What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Enrique Lara mostly deals with Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Biodiversity and Ribosomal RNA.
Enrique Lara interconnects Protist and Arcellinida in the investigation of issues within Ecology.
His research investigates the connection with Evolutionary biology and areas like Amoebozoa which intersect with concerns in Systematics.
As part of one scientific family, Enrique Lara deals mainly with the area of Phylogenetics, narrowing it down to issues related to the Phylogenetic tree, and often Zoology, Facultative, Genomic information and Genome.
His Biodiversity study incorporates themes from Soil quality, Biofertilizer, Nutrient and Food chain.
His Ribosomal RNA study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Clade, Cercozoa, Molecular biology, Plankton and Intron.
His most cited work include:
- The revised classification of eukaryotes (1087 citations)
- Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean (909 citations)
- The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote Small Sub-Unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy (627 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Enrique Lara mainly focuses on Ecology, Testate amoebae, Amoebozoa, Arcellinida and Evolutionary biology.
Enrique Lara has researched Ecology in several fields, including Protist and Phylogenetics.
His Testate amoebae research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Zoology, Botany, Euglyphida, Rhizaria and Biogeography.
His research in Amoebozoa intersects with topics in Difflugia and Molecular phylogenetics.
His biological study deals with issues like Taxon, which deal with fields such as Range and Spatial ecology.
Enrique Lara usually deals with Phylogenetic tree and limits it to topics linked to Taxonomy and DNA barcoding.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (60.71%)
- Testate amoebae (33.93%)
- Amoebozoa (20.54%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Ecology (60.71%)
- Biodiversity (15.18%)
- Testate amoebae (33.93%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Biodiversity, Testate amoebae, Habitat and Protist.
His research links Microbial ecology with Ecology.
Enrique Lara combines subjects such as Soil biodiversity and Microbiome with his study of Biodiversity.
Enrique Lara has included themes like Evolutionary biology, Amoebozoa, Arcellinida, Phylogenetic tree and Genus in his Testate amoebae study.
His Phylogenetic tree research includes elements of Difflugia, Phylogenetics and Morphometrics.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Protist, focusing on Taxonomic rank and, on occasion, Environmental DNA and Marine habitats.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Phylogenetic divergence within the Arcellinida (Amoebozoa) is congruent with test size and metabolism type. (5 citations)
- Testate Amoeba Functional Traits and Their Use in Paleoecology (4 citations)
- High-throughput sequencing of litter and moss eDNA reveals a positive correlation between the diversity of Apicomplexa and their invertebrate hosts across alpine habitats (4 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Testate amoebae, Biodiversity, Habitat and Biogeography.
Moss and Invertebrate are subfields of Ecology in which his conducts study.
His Testate amoebae research incorporates elements of Amoebozoa, Molecular phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree, Evolutionary biology and Morphometrics.
His Biodiversity research incorporates themes from Floodplain, Edaphic, Ecosystem, Spatial ecology and Dominance.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil biodiversity, Abundance, Phylotype and Litter.
His Biogeography research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Polyphyly and Paleoecology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
