World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
9330
World Ranking
9380
National Ranking
3362

Anastasia Romanou publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Romanou sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anastasia Romanou D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Romanou sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anastasia Romanou is affiliated with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in the United States and has a strong research focus in environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and oceanography, among others.

Their research covers key topics such as climate variability and models, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, marine and coastal ecosystems, and atmospheric chemistry and aerosols. Further subjects include geology and paleoclimatology research, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, and ocean acidification effects and responses.

Romanou has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers, with notable recent publications including:

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6, 2020, Current Climate Change Reports
  • CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850-2014) With GISS-E2.1, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • GISS Model E2.2: A Climate Model Optimized for the Middle Atmosphere-Model Structure, Climatology, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Future Climate Change Under SSP Emission Scenarios With GISS-E2.1, 2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Frequent collaborators in Romanou's work include Maxwell Kelley, Gavin A. Schmidt, Gary L. Russell, David Rind, and Paul Lerner.

Romanou's research is regularly published in several scientific journals, with multiple publications in the following venues:

  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Journal of Climate
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Earth System Dynamics
  • Surveys in Geophysics

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of climate forcings

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;L. Nazarenko

  • Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data

    Gavin A. Schmidt;Reto Ruedy;James E. Hansen;Igor Aleinov

  • Configuration and Assessment of the GISS ModelE2 Contributions to the CMIP5 Archive

    Gavin A. Schmidt;Max Kelley;Larissa Nazarenko;Reto Ruedy

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology.

    Maxwell Kelley;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;P. Kharecha

  • Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I

    Donald J. Wuebbles;David W. Fahey;Kathy A. Hibbard;Jeff R. Arnold

  • Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6.

    Roland Séférian;Sarah Berthet;Andrew Yool;Julien Palmiéri

  • Climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;P. Kharecha

  • Mechanisms of Microbial Carbon Sequestration in the Ocean - Future Research Directions

    N Jiao;C Robinson;F Azam;Hassan Thomas

  • The ocean’s role in the transient response of climate to abrupt greenhouse gas forcing

    John Marshall;Jeffery R. Scott;Kyle C. Armour;J.-M. Campin

  • Biogeochemical protocols and diagnostics for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

    James C. Orr;Raymond G. Najjar;Olivier Aumont;Laurent Bopp

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • The Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP) Contribution to CMIP6: Investigation of Sea-Level and Ocean Climate Change in Response to CO2 Forcing

    Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Nathaelle Bouttes;Stephen M. Griffies;Helmuth Haak

  • CMIP5 historical simulations (1850–2012) with GISS ModelE2

    Ron L. Miller;Ron L. Miller;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Nick Tausnev

  • Future climate change under RCP emission scenarios with GISS ModelE2

    L. Nazarenko;G. A. Schmidt;R. L. Miller;N. Tausnev

  • CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850–2014) With GISS‐E2.1

    Ron L. Miller;Ron L. Miller;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems

    Frank E. Muller‐Karger;Erin Hestir;Christiana Ade;Kevin Turpie

  • Evaporation–Precipitation Variability over the Mediterranean and the Black Seas from Satellite and Reanalysis Estimates

    A. Romanou;G. Tselioudis;C. S. Zerefos;C. A. Clayson

  • 20th century changes in surface solar irradiance in simulations and observations

    A. Romanou;B. Liepert;G. A. Schmidt;W. B. Rossow

  • Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment

    Roland Séférian;Marion Gehlen;Laurent Bopp;Laure Resplandy

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin A. Schmidt
Gavin A. Schmidt Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Ron L. Miller
Ron L. Miller Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University
David Rind
David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Gary L. Russell
Gary L. Russell Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Rainer Bleck
Rainer Bleck National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Reto Ruedy
Reto Ruedy Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Larissa Nazarenko
Larissa Nazarenko Goddard Institute for Space Studies
James Hansen
James Hansen Columbia University
Dorothy Koch
Dorothy Koch National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many programs focus on interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating aspects of social work, general studies, and geosciences to address environmental challenges effectively.

For example, some students may benefit from enrolling in the cheapest dsw program, which prepares professionals to advocate for communities impacted by environmental issues. Alternatively, those seeking a broader educational foundation might consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs, where they can tailor coursework to include environmental policy, sustainability, and natural resource management.

For students concerned with workload, researching the easiest bachelor degree to get can help identify programs that fit their learning style while still aligning with environmental career goals.

Finally, specialized study in earth sciences through geology degrees online equips students with technical skills crucial for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and resource exploration.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasia Romanou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles