World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
6964
World Ranking
7399
National Ranking
141

Ulf Sonesson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Sonesson sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Ulf Sonesson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Sonesson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulf Sonesson is affiliated with the RISE Research Institutes of Sweden in Sweden. Their research work spans environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a focus on sustainability and environmental impact in agricultural systems.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Key subfields of their research are:

  • Ecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Small Animals
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Food Science

Ulf Sonesson's work covers several central topics such as:

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

The research has been published in various venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Sustainability
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Scientific Reports
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Representative recent papers include:

  • "Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature," 2020, Sustainability
  • "Changes in dietary carbon footprint over ten years relative to individual characteristics and food intake in the Västerbotten Intervention Programme," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Dietary climate impact: Contribution of foods and dietary patterns by gender and age in a Swedish population," 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Systematic Evaluation of Nutrition Indicators for Use within Food LCA Studies," 2020, Sustainability
  • "Dietary environmental impacts relative to planetary boundaries for six environmental indicators - A population-based study," 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Elinor Hallström
  • Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist
  • Helena Hansson
  • Stefan Gunnarsson
  • Anna Strid

Best Publications

  • The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges

    Bruno Notarnicola;Serenella Sala;Assumpció Anton;Sarah J. McLaren

  • Not All Salmon Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers;Ulf Sonesson;Astrid Scholz

  • The methodology of the FAO study: Global Food Losses and Food Waste - extent, causes and prevention”- FAO, 2011

    J. Gustafsson;C. Cederberg;U. Sonesson;A. Emanuelsson

  • A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy

    Nathalie Gontard;Ulf Sonesson;Morten Birkved;Mauro Majone

  • In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption

    Serenella Sala;Assumpcio’ Anton;Sarah J. McLaren;Bruno Notarnicola

  • How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture

    David K. Bryngelsson;Stefan Wirsenius;Fredrik Hedenus;Ulf Sonesson

  • Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

    Nathan L. Pelletier;Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Sarah A. Kruse

  • FORMATION AND EMISSION OF N2O AND CH4 FROM COMPOST HEAPS OF ORGANIC HOUSEHOLD WASTE

    B. Beck-Friis;M. Pell;U. Sonesson;H. Jönsson

  • Environmental and economic analysis of management systems for biodegradable waste

    U. Sonesson;Anna Björklund;M. Carlsson;M. Dalemo

  • Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: Case studies in Spain and Sweden

    Jennifer Davis;Ulf Sonesson;Daniel U. Baumgartner;Thomas Nemecek

  • ORWARE – A simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Part 1: Model description

    Magnus Dalemo;U. Sonesson;A. Bjorklund;K. Mingarini

  • Eco-labelling of wild-caught seafood products

    Mikkel Thrane;Friederike Ziegler;Ulf Sonesson

  • Co-Product Allocation in Life Cycle Assessments of Seafood Production Systems: Review of Problems and Strategies

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Nathan L. Pelletier;Ulf Sonesson

  • A review of methodological issues affecting LCA of novel food products.

    Almudena Hospido;Almudena Hospido;Jennifer Davis;Johanna Berlin;Ulf Sonesson

  • Protein quality as functional unit – A methodological framework for inclusion in life cycle assessment of food

    Ulf Sonesson;Jennifer Davis;Anna Flysjö;Jenny Gustavsson

  • Modelling of waste collection - a general approach to calculate fuel consumption and time

    Ulf Sonesson

  • Environmental impact of future milk supply chains in Sweden: a scenario study

    Ulf Sonesson;Johanna Berlin

  • Environmentally-friendly food processing.

    Berit Mattsson;Ulf Sonesson

  • Using dietary quality scores to assess sustainability of food products and human diets: a systematic review.

    Elinor Hallström;Jennifer Davis;Anna Woodhouse;Ulf Sonesson

  • Evaluating a municipal waste management plan using orware

    Anna Björklund;Anna Björklund;Magnus Dalemo;Ulf Sonesson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Tyedmers
Peter Tyedmers Dalhousie University
Almudena Hospido
Almudena Hospido University of Santiago de Compostela
Ingegerd Johansson
Ingegerd Johansson Umeå University
Assumpció Antón
Assumpció Antón Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology
Håkan Jönsson
Håkan Jönsson Lund University
Ingrid Öborn
Ingrid Öborn Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Serenella Sala
Serenella Sala European Commission Joint Research Centre
Alicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk Karolinska Institute
Göran Berndes
Göran Berndes Chalmers University of Technology
David Bolzonella
David Bolzonella University of Verona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals choose to enhance their qualifications through accredited eds to edd programs, which offer specialized knowledge in leadership, research, and applied sciences.

Social work intersects with environmental issues, particularly in community resilience and sustainability. Pursuing one of the cheapest online dsw programs can provide environmental professionals with skills to support vulnerable populations affected by environmental changes.

Those seeking flexible, budget-friendly options might consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This approach allows students to tailor their coursework while gaining a broad academic foundation, which can be valuable for interdisciplinary environmental careers.

For beginners or career changers, selecting what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get could be a strategic starting point, providing a manageable path toward further specialization in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf Sonesson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles