressive aphasia

    Maya L. Henry;Stephen M. Wilson;Miranda C. Babiak;Maria Luisa Mandelli

  • Reading words and other people: A comparison of exception word, familiar face and affect processing in the left and right temporal variants of primary progressive aphasia.

    Richard J. Binney;Maya L. Henry;Miranda Babiak;Peter S. Pressman

  • Rates of Amyloid Imaging Positivity in Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Miguel A. Santos-Santos;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici;Leonardo Iaccarino;Leonardo Iaccarino;Nagehan Ayakta;Nagehan Ayakta

  • Quantifying accuracy and precision of diffusion MR tractography of the corticospinal tract in brain tumors

    Maria Luisa Mandelli;Mitchel S Berger;Monica Bucci;Jeffrey I Berman

  • Pain processing in medication overuse headache: a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.

    Stefania Ferraro;Licia Grazzi;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Domenico Aquino

  • White matter involvement in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

    Eduardo Caverzasi;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Stephen J. DeArmond;Christopher P. Hess

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini University of California, San Francisco
Maya L. Henry
Maya L. Henry The University of Texas at Austin
William W. Seeley
William W. Seeley University of California, San Francisco
Roland G. Henry
Roland G. Henry University of California, San Francisco
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco
Howard J. Rosen
Howard J. Rosen University of California, San Francisco
Lea T. Grinberg
Lea T. Grinberg University of California, San Francisco
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Stephen M. Wilson
Stephen M. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a wide range of career opportunities in health, research, and counseling fields. Many students interested in the brain and behavior often explore related online degrees for greater flexibility and specialization. For example, earning an lmft degree online helps prepare graduates for licensure as a marriage and family therapist—a profession with growing demand.

Interested in a broader psychology focus? Numerous accredited masters programs in psychology offer convenient online formats, making it possible to advance your expertise while balancing other commitments. Even those starting out can study psychology online at the undergraduate level, laying a strong foundation for diverse careers in mental health, education, and research.

Many neuroscience graduates are also drawn to social work, where they can support and advocate for individuals in need. If that appeals to you, consider enrolling in one of the masters in social work programs offered online. Whichever path you choose, online degrees provide flexible options to help you reach your goals in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Luisa Mandelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles